It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump awaits SA attack plans

page: 4
11
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:43 PM
link   
a reply to: FredT

It does make you wonder.
As this has developed, there is reporting that cruise missiles were used too.
Now I'm seeing that the US wants to investigate (or be allowed to investigate).

It's doubtful the rebels have cruise missiles, so would that be the evidence "they" are looking for to push this over the edge?




posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:46 PM
link   
I guess we wasted all that time when we sold weapons to the Saudis? Why in the hell can't they fight their own battle when we just sold them a hundred billion dollars in weapons?

Does this administration really think we're that dumb?

Oh wait....



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07

Seems reasonable enough to me that we would talk with the country that got attacked before doing anything.

Better yet would be to let sa handle this by themselves.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Gandalf77

It's all calculated. When/if we do finally go to war with Iran Trump's supporters will point to the drone incident and say "See, he showed restraint before! There has to be a good reason this time!"

Those in power are playing people like fiddles.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Gandalf77

It's all calculated. When/if we do finally go to war with Iran Trump's supporters will point to the drone incident and say "See, he showed restraint before! There has to be a good reason this time!"

Those in power are playing people like fiddles.


Indeed. Business as usual in the swamp....



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: NoFearsEqualsFreeMan
a reply to: tinner07

Because SA owns the USA...

Khashoggi, 9/11... SA is such a great ally to the USA apparently...


Which is why I don't believe a damn thing that comes out of that sand heap. Whatever SA says, I assume the opposite to be the real truth.

I wouldn't put it past them to blow up their own facilities and use it as a false flag to blame an enemy, and get the US to do the dirty work. We're kinda stupid like that as it is.


I believe this before I believe iran did it.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: stormson

originally posted by: MisterSpock
I think it's unlikely trump will start another war, he's got so many other ones going on that I can't imagine we have the ability to juggle another.


hes got people, the best people, like jared to help him out.


The subway guy?



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 05:00 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

I think trump will play their game just short of actual war.

I really don't think trump wants war.

Can't even tell you why I feel that way. Because it is just a feeling.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 05:01 PM
link   
I imagine Trump will let them know when someone is going to launch an attack. The money to be made on oil is already happening. All that is left is to make those wanting some war action happy.

edit:

Gas up 36 cents since yesterday
edit on 9/17/2019 by roadgravel because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

If you make that thread i'll come star and flag it.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 05:04 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock
Bruh, there is always money for a new war as long as citizens of the Western financial hegemony continue to pay for goods and services by electronic means and buy and consume drugs.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 05:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
ahhh nothing like a good war leading into an election year when you're down in the polls eh.


Wasn't he down in the polls in 2016? Hmm, yes, I think he was.

And Trump tweeted earlier that he thinks SA should pay us (trillions) if they can't fight their own wars. Very interesting.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoFearsEqualsFreeMan
a reply to: tinner07

Because SA owns the USA...

Khashoggi, 9/11... SA is such a great ally to the USA apparently...


Don't let the Israeli's hear you talking like that. They are a jealous master.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
ahhh nothing like a good war leading into an election year when you're down in the polls eh.


Wasn't he down in the polls in 2016? Hmm, yes, I think he was.

And Trump tweeted earlier that he thinks SA should pay us (trillions) if they can't fight their own wars. Very interesting.


That was five years and a lot of cucking ago.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 05:57 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker

There's a tweet for everything. If Trump says one thing today you can bet your ass he said the opposite a few years ago.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 06:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: CriticalStinker

There's a tweet for everything. If Trump says one thing today you can bet your ass he said the opposite a few years ago.


Perhaps even a few days ago.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 06:25 PM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Don't be so Deceptive there Big Head , you know as Well as I that the Alleged " Deep State " , Neocon , Commie , Socialist NWO Globalist Cabal who are Hell Bent on Destroying Nationalism on this Planet , are just Peeing Themselves waiting for the U.S. to get Involved in yet Another Useless Unwinnable Conflict around the Globe to further Suck the Wealth from My Beloved Country . Unfortunately for these SNAKES , President Trump is just Not gonna Play that " Game " while in Office . This Alleged Attack by Iran against the Saudi's is Pure Fiction at the Moment until the Real Evidence of Guilt is Determined by the United States .
edit on 17-9-2019 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 06:25 PM
link   
Because we wasn't attacked. It SA decides a naval blockade to enforce sanctions is their response, airlifting and dropping a squadron of tanks into the ocean would be somewhat counterproductive. Although if they decided to attack Iran's oilfield production, watching them drag submarine across the desert to get into position to launch cruise missiles might be entertaining to watch.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 06:37 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

www.middleeastmonitor.com... why would he need to after muller did it allready under bush?

“He [Mueller] was the master when it came to covering up the kingdom’s role in 9/11,” survivor Sharon Premoli, who was pulled from the rubble of the World Trade Centre 18 years ago, is reported saying in the New York Post. Mueller is described as being uninterested in investigating espionage conspiracy, involving foreign intelligence officers. Instead the record is said to show he covered up evidence pointing back to the Saudi Embassy and Riyadh — and may have even misled Congress about what he knew. Such claims are likely to be met with surprise given that Mueller was appointed in 2017 to uncover a Russian plot to interfere with US elections, which is a far less serious case of espionage and conspiracy in comparison to the alleged Saudi plot against the US. Premoli went on to claim that “in October of 2001, Mueller shut down the government’s investigation after only three weeks, and then took part in the Bush [administration’s] campaign to block, obfuscate and generally stop anything about Saudi Arabia from being released.” Former FBI investigators have been cited making similar allegations. Mueller is said to have thrown up roadblocks in the path of his own investigators working the 9/11 case, while making it easier for Saudi suspects to escape questioning.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 06:59 PM
link   
I'm still surprised that Iran was

- able to fire cruise missiles across Kuwait / Iraq undetected
- able to avoid anti air, AWACS, submarine detection

and strike an oil production facility so easily!

Initially there were reports 50% ... ''FIFTY PERCENT OMG THE SKY IS FALLING'' of Saudi's output was affected. Today, its now only 5%!

What does Iran gain from this? Why would they throw such a small punch in terms of ''tanker attacks'' and ''oil field attacks''..

this really does appear to be a setup, the fact that Saudi is so quiet and appearing hesitant speaks volumes to me.
They've always been so abrupt in their hatred for Iran, so forceful in their response 'if' something happened... now suddenly, its all ''lets wait and see'' or a cautious approach!

I think the US is playing Saudi... why fight a war when you can have your friend fight it for you!




top topics



 
11
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join