It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TGunner
A new rule was issued on Wednesday reversing a requirement, enacted during Barack Obama’s presidency, for all new light bulbs to be energy-efficient by 2020.
The Energy Department said that the rule change “will ensure that the choice of how to light homes and businesses is left to the American people, not the federal government”
The move, welcomed by industry has been strongly criticized by climate change groups. The move is also in line with Donald Trumps 2012 warnings about the dangers of so called “environmentally friendly” light bulbs.
Trump Scraps Obama-Era Rules For Energy Efficient Bulbs
I'm really kinda happy about this, I never liked the new bulbs. I bought 10 boxes of Incandescent lights a few years ago so i wouldn't run out of them so, good decision on his part.
Remember, new "environment friendly" light bulbs can cause cancer. Be careful-- the idiots who came up with this stuff don't care. Donald J. Trump 2012
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: smurfy
They are not perfect as yet, they do have other content that is not so good, lead, arsenic is there, and all the lessons are not yet learned, or not been implemented...
How do you get to the arsenic and lead on an LED light bulb?
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: TheRedneck
a reply to: smurfy
That was my point, even if LEDs have arsenic and lead, they are not in reach of a common user, we need to take the light bulbs apart to get to the LEDs and then to open the LEDs themselves to get to the arsenic.
Saying that LED light bulbs have arsenic and lead, although true, is misleading. We can also say that chickens have arsenic (they do), but does makes them a health problem?
originally posted by: smurfy
There is no intent to mislead,
as the EU report of 2018 says itself, The Committee concluded that there is no evidence of direct adverse health effects from LEDs emission in normal use
ec.europa.eu...
Even so,
There can be harmful damage from certain LED's in their operation though, I had some peripheral damage to the rods in my right eye, from an intense Blue headlight on a car sitting at a junction as I drove by one early evening, when I glanced in that direction.
That's why I say people need to be properly informed of any dangers...some yahoos fit these lamps to their vehicles themselves, and that's probably what happened to me.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: smurfy
There is no intent to mislead,
as the EU report of 2018 says itself, The Committee concluded that there is no evidence of direct adverse health effects from LEDs emission in normal use
ec.europa.eu...
Then why did you say that LEDs have arsenic? That what I was referring to, that saying that LEDs have arsenic is misleading, as the arsenic in them is not harmful to us.
Even so,
There can be harmful damage from certain LED's in their operation though, I had some peripheral damage to the rods in my right eye, from an intense Blue headlight on a car sitting at a junction as I drove by one early evening, when I glanced in that direction.
That's why I say people need to be properly informed of any dangers...some yahoos fit these lamps to their vehicles themselves, and that's probably what happened to me.
Bad use of a tool is not the tool's fault. I doubt that guy was worried about possible hill effects on people from the lights on his car.
originally posted by: smurfy
I said it was sealed in plastic, that obviously means it is safe as long as it is sealed.
They are not perfect as yet, they do have other content that is not so good, lead, arsenic is there, and all the lessons are not yet learned, or not been implemented...it's just that manufacturers tend to utilise in their products...pretty much like how the rest of us get on board with new stuff.
In other words, there is no law against it
When the time comes as LED's are no longer working, then they need to be disposed of, I have no idea as to what the ultilities will do with them.
Now, for instance, cars with red LED's have much higher concentrations of the metals in them, and in an accident, the report actually recommends emergency services wear protective clothing when dealing with car accident wreckage.
I'll bet you that none of those recommendations are being carried out as yet, while even the report admits that there is much more to be learnt by themselves,
Arsenic and lead are old bedfellows, themselves used in making plastic items for years a plastic self colourant I think...Tuppawear comes to mind, and the stuff contains other metals that can leach out, hence that health scare...by governments, and with good reason.
originally posted by: ArMaP
You didn't say that on the post I was commenting,.....
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: smurfy
As I already stated, LEDs are now lead-free, as are most other electronic components. The lead was used to tin the contacts, just like solder was once, not long ago actually, a tin-lead mixture.
As for the arsenic leaching out, you apparently do not understand what ion implantation is. The arsenic used for doping is not sitting there in a pile waiting to leach out... it is individual atoms that are scattered more or less uniformly throughout the area of the substrate. It cannot leach out... that's not even possible for more than maybe 10s of atoms. Each atom is tightly bound covalently to the next atom in the crystalline structure. It has to be that way or the PN junction will not function.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: TGunner
I'm all for LED bulbs. I'm also for the government not telling someone what they can and cant use for lighting in their home. I got lucky as far as price. Where I work they brought in a company where one could buy LED bulb for not a lot of money. They had all sorts of different bulbs. I went nuts and stocked up. I haven't had one burn out yet.