Not everybody has to have a soul

originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

I can never be wrong about my own being, because my own being is absolute truth, when I understand absolute truth as existing within the context of myself.

Nope, you can be wrong.

Even with wordplay.

If you're unwilling to accept that you are a fool.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Nope, wrong does not mean what you think it does.

originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Nope, wrong does not mean what you think it does.

Ahhh more wordplay.

People who know what they are talking about give clear answers.

But you made a bold statement, you claimed to know my definition of wrong, and claimed to know the "real" definition.

Care to elaborate?

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Its not just about your definition of wrong, but what your epistemical methods are for determining both if something is right or wrong, or if it can be wrong.

originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Its not just about your definition of wrong, but what your epistemical methods are for determining both if something is right or wrong, or if it can be wrong.

OK then, I'll play along...

What are my epistemical methods and why are they incorrect?

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

I don't know what your epistemic methods are, so I will start with mine. My epistemic method is rooted in a solipsistic viewpoint. I have to explore something for myself to determine if it is real or not. I can't trust that others have sufficiently disproved something, such as the existence of magic, if it doesn't work for them specifically. I can't trust them because they are part of the matrix experience I am having, so I cannot trust their experiences, I can only trust my own.

a reply to: SourceTruth
Your methods don't seem to be rooted in a solipsistic viewpoint.

Here's a quick guide.
I think therefore I am.... Solipsism
I think therefore the matrix controls everything and I'm ever so special.... Not solipsism.

But if we could go back a few steps, you dodged my question. You claimed that I was wrong, then claimed my epistemical methods were the problem. Now you're claiming you don't know what my epistemical methods are.

Does that mean I'm right?

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

I have advanced a solipsistic viewpoint into my current positions of a matrix and other derivative positions.
Solipsism would indeed make me special though.

I am not dodging the question, because this is a more fundamental issue that needs to be addressed before your question can be sufficiently addressed.

a reply to: SourceTruth

Oh sweet pendulum divine
Show me the truth I cannot find
By sylvan wood and far flung sea
I swear that I'll be true to thee

originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar
I have advanced a solipsistic viewpoint into my current positions of a matrix and other derivative positions.
Solipsism would indeed make me special though.

I think you've confused Solipsism with narcissism.

If you actually incorporated Solipsism we would both agree that there is no way for you to know what you claim to.

As a Believer in Yahweh, Yeshua and the afterlife, as told by many NDE accounts, I agree with you SourceTruth that not all people on earth have souls.

There are many people here that are Angels. Angels don't have souls. Also not all angels are good. According to scripture of the Holy Bible, which I've studied for many years and know quite well, 1/3 of all angels were cast down and are considered fallen and they have nothing but hatred for real humans. Most would know of these as demons or devils. I'm sure we all here have come across many demons in our time on earth.

The greatest lie the devil did was to convince mankind that God does not exist.

Sirric

a reply to: sirric

Indeed. It definitely seems that we are in some sort of construct, and that soulless ones are just part of that construct.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

What is it that I "claim to know"?
I think you have confused solipsism with non-narcissism.

a reply to: SourceTruth
You claim to know if others have souls.

Can you explain how a solipsistic viewpoint can help in understanding if someone else has a soul?

originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: sirric

Indeed. It definitely seems that we are in some sort of construct, and that soulless ones are just part of that construct.

Indeed?
So are you following the Bible now or are you being disingenuous with your response?

Why say "indeed" to something you disagree with unless you are trying to manipulate people?

Definitely leaning more and more towards you being fat Carmen sandiego or at least working with her.

a edeply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Stop straw-manning me, they do not give your accusations any weight.

You made this strawman accusation before.

a reply to: SourceTruth
Hmmm it seems like you are reacting and not responding.

But I'm allowed to have my theories also.
You can think I have no soul, and I can think you have poor taste in hats.

Fair is fair.

But way to dodge the question....
Again.

originally posted by: SourceTruth
Stop straw-manning me, they do not give your accusations any weight.

You made this strawman accusation before.

Correct-ish, not a strawman but accusing you of being a fat meth addict doesn't help my argument in the slightest.

I should be trying to expand both our minds and these childish attacks on your potential weight and fashion issues aren't productive.

Perhaps we could get back to the topic...

Can you explain how a solipsistic viewpoint can help in understanding if someone else has a soul?

Double post, would've been such a good mic drop too. Oh well.


And just for clarification, I brought the previous post to the attention of the mods and agree with their decision.

I wouldn't appreciate my picture showing up regardless of what I had said.