originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Sookiechacha
When you consider there is another thread where people are complaining that we ain't having enough babies and its gonna result in the white majority
being replace by immigrant minorities..
Ya, just one big right wing circle jerk, pat each other on the back, assure each other your way is the right way..
And of course, liberals are the demonic enemies of the American way..
You are right there is another thread like that.
But some people, like me, think it is a good thing in the end.
With the coming AI robotic revolution, humans will be mostly unneeded and unnecessary to run basic services and create goods. We need far far fewer
humans or will face a huge crisis of people with no jobs and who will forced to live purposeless and useless lives.
The causes are many and some include feminism, but definitely not all. But it is a good thing overall for XX to choose not to reproduce. In the
short term it will hurt as economies will fall into the inevitable "2nd great depression". They will fall and collapse trying to support the elderly
with too few young people. But in the long run it is good when robotic AI's take over the vast majority of jobs, and economies recover from the fall,
in the long long run, it will be good as we enter into the AI robotic era.
So make the choice freely to "save the environment" as progressive liberals say and stop having children, per AOC and pop stars. Join the human
extinction movement that has sprung up among the "woke".
XX, make the choice to use birth control, realize that it sometimes fails.
So, make the choice to also insist on condoms, make the choice to add spermicide,
make good choices so you don't have to make the choice to let fetal tissue fully develop and breathe or not breathe.
In today's society it is unreasonable to ask XX not to have intercourse with whomever they choose, whenever they choose, not going to happen in the
"swipe right" all consensual adult sexual gratification is a basic human right, new morality, in today's society. So make the choice that will
prevent you having to make the choice. Otherwise, it is even more of your choice and less of XY's responsibility.
Just don't make XY pay for your choices, or lack thereof, in the name of morality (what is "right") if you have eschewed traditional morality as
basically outdated or oppressive or even the latest accusation, terroristic. If you won't realize that traditional morality has a place and purpose,
then at least acknowledge that today's "new morality" is really no better because of the unintended consequences and ever changing idea of what is
moral and what is immoral.
Today's "new morality" is just as oppressive and totalitarian as progressive liberals claim traditional morality is.
The "new morality" believes in: destroying people's lives and livelihoods for the wrong word, even said 14 years ago;
rioting when a person is invited to speak on campus and just might say something progressive liberals don't like;
committing "justified" violence at the sight of a hat or T-shirt with a message the progressive liberals don't like;
trapping business owners purposely into situations where they demand artists create works of art, or business owners create celebrations they feel are
immoral so the "new morality" can make examples out of them of what happens when you don't follow their "new morals" by destroying their lives and
In the case of consensual adult intercourse between unmarried people:
XX if you make the choice not to use enough birth control to prevent pregnancy, and it IS your choice. Then you choose, and it IS your choice not
to abort. Don't be someone in the "new morality" who believes you have to have a toxic, oppressive, man (who you have taken the choice away from)
take care of you because you made a choice you can't live with alone.
Although, I have to admit that today's "new morality" has as one of it's highest tenants that "rich oppressors" are obligated to pay for the needs and
wants of the oppressed, of which XX consider themselves.
So now I see why XX demands that toxic oppressors "take care of them" when they make a choice that results in them being unable to care for
themselves, a bit hypocritical, don't you think? Bash the oppressors, call them horrid names, make them feel like pieces of dung and then tell them
they have to be your ATM?
What ever happened to "I am woman hear me roar"? Women don't need men to care for them independence?
Which has evolved in today's new morality into, give me freedom to make my own choices, treat me as an equal who is independent from the oppressive
XY, BUT the historically evil horrid oppressive XY is obligated to pay for my choices if they don't work out.
edit on 9/2/19 by The2Billies because: addition grammar