It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump awaits SA attack plans

page: 3
11
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:15 PM
link   


Y'all democraps are the ones who keep everyone updated on Trump's latest tweets. It's your job to provide the tweet, not ours to go find it.
a reply to: LSU2018

yet every move by the dems is so highly covered here,,,,just thought ....never mind...




posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07

No, but I’m ok with what Trump is doing and waiting on the facts before deciding to go full blown war hungry like all the previous Presidents. I know that’s hard for some people to grasp which is where the simple people remark came from.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:17 PM
link   


Parliamentary Motion !! I demand the Tweet NOW !!!!! Mr Chairman ? Mr Chairman ? 🐔 Are you Chickening out ? 🐔
a reply to: xuenchen


I am sure you could find it....not an anti trump thread...



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:18 PM
link   


Gabbard keeping it real.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:19 PM
link   


before deciding to go full blown war hungry like all the previous Presidents.
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

which previous presidents went full blown war?



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:20 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Thank you...for posting the tweet



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07



I don't know, Joe's one mean mamma jamma. I just heard the story about how he handled corn pop and his gang down at the old swimmin pool.
a reply to: MisterSpock
you have nothing to say about the tweet then say nothing at all please.

Unless you can produce it, say nothing at all please.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:20 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Tulsi being fake as always. Just another butt-hurt socialist that lost in the primaries.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

Still doesn't change the fact that the current administration is covering up Saudi Arabia's involvement in 9/11.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
ahhh nothing like a good war leading into an election year when you're down in the polls eh.

Yes , the Democrats are most definitely down on the polls .
So , you believe that is the reason the Dems are pushing so hard for a war with Iran or China ?
Remember Senator and the alledged Russian interference ?
Asked Flynn 3 times if he thought that was an act of war.
Then stated she definitely considered it so .

So , you are absolutely US citizen certified correct .
This time .



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:31 PM
link   


Unless you can produce it, say nothing at all please.
a reply to: schuyler

It has been produced...unless you actually want me to produce it?



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:34 PM
link   
hate to thread and run... not trying to be one of those guys... gonna go grab some ingredients and cook dinner for my wife.

back to discuss later



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:39 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

why? because YOU wont make it right??


see how easy that is, YOU can be the shinning example and make a thread, YOU.


If you don't, you will be forever known as the enlightend chicken hence forth.


see hwo easy that was?


so a tweet that was never posted is wrong

the left wonders why all the derision.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:47 PM
link   
Yeah that's cool and all, but what about the Area 51 attack plans?



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 03:59 PM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati

Why would I want to make a thread on it? It would just be ignored and/or I'd get the same handful of posters throwing ad homs and insults at me.

No thanks, I've learned my lesson. I won't pop the bubble any more than I deem necessary. I find the hypocrisy and echo chamber interesting.

edit on 9/17/2019 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:03 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07

The only way to circumvent congress would be to use the 9/11 war law.

Ironically Saudi Arabia fits the criteria more than Iran.

This would be the ultimate cuck for the US towards SA. If protecting them by redacting 9/11 commission pages was bad, doing their foreign policy bidding (again) would just be icing on the cake.

To be fair though, this Nixon style of unpredictability has gotten me wound up before, so I will wait and see.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:20 PM
link   
Credit where credit is due: Trump did show a remarkable level of restraint w/Iran after they shot our drone down.
Hopefully he can do so again this time. It would be a shame to see SA wag the dog yet again...



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:23 PM
link   
I think Saudi used the Bro Code.

And everyone knows, you never break the bro code.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:34 PM
link   
SO lets see if I follow:

1) War monger Bolton get canned and despite a real possibility of some sort of solution, the Iranians say screw it and launch a drone attack from their own territory

2) The do so directly over the gulf using non stealthy drones for a limited attack against a country they are on the verge of a religious war with and has been perhaps calling for the US to hit harder than even netanyahoo

3) The House of Saud is armed to the teeth and have advanced SAM systems and radar coverage yet this attack gets through undetected and launched from their greatest foe?

4) They came from the direction of Iran. You cannot make Iran out to be some sort of terrorist mastermind and then also expect them to make cartoonish errors like a direct flight

5) They cannot come from the rebels. Hmmm seems like the Saudi's have been getting their asses handed to them by these rebels for a while now. But yeah it cannot be them.


This has false flag or rebel action written all over it.

How many of the 911 hijackers were Saudi????????



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 04:43 PM
link   
I read that a group affiliated with Iran attacked that Saudi oil field. That group has been against the Saudi's for years. I am not sure if Iran actually was directly involved in that attack, if it had been, I think we would have bombed Iran already.

With these terrorist groups, or moderate revolutionaries as they call them, a lot of countries are funding these groups to do their bidding. The USA has been doing that all along, we used to actually be much more pushy with sending support to groups trying to overthrow governments we did not like before than now.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join