It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: JustJohnny
Oddly enough the businesses you say only focus on profits are not the ones that will be defaulting on these pension plans.
The pensions about to default are city and state pensions.
I think they should ask their union reps what's going to cover the shortfall.
originally posted by: Bhadhidar
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: Bhadhidar
If you enter into a contract with another party, BOTH parties are expected to adhere to, and honor the term of the negotiated contract.
That is the most ironic part, A lot of the people paying now had nothing to do with those agreements.
Just as those currently threatened with a reduction in their promised pension amounts due to mismanagement and underfunding by city leaders over the past years, had nothing to do with the decisions made by those leaders which resulted in their pensions being underfunded now.
originally posted by: Stealu1two
a reply to: JAGStorm
I think it will be B. screw the state, unless.. there are other states that feel they need the same bailout. If that happens and the state is allowed to do this it will be a very very bad thing. As all the other states will do the same.
Many of these pensioners high tail it out of IL as soon as they retire to avoid the tax bills.
originally posted by: Bhadhidar
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: JustJohnny
Oddly enough the businesses you say only focus on profits are not the ones that will be defaulting on these pension plans.
The pensions about to default are city and state pensions.
I think they should ask their union reps what's going to cover the shortfall.
But it NOT up to the union to cover the shortfall, caused by the city and/or state underfunding the agreed terms of the pension contract the city and/or state negotiated with the union.
The onus for the shortfall rests with the city/state.
originally posted by: Bhadhidar
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: JustJohnny
Oddly enough the businesses you say only focus on profits are not the ones that will be defaulting on these pension plans.
The pensions about to default are city and state pensions.
I think they should ask their union reps what's going to cover the shortfall.
But it NOT up to the union to cover the shortfall, caused by the city and/or state underfunding the agreed terms of the pension contract the city and/or state negotiated with the union.
The onus for the shortfall rests with the city/state.
originally posted by: Bhadhidar
If you enter into a contract with another party, BOTH parties are expected to adhere to, and honor the term of the negotiated contract.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: Bhadhidar
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: JustJohnny
Oddly enough the businesses you say only focus on profits are not the ones that will be defaulting on these pension plans.
The pensions about to default are city and state pensions.
I think they should ask their union reps what's going to cover the shortfall.
But it NOT up to the union to cover the shortfall, caused by the city and/or state underfunding the agreed terms of the pension contract the city and/or state negotiated with the union.
The onus for the shortfall rests with the city/state.
What good is the union if they don't pressure the city and state to fulfill their agreements?
GM is on strike right now.
The union is pressuring a business.
Why have these other unions not done their jobs for years and years?
That and they have claimed to much of the collective pie for it not to fail eventually..
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
Yeah, I'm not claiming they are a good union but you gotta admit they make some noise when needed.
They forced the automakers out of the country to keep their benefits.
Japanese automakers, with no unions, built factories here when the big three were moving out..
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
I agree with you here. However, those guys are all gone now. We have to be fair and recognize that anyone in office today inherited this mess from someone else. In any case, assigning blame isn't going to solve the problem. Like the OP said, you can't squeeze blood from a stone. The money simply isn't there, not at the local level, and for Illinois at least not at the state level either.
originally posted by: DJMSN
What happens on the national level when Social Security finally fails ? I have heard of its failure for as long as I have been alive. I think we are finally at the tipping point when its paying out more than it takes in within the next few years. Illinois pensions have long been unsustainable and those who negotiated and recieve them have known. The politician's at the state level have probably taken funds from those pensions to cover shortfalls elsewhere. Congress has continued to "borrow" money from SS contributing to its demise. I can see a future bailout for the state from Congress who seem to be oblivious of simple math