It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trumps Loans had Russian co-signers

page: 13
19
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 05:05 AM
link   
a reply to: mikescort

Still doesnt change the fact he did get loans from the bank.

The co signing thing wasnt my position really, it would have made my theory correct tho. Ut if you read two of my responses on pg 3 you'd see the theory has too many holes to be bullet proof.




posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 05:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: mikescort

Still doesnt change the fact he did get loans from the bank.

The co signing thing wasnt my position really, it would have made my theory correct tho. Ut if you read two of my responses on pg 3 you'd see the theory has too many holes to be bullet proof.


Really, wow... a business took loans? From a German bank???
Sound the alarm. You've nicely framed the bombshell.
How could this ever have been allowed to happen!



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 05:34 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Yes from a bank that has been proven to launder Russian dirty money.

You dont find it at all suspicious when hes in trouble he runs to two specific banks first?

I mean, I'm not sherlock Holmes, but if someone has been accused of mingling with the wrong crowd and has other ties to said wrong crowd it does raise some questions.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 05:46 AM
link   
a reply to: strongfp

I don't think anyone has flat out denied that he got loans from that bank or any others.

This thread is about Russian co-signers, which as far as evidence shows is made up BS.

I did read your responses, they only say that Deutsche bank has been found to be laundering in the past, there are is no evidence currently that Trump has anything to do with this then or now. Just speculation what ifs and guessing.

Paying more for a property may be a red flag but it is in no way proof.

As stated by others, if this were true the Mueller investigation or the IRS or the FBI or any other number of agencies which have been conducting investigations for the last 3yrs would have found this by now, It would not come from an anon unverified source, be touted as facts by a pretend journalist and then retracted 24hrs later.

This is BS, plain and simple. We have seen to many times now the MSM come out with some story from an anon source or someone close to, or someone spoke to someone who heard from their neighbours aunts dog that...... It is ridiculous, these stories should never be published if they are not verified.

If there is proof lets see it, until such time these people pretending to be journalists not verifying stories before releasing them needs to stop, it's damaging for society and for the US as a nation.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 05:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: UKTruth

Yes from a bank that has been proven to launder Russian dirty money.

You dont find it at all suspicious when hes in trouble he runs to two specific banks first?

I mean, I'm not sherlock Holmes, but if someone has been accused of mingling with the wrong crowd and has other ties to said wrong crowd it does raise some questions.


You're really cooking today... you've now uncovered that banks are willing to take Russian money! This is scandalous, Russians shouldn't be allowed to have money.

I'm with you, though, we should close down all banks that do business with suspected criminals.
Once we've done that, there'll be a big market for matresses with built in security features.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 06:10 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Russia money laundering is one of the reasons why eastern Europe looks worse then Afghanistan. Its a huge problem.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 06:30 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Yes clearly they were targeted.

Even tho the source everyone keeps linking clearly says they weren't the only groups to fall through the cracks and it clearly says they organized to take legal action, and forced a nagarive narrative. Again playing victim.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 07:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
O’Donnell has already walked it back himself though he won’t admit it was bs opinion but he did say that the story “wasn’t ready to report”.... hahaha even his apology was squirrelly but he had to do it.


Is he the guy on MSNBC who murdered his secretary, and hid the evidence?
i wouldn’t know since I haven’t watched that channel oh maybe since I do t know when. I actually saw his “apology” on OAN.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:25 AM
link   
Add this to the hundreds of other non-factual MSM lead stories they've ran about Trump since he won the primary. Why anyone would believe anything the MSM says at this point about Trump defies all logic and common sense.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: UKTruth

Russia money laundering is one of the reasons why eastern Europe looks worse then Afghanistan. Its a huge problem.


The argument is Trump was laundering money? And he conspired knowingly to launder money? Now, this is where you provide evidence that Trump actually broke a law. Or was Trump just another “victim” like a victim from a Ponzi Scheme? Your example is like saying a person buying a VW committed an environmental crime because they bought a Volkswagen? When it was VW that engaged in criminal activity, not the consumer.

edit on 30-8-2019 by neutronflux because: Added last sentence

edit on 30-8-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:31 AM
link   
a reply to: RexKramerPRT

Unfortunately the story was redacted by MSNBC and Lawrence O'Donnell made a statement of retraction on Wednesday.
His sources were not double checked. A process they would normallly have taken was skipped.

Now this does not mean that the story is not true. Just that MSNBC did not get double verification.
I do not know if the court documentation is available. I am sure the MSNBC is hot on that trail after this guffaw.
edit on 8302019 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:33 AM
link   


Now this does not mean that the story is not true. Just that MSNBC did not get double verification.

ahahahahaha
just because we can't verify it(like the pee dossier) doesn't mean its not true....
ahahahahaha
ahahahaaha
yeah and you cant verify the moon is not made of green cheese either
ahahahaha

you people are a laff riot



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

They never went after this information so we do not know what they would have done with the information.

These are current court cases to get information released by these organizations. So Mueller did not have access to any of this.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme
wow its friday


So Mueller did not have access to any of this.

oops i mean lie day



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: UKTruth

Russia money laundering is one of the reasons why eastern Europe looks worse then Afghanistan. Its a huge problem.


The argument is Trump was laundering money? And he conspired knowingly to launder money? Now, this is where you provide evidence that Trump actually broke a law. Or was Trump just another “victim” like a victim from a Ponzi Scheme? Your example is like saying a person buying a VW committed an environmental crime because they bought a Volkswagen? When it was VW that engaged in criminal activity, not the consumer.

Assuming that buying property is actually a legitimate money laundering method (I'm still waiting to hear how that's supposed to work), it does not follow that being "involved" would mean Trump has done anything wrong. If I buy your house from you, and then proceed to do something illegal there (let's say I open a meth lab in it), you haven't done anything wrong, even though you were "involved" in the incident. Similarly, even if the Russians were breaking some kind of law, and it involved condos purchased in one of Trump's properties, it does not follow that Trump has done anything wrong. The cops would need to prove that you sold me your house knowing I was going to open a meth lab there, and similarly you need to present evidence that Trump was a knowing participant in whatever illegal scheme we're theorizing here.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:38 AM
link   
the dude said the story was bs and he shouldn't have aired it
yet the thread lives on
lol
what a steaming pile of crap

it was a made up lie



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:39 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Who knows. The Clinton's got money from Russian sources. But when Deutsche bank was caught laundering money, I'm sure lots of people are either in on it, or became victim.

I mean, trump did sell his airline and some of his assets before going to foreign investors. Which shows she did try to resolve the bankruptcy on his own. The timing is just a little to coincidental that's all.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:43 AM
link   
a reply to: RexKramerPRT

There is no way that they will not have to eventually release these documents.
Deutsche Bank has been in trouble with the feds for money laundering in the past.
If they want to continue to do business within the US they will comply.
Right now there is an appeal being filed to hold this information back.

Deutsche Bank has not confirmed that they have any tax documentation from trump.



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:44 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

You people.

ha ha ha.

Such typical language shooter buddy



posted on Aug, 30 2019 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

#$%%^&&^^%




top topics



 
19
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join