It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The majority of Jews would want no part of the New World Order a.k.a. "globalization" if they understood its undemocratic character and how they are being used.
The true Jewish spirit holds that truth and morality are absolute and cannot be trimmed to fit one's perceived self interest. G.J. Nueberger expresses this spirit in his essay "The Great Gulf Between Zionism and Judaism."
"The Jewish people are chosen not for domination over others, not for conquest or warfare, but to serve G-d and thus to serve mankind...Thus physical violence is not a tradition or a value of the Jews. The task for which the Jewish people were chosen is not to set an example of military superiority or technical achievements, but to seek perfection in moral behaviour and spiritual purity.
Of all the crimes of political Zionism, the worst and most basic, and which explains all its other misdeeds, is that from its beginning Zionism has sought to separate the Jewish people from their G-d, to render the divine covenant null and void, and to substitute a "modern" statehood and fraudulent sovereignty for the lofty ideals of the Jewish people."
The bankers obviously aren't concerned about true Judaism or racial purity and were quite willing to sacrifice millions of Jews to achieve their design by backing Hitler. They are sacrificing thousands more Jewish, American and Muslim lives in the Middle East in their Orwellian "perpetual war for perpetual peace."
Does the New World Order serve a "Jewish" agenda or a banker elite agenda?
I would venture that it serves the latter, and the Jewish people are an instrument of this agenda like so many other people.
By giving private individuals the ability to create money out of nothing, we have created a monster which threatens to devour the planet and with it the human race.
Pursuant to your request, I will attempt to clear up questions you have about the Federal Reserve Bank (FED). I spent much time researching the FED and these are the shocking and revealing conclusions.
THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS A PRIVATE COMPANY.
Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution states that Congress shall have the power to coin (create) money and regulate the value thereof. Today however, the FED, which is a privately owned company, controls and profits by printing money through the Treasury, and regulating its value.
The FED began with approximately 300 people or banks that became owners (stockholders purchasing stock at $100 per share - the stock is not publicly traded) in the Federal Reserve Banking System. They make up an international banking cartel of wealth beyond comparison (Reference 1, 14). The FED banking system collects billions of dollars (Reference 8, 17) in interest annually and distributes the profits to its shareholders. The Congress illegally gave the FED the right to print money (through the Treasury) at no interest to the FED. The FED creates money from nothing, and loans it back to us through banks, and charges interest on our currency. The FED also buys Government debt with money printed on a printing press and charges U.S. taxpayers interest. Many Congressmen and Presidents say this is fraud (Reference 1,2,3,5,17).
Who actually owns the Federal Reserve Central Banks? The ownership of the 12 Central banks, a very well kept secret, has been revealed:
Rothschild Bank of London
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Lehman Brothers of New York
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
(Reference 14, P. 13, Reference 12, P. 152)
These bankers are connected to London Banking Houses which ultimately control the FED. When England lost the Revolutionary War with America (our forefathers were fighting their own government), they planned to control us by controlling our banking system, the printing of our money, and our debt (Reference 4, 22).
"The Secrets of the Federal Reserve" by Eustace Mullins
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies." ---Thomas Jefferson
In November 1949, Eustace Mullins, 25, was a researcher in Washington DC when friends invited him to visit the famous American poet Ezra Pound, who was confined at St. Elizabeth's Mental Hospital and listed as a "political prisoner."
A leading figure in Modern English literature, Pound was the editor and critic who introduced the world to James Joyce, W.B. Yeats and T.S. Eliot. During the Second World War, he was charged with treason for broadcasts on Rome Radio that questioned the motives behind America's involvement.
Pound commissioned Mullins to examine the influence of the banking establishment on U.S. policy. Mullins spent every morning for two years in the Library of Congress and met with Pound every afternoon. The resulting manuscript, "The Secrets of the Federal Reserve" proved too hot for any American publisher to handle. Nineteen rejected it. One said, "you'll never get this published in New York." When it finally appeared in Germany in 1955, the U.S. Military Government confiscated all 10,000 copies and burned them.
It appears that the greater majority of the American public have not kept pace with the rapidly developing neocon “Bush Doctrine” of pre-emptive military strikes against sovereign states as laid out in last Septembers National Security Strategy. A strategy expressly forbidden and outlawed in the Geneva Convention and Nuremberg Treaty but long sought after by neocons seeking a global American empire predicated on military force. A doctrine that establishes the unquestioned sovereignty of the United States over any an all international laws while subjecting all other sovereign states to yield to the power of its military might. As James Kurth of Swarthmore College recently stated in an article in the National Interest, “Today there is only one empire, the global empire of the United States.”
In this troubled post modern era, the United States has chosen to embrace a doctrine of force heading down a roadmap of unilateralism in international affairs that leads in only one direction, universalistic nationalism.
In the publication known as Foreign Policy an article written by Christopher Layne, a senior fellow in foreign policy studies at Cato Institute and Benjamin Schwartz, an analyst in the International Policy Department at the Rand Corporation entitled, "American Hegemony Without an Enemy," write,
After World War II Washington sought an international order based upon preponderant (American) power. That objective had very little to do with any existing or projected Soviet actions; in fact, American statesmen knew that their wide-ranging objective (of world domination) would increase Soviet insecurity and thereby the risk of war.
If fear of Soviet expansion had been the ... (real) reason to bring Western Europe and East Asia under the America security umbrella ... why does Washington continue to insist that an American-led NATO and the U.S. defense commitments to East Asia are still indispensable to America's security (after the demise of the Soviet Union)? The answer is that the basic aspiration of U.S. security policy since the Second World War has not been to contain the Soviets ... The Cold War (merely) provided the ... (excuse) for the strategy of (American) preponderance ... (The reality is that) American foreign policy ... springs from the ... outlook ... that (America must link the world to itself economically) ... and it is not an exaggeration to suggest that ... (this) has ... inexorably resulted in a globe-girdling empire.
To truly appreciate this unbridled intolerance and aggressive reshaping of a “New World Order” of American imperialism, it is necessary that we go backward in time to gain a better perspective of the neocons and their utopian goal of an unchallenged American superpower acting as the benevolent global hegemon.
Originally posted by Realist05
Help. I Don't get it. The Jewish kids I grew up with, conservative, orthodox or liberal, all support Israel and immigration to same. The catholics and protestants could have cared less.
To say that Judiasm and Zionism have nothing to do with each other seems like saying Islam and Wahabism don't.
June 23, 1998: In a speech to the "Collateral Damage Conference" of the Cato Institute, Cheney said, "the good Lord didn't see fit to put oil and gas only where there are democratically elected regimes friendly to the United States. Occasionally we have to operate in places where, all things considered, one would not normally choose to go. But, we go where the business is."
"Why do you rob banks?"
"That's where the money is!"
Willie Sutton, famous bank robber
Why did the US invade Iraq?
That's where more than 10 percent
of the remaining oil is.
The fundamental essence of PNAC's ideology can be found in a White Paper
produced in September of 2000 entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses:
Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century." In it, PNAC outlines
what is required of America to create the global empire they envision.
According to PNAC, America must:
* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia
and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft,
submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a
strategic dominance of space;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic
product, up from the 3 percent currently spent.
Most ominously, this PNAC document described four "Core Missions" for the
American military. The two central requirements are for American forces to
"fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars," and
to "perform the 'constabulary' duties associated with shaping the security
environment in critical regions." Note well that PNAC does not want America
to be prepared to fight simultaneous major wars. That is old school. In
order to bring this plan to fruition, the military must fight these wars
one way or the other to establish American dominance for all to see.
Why is this important? After all, wacky think tanks are a cottage industry
in Washington, DC. They are a dime a dozen. In what way does PNAC stand
above the other groups that would set American foreign policy if they could?
Two events brought PNAC into the mainstream of American government: the
disputed election of George W. Bush, and the attacks of September 11th.
When Bush assumed the Presidency, the men who created and nurtured the
imperial dreams of PNAC became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense
Department and the White House. When the Towers came down, these men saw,
at long last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive
George W. Bush gave a speech Wednesday night before the Godfather of conservative Washington think tanks, the American Enterprise Institute. In his speech, Bush quantified his coming war with Iraq as part of a larger struggle to bring pro-western governments into power in the Middle East. Couched in hopeful language describing peace and freedom for all, the speech was in fact the closest articulation of the actual plan for Iraq that has yet been heard from the administration.
In a previous article from February 21, the ideological connections between an extremist right-wing Washington think tank and the foreign policy aspirations of the Bush administration were detailed.
The Project for a New American Century, or PNAC, is a group founded in 1997 that has been agitating since its inception for a war with Iraq. PNAC was the driving force behind the drafting and passage of the Iraqi Liberation Act, a bill that painted a veneer of legality over the ultimate designs behind such a conflict. The names of every prominent PNAC member were on a letter delivered to President Clinton in 1998 which castigated him for not implementing the Act by driving troops into Baghdad.
PNAC has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to a Hussein opposition group called the Iraqi National Congress, and to Iraq's heir-apparent, Ahmed Chalabi, despite the fact that Chalabi was sentenced in absentia by a Jordanian court to 22 years in prison on 31 counts of bank fraud. Chalabi and the INC have, over the years, gathered support for their cause by promising oil contracts to anyone that would help to put them in power in Iraq.
On September 17, 2002 the Bush administration published its “National Security Strategy of the United States of America.” So far, there has been no serious examination of this important document in the establishment media. This is unfortunate, to say the least, because this document advances the political and theoretical justification for a colossal escalation of American militarism. The document asserts as the guiding policy of the United States the right to use military force anywhere in the world, at any time it chooses, against any country it believes to be, or it believes may at some point become, a threat to American interests. No other country in modern history, not even Nazi Germany at the height of Hitler’s madness, has asserted such a sweeping claim to global hegemony—or, to put it more bluntly, world domination—as is now being made by the United States.
The message of this document, stripped of its cynical euphemisms and calculated evasions, is unmistakably clear: The United States government asserts the right to bomb, invade and destroy whatever country it chooses. It refuses to respect as a matter of international law the sovereignty of any other country, and reserves the right to get rid of any regime, in any part of the world, that is, appears to be, or might some day become, hostile to what the United States considers to be its vital interests. Its threats are directed, in the short term, against so-called “failed states”—that is, former colonies and impoverished Third World countries ravaged by the predatory policies of imperialism. But larger competitors of the United States, whom the document refers to, in a revival of pre-World War II imperialist jargon, as “Great Powers,” are by no means out of the gun sights of the Bush administration. The wars against small and defenseless states that the United States is now preparing—first of all against Iraq—will prove to be the preparation for military onslaughts against more formidable targets.
Few writers are more ambitious than the writers of government policy papers, and few policy papers are more ambitious than Dick Cheney’s masterwork. It has taken several forms over the last decade and is in fact the product of several ghostwriters (notably Paul Wolfowitz and Colin Powell), but Cheney has been consistent in his dedication to the ideas in the documents that bear his name, and he has maintained a close association with the ideologues behind them. Let us, therefore, call Cheney the author, and this series of documents the Plan.
The Plan was published in unclassified form most recently under the title of Defense Strategy for the 1990s, (pdf) as Cheney ended his term as secretary of defense under the elder George Bush in early 1993, but it is, like “Leaves of Grass,” a perpetually evolving work. It was the controversial Defense Planning Guidance draft of 1992 – from which Cheney, unconvincingly, tried to distance himself – and it was the somewhat less aggressive revised draft of that same year. This June it was a presidential lecture in the form of a commencement address at West Point, and in July it was leaked to the press as yet another Defense Planning Guidance (this time under the pen name of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld). It will take its ultimate form, though, as America’s new national security strategy – and Cheney et al. will experience what few writers have even dared dream: their words will become our reality.
The Plan is for the United States to rule the world. The overt theme is unilateralism, but it is ultimately a story of domination. It calls for the United States to maintain its overwhelming military superiority and prevent new rivals from rising up to challenge it on the world stage. It calls for dominion over friends and enemies alike. It says not that the United States must be more powerful, or most powerful, but that it must be absolutely powerful.
The main substantive ideas in this paper emerge from a discussion in which prominent opinion makers, including Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser participated. The report, entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," is the framework for a series of follow-up reports on strategy.
Israel has a large problem. Labor Zionism, which for 70 years has dominated the Zionist movement, has generated a stalled and shackled economy. Efforts to salvage Israel’s socialist institutions—which include pursuing supranational over national sovereignty and pursuing a peace process that embraces the slogan, "New Middle East"—undermine the legitimacy of the nation and lead Israel into strategic paralysis and the previous government’s "peace process." That peace process obscured the evidence of eroding national critical mass— including a palpable sense of national exhaustion—and forfeited strategic initiative. The loss of national critical mass was illustrated best by Israel’s efforts to draw in the United States to sell unpopular policies domestically, to agree to negotiate sovereignty over its capital, and to respond with resignation to a spate of terror so intense and tragic that it deterred Israelis from engaging in normal daily functions, such as commuting to work in buses.
Benjamin Netanyahu’s government comes in with a new set of ideas. While there are those who will counsel continuity, Israel has the opportunity to make a clean break; it can forge a peace process and strategy based on an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism, the starting point of which must be economic reform. To secure the nation’s streets and borders in the immediate future, Israel can:
…prominent opinion makers, including Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser participated…
This reads like a “Who’s Who” of global Zionist/neocon corruption and control one only needs to view my first post in this thread and follow up the links to learn more about most of these individuals, and others…
…Forge a new basis for relations with the United States—stressing self-reliance, maturity, strategic cooperation on areas of mutual concern, and furthering values inherent to the West. This can only be done if Israel takes serious steps to terminate aid, which prevents economic reform…
This is the process underway currently, and can and should be viewed as the strings of the puppet master(s) which control the American elite.
· …striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan.
· paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces.
· striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper…
These should make anyone who’s been following the news lately hold a bit more of a clear view of current actions as they are unflolding…
Oh, additionally, the habit of quoting authors that are against Israel or Jewish people and noting that "he's Jewish too and look what he says" is nauseating. Is that supposed to establish credibility? He was born Jewish therefore he knows all the secrets or something? Honestly...
Originally posted by Seraphim_Serpente
That last post by Djarums looks & sounds like a desperate move to me - the "Oh you can't be serious - You people don't know what you are Talking about" move. How are you going to tell people with personal experience of these things that they don't know what they are talking about?
I think most people know the Truth by now anyhow! Thanks for your voice & telling the Truth Xatnys! ZIONISM is a very REAL Phenomenon! The U.S.A. & U.K. will back up the MODERN STATE of ISRAEL (no connection to the "Israel" in the Bible BTW - if you believe that then you have been Purposely DECEIVED - those people in the Pictures are REAL Rabbi's - last time I checked George W. Bush & Dick Cheney &
Richard Pearl & Douglas Feith & Bill Krystal & Donald Rumsfeld are NOT RABBI's) - NO MATTER WHAT - all the way until the End of the World! Karma is a very REAL Phenomenon too BTW - what goes around comes around - the Zionists should have learned this by now!
A Zionist is as much of a "Terrorist" as the Radical Islamists! REAL Jews & Christians & Moslems live together in PEACE out of Respect for GOD & EACH OTHER!
Originally posted by serge
Here are some more interesting texts:
The iniquity article really struck "home" with me, if you're a Christian this one is probably an invaluable read. The relavant parts are in it are:
->History of the early church (1st century)
->The twelve tribes of Israel
->The influences of 'Judaism' on the early Christian Chruch.
If you're into conspiracy theories, have read up on the lumi's, and are a student of history - having you read those - would love to see some dialog from you.
Originally posted by St Udio
Xatnys...there seems more than a few that are following the thread
i can appreciate your trying to downplay the 'religious' linkage
but you cannot Divorce the 'religious aspects' from the system
of 'blood-bankers'...they use it for their purposes,no?
it may be a better description to say that
NeoCons & Zionists are actually secular, a-religious, worldly mindsets
the Vatican is also the practical world counterpart of 'spiritual' Catholicism
perhaps your expose is better left under-the-radar, even misunderstood
and wrapped in a haze of supposed bias...
(note the recent 'open season' on Judges in the recent news items)
[edit on 11-3-2005 by St Udio]
Originally posted by Paul Horrorshow
Excellent stuff as always Xatnys, unfortunently I havnt been able to post much recently as most of my term papers are due in March, and of course Exams folow in April. Nonetheless, it is interesting that no-one had actually perused the actual PNAC website (I posted the link on the first page). Through their documentation, one can readily see the path to Zionist domination through exploiting the general apathy towards policy by congressman and senators, that is the secret of the PNAC and other Zionist lobby groups, they are persistent and belligerent, unable to recognize fault in their doctrine and relentless in smearing/attacking those lobby groups or think-tanks that oppose them. ALso their financial reserves are enormous, and hold a lot of political experience of moulding the GOP...its been going on since 1982, and also, Richard Perle, a policy guru for the zionist lobbyists, originally backed a Democrat who was a staunch anti-communist, they really hold no alligences other than to the political/economic agenda of the zionist movement...after all, look at the Federal Reserve article posted above, it lends some credence that this cabal is not purely motivated by political power, after all, one with the resources makes the policies in the end, the old colloquialism that 'money begets power' is not without merit!
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Since what you call "Zionism" has been around for decades and the PNAC think tank is only 8 years old, are you suggesting Zionism is responsible for the assembling of the PNAC members?
Since It wasn't the Neo-Cons who made possible the creation of Israel (Created in one day as told in the Bible), how are they connected?
What political agenda does "Zionism" have? As far as I can tell, Israel is a small nation-state that is trying to survive, surrounded by countries that are sworn to her demise for no other reason but their blood line. Help connect the dots for me, as I see no huge conspiracy with Israel; At least not one where Israel is the blood-thirsty entity set on a mission to take over the world.
Originally posted by Seraphim_Serpente
Quote: "Since it wasn't the Neo-Cons who made possible the creation of Israel (Created in one day as told in the Bible) how are they connected?"
The "Israel" in the Bible (Means Righteous & Chosen of God) has NOTHING to do with the MODERN STATE of ISRAEL! We are ALL the People of God! Do you have any idea how many people can Trace their Lineage back to "Abrahamic Roots" - what are we all supposed to abandon our Native Countries now & Migrate to Israel? Well you are more than welcome to - I for one am staying right were I am!
Quote: "What Political Agenda does "Zionism" have? As far as I can tell, Israel is a small nation-state that is trying to Survive."
By use of BRUTAL FORCE - in a Place that it doesn't belong in the first place! Gee I wonder why all of the Moslems are Freaking out down there in the Middle East - are they all having a Bad Hair Day or is there some Foreign Entity with Super Funding (Ah now I know were all of my TAX Dollars are going - THANKS Crazy Fundamentalist Politicians) & Military Support by U.S.A. & U.K. driving TANKS down the Street &
*Shooting 15 year old Palestinian Boys* armed with (get this) ROCKS!
The State of Israel claims its Sovereignty based on the Hebraic Scriptures because supposedly "God Said" the land is theirs - Gee do you think that "GOD" will be coming down to Earth any time soon to straighten it all out (Sarcastic)!
On the other hand I actually do Hope that Jesus will Come Back to Earth soon to settle all of this Monkey NON-SENSE out - I have had ENOUGH of it!
[edit on 11-3-2005 by Seraphim_Serpente]
[edit on 11-3-2005 by Seraphim_Serpente]