It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Assault weapons are the devil!

page: 5
10
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

Yes, have mandatory mental health reports, references from family and friends, a good reason to own a gun, gun training, and 10 round maximum.


So you are no better than the person standing in from of a voting booth demanding a justification from someone before they can vote.





You mean like Trump was doing regarding the popular vote debacle?


Strawman argument and a backtracking from you.

Not even worthy of a response, to be honest.




posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:44 AM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight


So do nut cases that might go off the deep end and decide to go on a mass shooting spree.

So why not outlaw nut cases that go off the deep end and go on a shooting spree?

Oh, wait...

TheRedneck



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: InTheLight



Yes, have mandatory mental health reports, references from family and friends, a good reason to own a gun, gun training, and 10 round maximum.

too bad your founders didn't value your freedom as much as ours did




Is it a good freedom to allow regular citizens who are mentally ill and/or violent people to own guns and use them for killing?



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: InTheLight
define such

seems we have been here before

also we have a right, so your "need" is irrelevant



I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Your right is actually a want and not a need.





I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Where ?
I dont see it.



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight


So do nut cases that might go off the deep end and decide to go on a mass shooting spree.

So why not outlaw nut cases that go off the deep end and go on a shooting spree?

Oh, wait...

TheRedneck


A mental health background and references would take care of most of them, would it not?



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: InTheLight
define such

seems we have been here before

also we have a right, so your "need" is irrelevant



I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Your right is actually a want and not a need.





I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Where ?
I dont see it.


Ah, those who will not see...what was that quote again?



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

Yes, have mandatory mental health reports, references from family and friends, a good reason to own a gun, gun training, and 10 round maximum.


So you are no better than the person standing in from of a voting booth demanding a justification from someone before they can vote.





You mean like Trump was doing regarding the popular vote debacle?


Strawman argument and a backtracking from you.

Not even worthy of a response, to be honest.


You mean you have no response, to be honest. Same exact scenario in reverse.



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:47 AM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight


A mental health background and references would take care of most of them, would it not?

Without grabbing the guns.

TheRedneck



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: InTheLight

How 'bout this: If Australia is the no gun promised land for you, move there.


It's not about me, it's about finding solutions to your mass shooting problems.


You can ban all you want, but it won't solve the problem of angry young men looking to snap and hurt as many as they can. Guns are only one available route to harm others. We've seen it over and over in other places - remove the guns and they use bombs, cars, knives, trucks ... all manner of other things that do as much damage as guns ... *AND* they access guns illegally because nothing stops those who are determined. Anders Brevik, the Bataclan shootings, several instances of shootings in Australia carried out by terrorists, etc.

You want a solution? Figure out why so many young men are growing up disaffected and angry at life, the universe, and everything.

Guns have always been in the US. Mass shootings? Not so much.
edit on 6-9-2019 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

Yes, have mandatory mental health reports, references from family and friends, a good reason to own a gun, gun training, and 10 round maximum.


So you are no better than the person standing in from of a voting booth demanding a justification from someone before they can vote.





You mean like Trump was doing regarding the popular vote debacle?


Strawman argument and a backtracking from you.

Not even worthy of a response, to be honest.


You mean you have no response, to be honest. Same exact scenario in reverse.


No.

Now you're making things up because you have stated that people need to "justify" exercising their rights.

Which is the antithesis of "rights".



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: InTheLight
define such

seems we have been here before

also we have a right, so your "need" is irrelevant



I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Your right is actually a want and not a need.





I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Where ?
I dont see it.


Ah, those who will not see...what was that quote again?

Are you ok ?



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:49 AM
link   


The Second is not about hunting, collecting, target shooting, joining a militia or any of that.


That is worth repeating.

What some people want to believe today doesn't change the original intent.



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

Yes, have mandatory mental health reports, references from family and friends, a good reason to own a gun, gun training, and 10 round maximum.


So you are no better than the person standing in from of a voting booth demanding a justification from someone before they can vote.





You mean like Trump was doing regarding the popular vote debacle?


Strawman argument and a backtracking from you.

Not even worthy of a response, to be honest.


You mean you have no response, to be honest. Same exact scenario in reverse.


No.

Now you're making things up because you have stated that people need to "justify" exercising their rights.

Which is the antithesis of "rights".


So it's okay with you that a potentially violent person can exercise their rights to obtain a semiautomatic weapon just because they want it?



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: InTheLight
define such

seems we have been here before

also we have a right, so your "need" is irrelevant



I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Your right is actually a want and not a need.





I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Where ?
I dont see it.


Ah, those who will not see...what was that quote again?

Are you ok ?


I am ok are you ok? Did you read that book?



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: InTheLight

Yes, have mandatory mental health reports, references from family and friends, a good reason to own a gun, gun training, and 10 round maximum.


So you are no better than the person standing in from of a voting booth demanding a justification from someone before they can vote.





You mean like Trump was doing regarding the popular vote debacle?


Strawman argument and a backtracking from you.

Not even worthy of a response, to be honest.


You mean you have no response, to be honest. Same exact scenario in reverse.


No.

Now you're making things up because you have stated that people need to "justify" exercising their rights.

Which is the antithesis of "rights".


So it's okay with you that a potentially violent person can exercise their rights to obtain a semiautomatic weapon just because they want it?


Yes.

because everyone is "potentially violent".

Is this your justification for gun confiscation?

Because everyone can be "potentially violent" at any given time.



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: InTheLight
define such

seems we have been here before

also we have a right, so your "need" is irrelevant



I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Your right is actually a want and not a need.





I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Where ?
I dont see it.


Ah, those who will not see...what was that quote again?

Are you ok ?


I am ok are you ok? Did you read that book?

I have read a lot of books.
The problem is , I have yet to read a valid debate point.
If you posted a book related to the subject , please let me know the title.

edit on 9/6/19 by Gothmog because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:52 AM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight



your mass shooting problems

in 2018 387 people died in "mass shootings"
I would say these problems are much larger and merit more attention

Heart disease 647,457
Cancer 599,108
Unintentional injuries 169,936
Chronic lower respiratory disease 160,201
Stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 146,383
Alzheimer's disease 121,404
Diabetes 83,586
Influenza and pneumonia 55,672

All just as preventable
why arent you protesting these?



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: InTheLight

How 'bout this: If Australia is the no gun promised land for you, move there.


It's not about me, it's about finding solutions to your mass shooting problems.


You can ban all you want, but it won't solve the problem of angry young men looking to snap and hurt as many as they can. Guns are only one available route to harm others. We've seen it over and over in other places - remove the guns and they use bombs, cars, knives, trucks ... all manner of other things that do as much damage as guns ... *AND* they access guns illegally because nothing stops those who are determined. Anders Brevik, the Bataclan shootings, several instances of shootings in Australia carried out by terrorists, etc.

You want a solution? Figure out why so many young men are growing up disaffected and angry at life, the universe, and everything.

Guns have always been in the US. Mass shootings? Not so much.


I am for banning high capacity round magazines. I think it is a good compromise.



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: InTheLight
define such

seems we have been here before

also we have a right, so your "need" is irrelevant



I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Your right is actually a want and not a need.





I have defined it quite clearly, you can't accept it.

Where ?
I dont see it.


Ah, those who will not see...what was that quote again?

Are you ok ?


I am ok are you ok? Did you read that book?

I have read a lot of books.


No, I mean adult nonfiction books.



posted on Sep, 6 2019 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight


Ah, those who will not see...

Then see.


No guns used.


No guns used.

TheRedneck



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join