It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: midicon
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: dffrntkndfnml
Well yeah, the focus of this js not on trying to distinguish who is a soul and who isn't, it is more about realjzing that you are the soul and that you are able to awaken in a way that the soulless ones don't.
And what have you done so far with this 'awakening'?
I have been able to realize that I have the power to become my own creator of my experience.
The weird and wonderful thing is.... there is no creator and no experiencer.
What is IS!
Could what is appearing be any different than it is?
What IS happening IS.
The assumption maybe that, there is a you separate to what is.
I see what you are saying, I have heard this before.
This is just an experience, that is taking place through time "somewhere". It is an experience of information that is taking place somewhere. That somewhere is what source is.
'Somewhere' is just a story appearing.
Time is also just a story.
What is IS.
One without a second.... non duality means; just this that is.
'What is' can appear as stories about 'what isn't"!!
What is must have been brought to the point of being what is.
There is what is, but how did what is become what is? How did the story appear? What brought the story to appear?
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: midicon
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: dffrntkndfnml
Well yeah, the focus of this js not on trying to distinguish who is a soul and who isn't, it is more about realjzing that you are the soul and that you are able to awaken in a way that the soulless ones don't.
And what have you done so far with this 'awakening'?
I have been able to realize that I have the power to become my own creator of my experience.
The weird and wonderful thing is.... there is no creator and no experiencer.
What is IS!
Could what is appearing be any different than it is?
What IS happening IS.
The assumption maybe that, there is a you separate to what is.
I see what you are saying, I have heard this before.
This is just an experience, that is taking place through time "somewhere". It is an experience of information that is taking place somewhere. That somewhere is what source is.
'Somewhere' is just a story appearing.
Time is also just a story.
What is IS.
One without a second.... non duality means; just this that is.
'What is' can appear as stories about 'what isn't"!!
What is must have been brought to the point of being what is.
There is what is, but how did what is become what is? How did the story appear? What brought the story to appear?
The assumption is that what is became what is..... but it is simply being what is.
Not two.
Well, I asked you to give me a topic to discuss. Why can't you give me a topic to discuss?
What is does not have to be what appears as what is to us, what appears to us is what came to be, tarting and emergin from what is.
You may be mislead to believe that the emotional aspect of sex is higher, but it is really not so.
I don't understand what those like you are doing on a conspiracy forum.
You are just another dismissive person.
This forum is created for people who have unconventional ideas that don't fit with the mainstream narrative. I am one of those people with such unconventional thinking.
None of you seem to actually have any unconventional ways of thinking.
so I will just say to anyone who reads this not to be swayed by the way that these kinds of people bash these kinds of topics, because they really do not know any better, and they do not know anything about these kinds of topics.
Everything I have talked about the matrix is unconventional thinking, so you are wrong.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SourceTruth
What is does not have to be what appears as what is to us, what appears to us is what came to be, tarting and emergin from what is.
You should check this out:
www.yodaspeak.co.uk...
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: InhaleExhale
I wanted a topic I could analyze.
originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: InhaleExhale
I wanted a topic I could analyze.
Really, can you show me an example of your analysis? Seems like you just believe everything she says.
Except for the money part of course.
Cheapskate.
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar
Do I have a justification for agreeing with her?
originally posted by: SourceTruth
If we do not know for sure that everyone has a soul, then we should not assume so.
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar
I am not making a judgement, I am actually arguing against making a certain judgement. Judging that everyone has a soul based on the concept of souls is the judgement I am pointing out. I am saying that we should not make this certain judgement.
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar
No, I wouldn't because it is self evident from my perspective that I have a soul. This is the problem, relative to the observer it is self evident that they have a soul but it is not self evident that others that the observer observes have souls.