It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former FBI Asst Director Andy McCabe Prepares For Trial - Obama Admin Colleagues Desert Him.

page: 4
38
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

The user is getting bold, desperation is the result in attitude changes when one doesn't get their desired outcome.

Careful, it's venomous, just sit back and read through the replies, damn near unhinged.




posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

Just knock it off will you. You dont know me so stop pretending you know how I think..
I dont follow Beto.
Just because someone is a democrat does not mean that I blindly follow them.

Unlike this crowd who thinks an R is a pedigree.


Awwwww diddums... Mud Pit suddenly got too truthful did it...?

Truth hurts huh!

Have some crayons and a colouring book Silly and get used to the TRUTH...

Lags



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:04 AM
link   

Ex-FBI official, Andrew McCabe, faces prospect of criminal charges

www.pbs.org...

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, a frequent target of President Donald Trump's wrath, faces the prospect of criminal charges after his lawyers failed to persuade senior Justice Department officials that he didn't intentionally lie to internal investigators.


Even pbs is reporting this.
McCabe is burnt toast.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


I suppose there could be a sealed indictment but really why? LOL.


That has already been explained to you, but you refuse to listen.

So far, all of these articles are still talking about McCabe lying and leaking to the press and I'm sure that's what the grand jury was meeting over.

On the other hand, the Inspector General's report on FISA abuse, has only been in the hands of the Attorney General for a short time, so there could be a previously sealed indictment being held until all the other indictments come out on the FISA abuse.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Not what he was in trouble for dude.

Sorry.

He was never charged or even accused of leaking illegitimately. Since he had the authority to do so in the first place as second in command at the bureau.
He was accused of not telling them who he told. Which is why its less than candid and not lying like you seem to think.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

He wasnt "questioned" by the FBI in that manner.
It was in context with work.

You think they are under oath 24/7 and every conversation is an interrogation?

Give me a break.


If he was accused of lying to the FBI in the course of being questioned as a witness or target or subject that would be something different.
And I believe what he was fired for was being less than candid which seems they cant actually say oh hey he lied to us since no one is using that language but you guys.

No he was questioned as part of the ig investigation.
Somehow in all this you missed that.
Not really surprised tho.
A lot of things get "foggy" these days, right?


(post by Lagomorphe removed for a manners violation)

posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Deetermined

Except every other agency that looked at the FISA application say it was ligitimate and legally obtained so
there's the bottom out of that theory.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:10 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

wrong



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Lagomorphe

You think you're cute dont you?



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme
Pbs?
Salon?

Doubt it.

What is humorous is that word on the street is McCabe has flipped on his co-conspirators.
Lots more dem trash for the ash heap.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Deetermined

Except every other agency that looked at the FISA application say it was ligitimate and legally obtained so
there's the bottom out of that theory.


That depends on which agency you're talking about, but other reports have come out stating that the DOJ's office is finding out differently. So, that puts an end to your theory.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Lagomorphe

You think you're cute dont you?


Yup😉



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

wrong


How, where, when...?

Come on BIG lady... you know you can do it... 😉

Prove it Silly.

Lags
edit on 17-9-2019 by Lagomorphe because: Toilet talk as usual...



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:16 AM
link   
And Grambler is off trying to find the posts he claims I made.

He's gonna be a while.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Lagomorphe

You think you're cute dont you?

I think you're cute.

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust


Mueller's team leaked regularly and often to CNN, MSNBC, NYTimes, and the Washington Post.


Ha ha ha.
Riiiiiiiight.


If you need a reference, look at Jerome Corsi's lawsuit against Mueller. There's 77 pages of misconduct and proven media leaks that show that someone from his team leaked grand jury information.



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
And Grambler is off trying to find the posts he claims I made.

He's gonna be a while.


Hahaha!

No I am fighting with my computer

Once it’s ready I’ll post showing that in fact the ig found McCabe was investigates for leaks against fbi policy

So you are wrong again



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Deetermined

Why didn't you link their reporting then?

Legitimate news outlets are reporting exactly what I have said.

There is no indication that the grand jury has decided to indict McCabe.

The only ones pushing this slant are right wing rags.

But if you can find a legitimate news agency saying that McCabe is indeed going to be indicted I'd like to see it.


Likewise, show us one of your sources that claims that McCabe definitely WAS NOT indicted. Hint, there isn't one.

In the meanwhile, other sources are reporting that there are people lining up to defend McCabe in court (should he have to go), just like the original post pointed out.

Obama’s team lines up to defend Andrew McCabe in court

www.politico.com...

Former Obama officials willing to testify on McCabe's behalf: report

thehill.com...




edit on 17-9-2019 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2019 @ 07:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

I never #ing said any such thing. You are a liar.


Here is just one example of you saying Mueller would prove crimes on collusion (which as he admitted in the report he didn't)


Trump uses the word impeachment in every conversation he has. He's terrified. He knows he's committed crimes.
Mueller is relentless.
If there was no collusion he would have wrapped this up already. I think he has a water tight case



Of course you still claim the dossier is true as you have all along.

But if you are now claiming you didn't say that, I can get those quotes for you as well.



new topics

top topics



 
38
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join