It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Strong support for Trump linked to willingness to persecute immigrants and commit violence.

page: 2
15
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:
+5 more 
posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 09:42 PM
link   
Aren’t you embarrassed for yourself posting this garbage?

Have some self-respect and get a real job.

Poor slob.



+2 more 
posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 09:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: randomthoughts12
a reply to: clubheadjobby

With all their different reasons people support Trump and America this is what you are linking it to? Pretty sad if this is your thought. This kind of post you created is a bigger link to people supporting Trump.



What's actually really funny is the DNC puts people like this on their payroll to post stuff like this on social media... which in turn not only solidifies Trump's base because they are sick and tired of being insulted, but it also makes moderates think that Dem supporters are batsnip crazy and it repels them so they end up voting against the Democratic party.

At the end of the day, the DNC is literally paying people to work hard at getting Trump re-elected.

Someone somewhere in the DNC should probably re-evaluate this business model.




posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Metallicus
Aren’t you embarrassed for yourself posting this garbage?

Have some self-respect and get a real job.

Poor slob.


That's the key, making them think they are "on the right side of history" even though none of them would stand by them as they fall to history.

Self-Respect??? LOL, that requires some ounce of intelligence.

It's really getting old, here, out there and everywhere.



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 09:47 PM
link   
These types of drones(the freely brainwashed or paid by the cent posters) are the last of the pawns in the battlefield.

You have the major 6 figure players on the MSM propaganda channels falling into the abyss, all that's left is the weary foot soldier. Dim but wholly brainwashed as he keeps droning on the marching orders of his superiors.

It's all crumbling to pieces, not just the narrative, but their fragile reality that was feed to them.

It's going to be a rough 5 years ahead, but I take solace in knowing that if anything, darwin will be well fed.



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 09:56 PM
link   
Thread trashed in 3... 2...



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 09:56 PM
link   
a reply to: clubheadjobby




Aside from a general willingness to ignore facts

you also demonstrate perfectly the cowardice of your party with every
bump and run post.


+5 more 
posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: clubheadjobby


Haha, just joking, I'm sure the insults and ad-homs will be fast and furious


Just to clarify...

If I call you a political hack and you ARE a political hack it is not a ad hominem attack.

It is merely an observation.




edit on 8-9-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:07 PM
link   
The new battle cry of the Democrat Partii !!!




posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:15 PM
link   
So, further investigated has revealed that this opinion piece is actually sourcing an ABC article, a notorious liberal media organization.

In fact, from the main source:


In many cases of assault or threat, charges are never filed, perpetrators are never identified or the incident is never even reported to authorities. And most criminal acts committed by Trump supporters or his detractors have nothing to do with the president. But in 36 cases, court records and police reports indicated some sort of link.


Oh? None of these cases have anything to do with the POTUS?

So, what are these 36 case and the "Some sort of Link"? Stemming from?

ABC was gracious enough to supply them, here is an example of that "link" lol:


Aug. 19, 2015: In Boston, after he and his brother beat a sleeping homeless man of Mexican descent with a metal pole, Steven Leader, 30, told police "Donald Trump was right, all these illegals need to be deported." The victim, however, was not in the United States illegally. The brothers, who are white, ultimately pleaded guilty to several assault-related charges and were each sentenced to at least two years in prison.

So, they mention "Trump"...and that's all. That's the ultimate nefarious link.

Actually, the source isn't all ANTI TRUMP EITHER, LMFAO, this next one is a doozy, but it mentions Trump, so put it in the pile, amiright???


Feb. 15, 2019: Police in Falmouth, Massachusetts, arrested 41-year-old Rosiane Santos after she "verbally assault[ed]" a man for wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat in a Mexican restaurant and then "violently push[ed] his head down," according to police reports. Apparently intoxicated, "she stated that [the victim] was a 'motherf----r' for supporting Trump," one of the responding officers wrote. "She also stated that he shouldn't be allowed in a Mexican restaurant with that." Santos was in the United States unlawfully, federal authorities said. Police arrested her on charges of "simple assault" and disorderly conduct. She has since admitted in local court that there are "sufficient facts" to warrant charges, and she has been placed on a form of probation


Pitiful, it's like you're not even trying.

How utterly ridiculous that the OP couldn't even source the main source, rather, rely on the opinions of some reporter without a real bone in this fight, as a matter of fact, this is her only Trump article out of many other "Nature" articles.
Her name is Chelsea Whyte and I have more twitter followers than her, lmfao.

Ultimately, while I'm on the fence with Wray stonewalling Barr, he did have something positive to add, a general broad statement that pertains to all politicians but somehow ABC warped it into Trump only, nevermind Maxine Waters and the "The Squad".
Actually, AOC influenced an ANTIFA member, who of which attacked a federal facility. A
ccordingly, by ABCs logic, what Trump is guilty of, "the squad" is guilty of as well 😏


"Any public figure could have the effect of inspiring people," FBI Director Chris Wray told a Senate panel in July. "But remember that the people who commit hate fueled violence are not logical, rational people."


***Not logical rational people.


edit on 8-9-2019 by Arnie123 because: Ouch

edit on 8-9-2019 by Arnie123 because: Cleaned up for that L



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock
The reason the left has a hard time getting any traction with this is the usual attempt to conflate "immigration" and "ILLEGAL immigration".

By dropping the "illegal" part and painting anyone as some sort of evil racist, it just pisses off people that can quantify the distinction and make those that chose to conflate the two as the slobbering morons they are.


Yet, are asylum seekers illegal immigrants? Nope.

Trump's language has described them as such.

He even called them "illegals" when they were thousands of miles away, walking towards the US border.

The label "illegal" has clearly been applied to many who have not broken any US law (and aren't likely to).

Once, long ago, false testimony was a crime.

edit on 8/9/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)


+4 more 
posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:20 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Excellent, how could we hope to get through a thread on US immigration without the resident legal expert from some random island thousands of miles away....

I see you hand washed all your hobits early tonight and the wife let you get online to impart your worthless NZ perspective unto our country......

Don't you have some guns to "voluntarily" turn into your "non authoritarian" government?


+5 more 
posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: MisterSpock
The reason the left has a hard time getting any traction with this is the usual attempt to conflate "immigration" and "ILLEGAL immigration".

By dropping the "illegal" part and painting anyone as some sort of evil racist, it just pisses off people that can quantify the distinction and make those that chose to conflate the two as the slobbering morons they are.


Yet, are asylum seekers illegal immigrants? Nope.

Trump's language has described them as such.

He even called them "illegals" when they were thousands of miles away, walking towards the US border.

The label "illegal" has clearly been applied to many who have not broken any US law (and aren't likely to).

Once, long ago, false testimony was a crime.
False.

If you seek asylum, go to a "Port of Entry". If you don't and cross illegally, you're an ILLEGAL.

Also, you're not in any position to determine whether or not the vast majority of those are asylum seekers, many are economic migrants.

Illegal applies to those who enter our Country illegally, this isn't rocket science.

Once again, foreign ignorance.



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:24 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut




Yet, are asylum seekers illegal immigrants? Nope.

They are , until they apply.



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: MisterSpock
The reason the left has a hard time getting any traction with this is the usual attempt to conflate "immigration" and "ILLEGAL immigration".

By dropping the "illegal" part and painting anyone as some sort of evil racist, it just pisses off people that can quantify the distinction and make those that chose to conflate the two as the slobbering morons they are.


Yet, are asylum seekers illegal immigrants? Nope.

Trump's language has described them as such.

He even called them "illegals" when they were thousands of miles away, walking towards the US border.

The label "illegal" has clearly been applied to many who have not broken any US law (and aren't likely to).

Once, long ago, false testimony was a crime.
False.

If you seek asylum, go to a "Port of Entry". If you don't and cross illegally, you're an ILLEGAL.

Also, you're not in any position to determine whether or not the vast majority of those are asylum seekers, many are economic migrants.

Illegal applies to those who enter our Country illegally, this isn't rocket science.

Once again, foreign ignorance.


Hold on a minute there. He watches CNN and is highly politically active in a country he has zero stake in.

You, and I, should trust his "expertise" regarding US law that pertains to LEGAL asylum seeking.

If we don't assume the above, it would seem like he's just some brainwashed foreign pawn in the anti US narrative.



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:26 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Asylum "seekers" become illegal as soon as their court dates pass and they are nowhere to be found 🤣 🤓 🤡



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: MisterSpock
The reason the left has a hard time getting any traction with this is the usual attempt to conflate "immigration" and "ILLEGAL immigration".

By dropping the "illegal" part and painting anyone as some sort of evil racist, it just pisses off people that can quantify the distinction and make those that chose to conflate the two as the slobbering morons they are.


Yet, are asylum seekers illegal immigrants? Nope.

Trump's language has described them as such.

He even called them "illegals" when they were thousands of miles away, walking towards the US border.

The label "illegal" has clearly been applied to many who have not broken any US law (and aren't likely to).

Once, long ago, false testimony was a crime.
False.

If you seek asylum, go to a "Port of Entry". If you don't and cross illegally, you're an ILLEGAL.

Also, you're not in any position to determine whether or not the vast majority of those are asylum seekers, many are economic migrants.

Illegal applies to those who enter our Country illegally, this isn't rocket science.

Once again, foreign ignorance.


Hold on a minute there. He watches CNN and is highly politically active in a country he has zero stake in.

You, and I, should trust his "expertise" regarding US law that pertains to LEGAL asylum seeking.

If we don't assume the above, it would seem like he's just some brainwashed foreign pawn in the anti US narrative.
😱😱😱 you don't say?!??



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
A great study full of facts from Democrat ringleaders and carnival barkers nationwide 🤣

Democrats prefer ..... 🤓 🤡



Who in their right mind would believe that the Democrats support any of this?

Instead of reading what the Republican Party alleges the Democratic Party stands for, why don't you read their actual platform (last revised in 2016):

Democratic Party Platform



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:40 PM
link   
a reply to: clubheadjobby

This is why people claim that ATS has become a right wing site.

Someone will post nonsense, never rebut or debate.

When many people come on to refute the garbage, the leftists will lazily point out that ATS has become right wing and never point to the topic again.

It’s becomming quite evident.

Prove me wrong OP and defend your stance.



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:42 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Alls ya gotta do is listen to the Democrat debates and you'll hear just what that meme shows 🤡 🤓



posted on Sep, 8 2019 @ 10:43 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Cowards don't know how to defend themselves, soy diet would be my guess.



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join