It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Prince Andrew and the establishment. When will justice be served.

page: 1
24
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 10:19 AM
link   

The Duke of York believes that claims made against him by a “sex slave” of the paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein “feel like a witch-hunt with absolutely no evidence” of any wrongdoing the Evening Standard can reveal.



Prince Andrew has faced allegations that he had sex three times with Ms Roberts, 36, now known as Virginia Roberts Giuffre, when she was 17. The prince has “categorically” denied the claims. The source insisted Andrew does not remember ever meeting Miss Roberts and also cast doubt on a photograph showing them together in 2001.


So urce

How many more years must pass before the royal family and establishment are exposed completely... I’m talking about Elm Guest house, Savile, Isle of Jersey, The Kray twins supplying boys for Boothby and other government figures etc etc etc etc etc etc... (the list just goes on and on)

The entire thing goes so deep and far, I really hope I see justice in my lifetime

edit on 28/8/2019 by JPtruther because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 10:30 AM
link   
He had sex with a completely grown-up beautiful 17 year old? So what?



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: schuyler

She was "supplied"?



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 10:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: schuyler
He had sex with a completely grown-up beautiful 17 year old? So what?


It’s just a little sex trafficking, amirite? So what.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

And he was friends with a convicted paedophile, too.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 11:18 AM
link   
They have been exposed for a long time. When will justice stand up? It took a year or two from Bill Clinton's infamous "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" remark until he finally got impeached.

With the Queen head of state she is above the law, the judges take their direction from her. Thats the law. This scandal does have the potential for the public to question the monarchy and get rid of it. Who will be the next head of state and under what law will be the next battle ground if it does go this way.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 11:27 AM
link   
a reply to: schuyler




He had sex with a completely grown-up beautiful 17 year old? So what?

She was underage in the place they (allegedly) had sex making it a criminal act.

a reply to: JPtruther
You know as well as I do nothing will happen to him , he's a Royal.

Personally I'd send him to the Tower never to be seen or heard of again.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: JPtruther




How many more years must pass before the royal family and establishment are exposed completely...


They have been exposed completely for many years now. Lots of good books. Dope inc. is one to read.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 11:33 AM
link   
17 is legal. What she did before she was 17 is unproven. Further, if you have read through the trial transcripts you begin to see that she was going for broke, fame and fortune, trying to market a book, etc. She wasn't just some poor child wondering what had happened to her. She was fully aware and taking advantage of the situation.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 11:36 AM
link   
a reply to: schuyler

Some states 17 is legal, but I'd be willing to bet that if money is a factor, it changes the nature of consent for a minor. You can't just pimp out 17 year old's in states where the age of consent is 16, it becomes trafficking minors all the same.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 11:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: Shamrock6

And he was friends with a convicted paedophile, too.


Come on , everyone has a friend that has been arrested as a pedophile and continue to be friends with them. Am I. Right.

Also this pedophilia and sex trafficking thing is overblown with non real victims. The real victims are those adults who decide to do drugs in their house . We need the war on drugs not against these so called innocent kids.

To the op , there will be no justice served , the people running the show are clearly some sick f who want very little attention on sex trade and pedophiles.

They rather you focus and go to war with adults that willingly chose to buy and sell drugs in their own home than children and real victims in the sex trade.



edit on 46831America/ChicagoWed, 28 Aug 2019 11:46:26 -0500000000p3142 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 11:54 AM
link   
a reply to: schuyler


Among them is Virginia Roberts Giuffre. She has said she was a 15-year-old working at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club when she was recruited to perform sex acts on Epstein. Giuffre said in a sworn affidavit that she was flown on Epstein’s private planes to his properties in New Mexico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Paris and New York, and said meetings were also arranged for sex in London and elsewhere with Prince Andrew.


LA Times

15 isn’t 17. Being paid to screw people at 17 isn’t legal, regardless of the age of consent.

Your initial comment is still gross, sorry.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 12:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: schuyler
He had sex with a completely grown-up beautiful 17 year old? So what?


It’s just a little sex trafficking, amirite? So what.


Yes, thank you


One of the biggest claims is that these girls, women were kept as sex slaves.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 12:04 PM
link   
a reply to: interupt42




Come on , everyone has a friend that has been arrested as a pedophile and continue to be friends with them. Am I. Right.


NOoooooooooo, what the heck kind of friends do you have?????



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 12:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: schuyler
He had sex with a completely grown-up beautiful 17 year old? So what?


If everything was on the up and up, why would Prince Andrew have to deny anything?



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 12:11 PM
link   
a reply to: JPtruther

First off what is the credibility of her claim???


Can she prove she lived with Epstein for that timeframe??


Or is it a situation where she claimed these things took place but has no proof she ever met Epstein???

If she a known associate who used to live at his residence, then obviously atleast she had access to Epstein..

Also , did Andrew frequent Epstein’s parties??


Was the girl living with Epstein when and if he did frequent parties??


I see a lot of these things where the accuser has no proof she has ever even met the accused.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheGreatWork
a reply to: JPtruther




How many more years must pass before the royal family and establishment are exposed completely...


They have been exposed completely for many years now. Lots of good books. Dope inc. is one to read.


All one has to do is to go back in history and look at the depravity of the royals. Incest, inbreeding, blood baths (literal and figurative), beastality, and every gluttonous gravely sinful act. Who knows what Andrew did or didn't do, but not much would surprise me.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 12:15 PM
link   
a reply to: kwakakev

Monica was consensual, he was cheating on his wife, but that is par for the course with presidents...

I definitely take an intern over apornstar that has been just totally worked over... ...


Juanita broadricks story is so laughable it is the reason I am anti-trump..


When he brought her to the presidential debate it caused me to look up her claim.. it is absolute nonsense... she has no proof she was ever alone with Clinton.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 12:27 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny

www.courthousenews.com...




The fact remains that Defendant recruited Ms. Giuffre while she was a minor child for sexual purposes and then proceeded to take her all over the world on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet, the “Lolita Express,” 2


This civil case was settled in Giuffre's favor



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 01:30 PM
link   
a reply to: JPtruther




The entire thing goes so deep and far, I really hope I see justice in my lifetime


Not gonna happen ever! I don't care if their caught red handed with
a baby's arm holding an apple. They will never see justice not even
a warning. Might as well figure it now cause it's never gonna change
and it's the same way in every country and gov. across the globe. All
you can do is try to protect you and yours from them. Take an example
from them and try to protect your people with as much diligence as they
protect theirs.

And know why they have theirs under maximum security. It's because
they know what the world is better than you and I. They will continue
always because we're stupid enough to think we need evidence. When
the truth is only massive blood shed will suffice. No one needs proof
for what they already know. Can't prove anything against people who
control justice. Are you mad?







 
24
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join