It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Brett Kavanaugh Fit In With the Privileged Kids. She Did Not.

page: 2
20
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 15 2019 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: MykeNukem

Just in general ....


A study conducted by researchers from Caltech, the Wharton School [#45's alma mater], Western University, and ZRT Laboratory

tested the hypothesis that higher levels of testosterone increase the tendency in men to rely on their intuitive judgments

and reduce cognitive reflection—a decision-making process by which a person stops to consider whether their gut reaction to something makes sense.

The researchers found that men given doses of testosterone performed more poorly on a test designed to measure cognitive reflection than a group given a placebo.


www.caltech.edu...

So the 'more masculine' a man, the more irrational.


edit on 15-9-2019 by FyreByrd because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 15 2019 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: seagull
So the hysterics that supposedly passed for committee hearings didn't do the job... So now they're going to try it again?




Apparently the FBI didn't do it's job properly....

www.rawstory.com...



posted on Sep, 15 2019 @ 07:12 PM
link   
A Clinton lawyer makes an accusation ...

so we all have to believe #HisStory now?

I mean Max Stier worked with both Clintons to defend them from allegations, and the woman in question claims she has no recollection of the event Stier is recounting.


Interestingly, the alleged victim is not quoted in the article, and neither are any corroborating witnesses. In fact, The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway reported that "the book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event."



posted on Sep, 15 2019 @ 07:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: FyreByrd
a reply to: MykeNukem

Just in general ....


A study conducted by researchers from Caltech, the Wharton School [#45's alma mater], Western University, and ZRT Laboratory

tested the hypothesis that higher levels of testosterone increase the tendency in men to rely on their intuitive judgments

and reduce cognitive reflection—a decision-making process by which a person stops to consider whether their gut reaction to something makes sense.

The researchers found that men given doses of testosterone performed more poorly on a test designed to measure cognitive reflection than a group given a placebo.


www.caltech.edu...

So the 'more masculine' a man, the more irrational.



I'm completely at a loss as to what your comment is about.

Can you explain?



posted on Sep, 15 2019 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme
Weren't you the one that said he wouldn't get the confirmation?
Why should anyone listen to you when all you are is wrong?



posted on Sep, 15 2019 @ 08:46 PM
link   
a reply to: MykeNukem

www.nationalreview.com...

The book isn’t released until Tuesday, but Mollie Hemingway got a copy, and she writes on Twitter: “The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event.” Omitting this fact from the New York Times story is one of the worst cases of journalistic malpractice in recent memory. If you take this confusing accusation in the essay at face value, it doesn’t even appear to be an allegation of assault against Kavanaugh. If Kavanaugh’s “friends pushed his penis,” then isn’t it an allegation of wrongdoing against Kavanaugh’s “friends,” not Kavanaugh himself? Surely even a modern liberal Yalie who’s been to one of those weird non-sexual “naked parties” would recognize both the female student and Kavanaugh are both alleged victims in this alleged incident, barring an additional allegation that a college-aged Kavanaugh asked his “friends” to “push his penis.”
and by the rules of liberalism if he was drunk and others forced his genitals around like the skeptical claims of the book say wouldnt that mean HE was sexually assulted as he didnt consent to being touched?

www.gettyimages.ca... some info on the alleged witness whos wife was nominated for a judgeship under obama (it expired)but sure they like to label him non partisan even though he was on bill clintons defense team during his impeachment shenanigans

dems reek of desperation as only one justice was ever "impeached" and the senate acquitted ,they dont have the votes to impeach trump let alone a sitting SCOTUS its like all of them seem to forget they dont have any where near the votes in the senate for either attempt



posted on Sep, 15 2019 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

www.newsweek.com... yup but now shes trying to walk back her comments and the media is trying to memory hole it



posted on Sep, 15 2019 @ 09:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DAVID64

Wow explain how this relates to the election?


The dEms aren’t even running. They’re not on the ticket. Have you been watching things at all?

Trump has the ‘election’ won already, by a VERY LARGE margin.

Everything the dimwits do only makes that margin bigger



posted on Sep, 15 2019 @ 09:11 PM
link   
a reply to: RalagaNarHallas

Yea, I was just reading an article stating that she has no memory of the "assault".

Sounds like a great witness. LMAO

Now they just say "Some people did something", then they call SWAT in...or impeach you.

Makes ya wonder...


edit on 9/15/2019 by MykeNukem because: sp,



posted on Sep, 16 2019 @ 02:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Yeah sure they will.
Don't be so dramatic.
You're English for crying out loud.


...and just as predicted, the impeachment calls have started.
So yeah, 'sure they will'.



posted on Sep, 16 2019 @ 06:01 AM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Every single time??

Really?? How many times was Kavanaugh investigated over the years since becoming a federal judge? Nothing has ever been found??

...and they're trying to tell us that the FBI screwed it up every time?? ...and what, pray, is going to make it any different this time?? Or the next?? Or the next judges selected for the bench??

Maybe Congress, or more specifically the House, needs to investigate the BI? Maybe??



posted on Sep, 16 2019 @ 08:30 AM
link   
www.foxnews.com...


NYT updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault




The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh — hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic presidential candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh. The update included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault in question at all. The Times also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no comment about the episode.

oops
more garbage from the nyt

not surprising



posted on Sep, 16 2019 @ 08:35 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Kavenaugh should like a libel suit against the New York Times. This was a deliberate hit piece. The "victim" doesn't even recall any attack happening? So who is making the claim? Probably the Clinton-associated lawyer.



posted on Sep, 16 2019 @ 08:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
www.foxnews.com...


NYT updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault




The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh — hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic presidential candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh. The update included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault in question at all. The Times also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no comment about the episode.

oops
more garbage from the nyt

not surprising


This is my surprised face


No really


But, but, they aren't biased and never release BS news...



posted on Sep, 16 2019 @ 08:38 AM
link   
This is still a headline on cnn.
Even with the nyt retraction.

simply garbage



posted on Sep, 16 2019 @ 08:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: shooterbrody

Kavenaugh should like a libel suit against the New York Times. This was a deliberate hit piece. The "victim" doesn't even recall any attack happening? So who is making the claim? Probably the Clinton-associated lawyer.

nothing but garbage from these people lately
they cant stand behind issues because the issue they chose is to take peoples guns
nobody wants that

all they have left are dirty tricks
they are not good at them

at this point they are not even as accomplished as the three stooges



posted on Sep, 16 2019 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: shooterbrody

Kavenaugh should like a libel suit against the New York Times. This was a deliberate hit piece. The "victim" doesn't even recall any attack happening? So who is making the claim? Probably the Clinton-associated lawyer.

nothing but garbage from these people lately
they cant stand behind issues because the issue they chose is to take peoples guns
nobody wants that

all they have left are dirty tricks
they are not good at them

at this point they are not even as accomplished as the three stooges

In addition to choosing the wrong issues, they also don't have any accomplishments they can point to, having wasted the last 3 years trying to find some excuse to impeach Trump.

Seriously: Can you name anything the Dems have even tried to improve since 2016?



posted on Sep, 16 2019 @ 09:37 AM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan



Seriously: Can you name anything the Dems have even tried to improve since 2016?

their bank accounts and re election funding



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 1   >>

log in

join