Trump Violates 18 U.S. Code § 2074

a reply to: strongfp

You gotta love this, eh strongfp?
My sick sense of humor is just to easily amused.

Weather agency now backs Trump, says Dorian could have impacted Alabama

The federal agency that monitors hurricanes said Friday that Hurricane Dorian could have impacted Alabama, backing claims by President Trump that he was right to tweet a warning over the weekend about the storm affecting the state.

In an unsigned statement, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said that "information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama." The advisories in question were dated from Wednesday, Aug. 28 to Monday, Sept. 2, the agency said.

www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: Identified

" Whoever knowingly issues or publishes any counterfeit weather forecast or warning of weather conditions falsely representing such forecast or warning to have been issued or published by the Weather Bureau, United States Signal Service, or other branch of the Government service, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ninety days, or both. "


Really ? Then How Come Every Weather Man on the Weather Channel and CNN are Not in Jail Yet ?

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
Whoever knowingly...

There's your alibi! Trump has to know something first. He's safe guys, we can all go home now.

hmm.. when was the fbi affirmed with congress?

let me know that then lets get on with the Christmas eve and the IRS?

The news is constantly twisting the path of hurricanes and making people all over scared. They enjoy keeping people tuned in to their news reports.

We do not know who altered that map, it could be anyone. It may have been a planted map that the Democrats hired someone to give him so he would make a fool of himself. This is a conspiracy site, we need to keep our minds open for possibilities.

The government, and also Mountain Dew, get the UP messed up on maps. We actually had the Mountain Dew people make special UP cans for the UP people when they put us as part of Wisconsin on their maps. When the government screws up and puts the UP as part of Canada or forget to put us on the US map, we do not get anything. The government should be forced to put on a big BBQ in the UP when that happens, but no...not even a real admission they screwed up.

If Obama did something like this, the right wingers would loose their mind, even more so than they did when he mis-pronounced corpsman.

Once again this shows that Trump's faithful will justify anything he does.

a reply to: rickymouse

It most certainly was Trump who altered the map.

www.cnn.com...

Washington(CNN)President Donald Trump was the one who used a black Sharpie marker to alter an official National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration map to include Alabama in Hurricane Dorian's trajectory during an Oval Office presentation earlier this week, The Washington Post reported.

a reply to: mtnshredder

Yes, had he made that tweet 2 days earlier. When he posted that, it was apparent that Dorian was no longer a threat to the Gulf Coast, west Florida, AND Alabama.

He made a mistake and is not man enough to admit it.

originally posted by: sine.nomine
a reply to: sligtlyskeptical


How many random accusations can we fit in one thread? Spin the wheel, and let's find out!

YES! #RESISTers, please keep it going - this thread is an absolute TDS goldmine

Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!

Trump has pinned a new tweet to his timeline
twitter.com...

Hilarious!

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: rickymouse

It most certainly was Trump who altered the map.

www.cnn.com...

Washington(CNN)President Donald Trump was the one who used a black Sharpie marker to alter an official National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration map to include Alabama in Hurricane Dorian's trajectory during an Oval Office presentation earlier this week, The Washington Post reported.

Yeah, according to the people working at the Washington Post, none of who were even in the White House in Trumps vicinity at the time.

And the article linked states....."No one else writes like that on a map with a black Sharpie," a White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity told the Post.

So, since that white house official...probably a cleaning person who is officially called a janitor....says since nobody they know would start drawing on something like that, it must be Trump.
I do not think the Washington post is a reliable source to quote. Sorry, but I am not that much of an idiot, anyone working in the White house is actually an official, even the guy who mows the grass has an official title.

originally posted by: babybunnies
In an update, the official statement has now been amended to say that Dorian COULD have impacted Alabama

NOAA reports to Department of Commerce, run by Trump long time stooge Wilbur Ross

Someone was paid off / leant on to make this statement

Have you seen who is Communications Director at the NOAA?

Julie Kay Roberts

And a bit of her background.

a reply to: RexKramerPRT

So?
Are you suggesting that scientific orgainsiations don't tell the truth and instead lie according to their bias???
Interesting.
I wonder where that leaves the Climate Change debate ... I guess we'll need to check the bias there too, right?

More importantly, are you suggesting that the ACTUAL reports from the time from the NOAA didn't really happen and we've lived through an alternate reality?

Seems you chaps will go as far as you need and into the realms of 'completely crazy' in order to hide your utter embarrassment at being humiliated again.

a reply to: UKTruth

I'd be inclined to believe the pro's and not the PR head. He used old data and everyone took the piss and he wouldn't let it drop then an ally put out a statement to try and dig him out of the #.

originally posted by: RazorV66
They gotta keep their impeachment hopes alive somehow.
It’s called throwing sh!t at the wall and hoping something sticks.

By now the wall is buried in #.

originally posted by: RexKramerPRT
a reply to: UKTruth

I'd be inclined to believe the pro's and not the PR head. He used old data and everyone took the piss and he wouldn't let it drop then an ally put out a statement to try and dig him out of the #.

The NOAA gave him the reports over a few days up to the 2nd September. Fact.
The actual notices given by the NOAA through those dates have been provided.
Bad luck. You're wrong.
You jumped on a CNN hit piece and have egg on your face.
It could be worse, you could be in CNN's position... they are complete clowns.

a reply to: UKTruth

Some earlier predictions had some tracks reaching the Gulf Coast. By the time Trump said Alabama was at risk it no longer was. He used old data, or rather Alabama popped into his head from the earlier forecasts, and when you are getting constant updates using the most recent data is preferable. Who cares what was thought a few days ago when it's now irrelevant?

originally posted by: RexKramerPRT
a reply to: UKTruth

Some earlier predictions had some tracks reaching the Gulf Coast. By the time Trump said Alabama was at risk it no longer was. He used old data, or rather Alabama popped into his head from the earlier forecasts, and when you are getting constant updates using the most recent data is preferable. Who cares what was thought a few days ago when it's now irrelevant?

At most Alabama was mentioned 1 day after the last NOAA report that mentioned it.
So, no, you're still wrong.
Bottom line - the scientific community forecast that Alabama could be hit. Trump used their data.
IN a comical attempt at a gotcha, the fake news media went into overdrive and ended up with egg on their faces. Those that jump when the likes of CNN jump only have themselves to blame.
Bad luck. Hopefully you will learn for next time.

a reply to: UKTruth

He used old, irrelevant, data and got shown up for it. Instead of dropping it, and everyone forgetting, he wouldn't let it lie and kept digging. Then someone who used to work for him, who is now Comms Director at the NOAA, released a statement for him to point to saying he was right. He cannot stand being wrong.

originally posted by: RexKramerPRT
a reply to: UKTruth

He used old, irrelevant, data and got shown up for it. Instead of dropping it, and everyone forgetting, he wouldn't let it lie and kept digging. Then someone who used to work for him, who is now Comms Director at the NOAA, released a statement for him to point to saying he was right. He cannot stand being wrong.

Neither can you, it seems.