Breaking: ALL 4 FISA Warrants Were Illegal IG rules!

Agree'd. If nothing comes of this we really are a banana republic. Putting this out there, without prosecution will have the exact opposite reaction from restoring faith in government.

a reply to: pianopraze

Nope.

Just more lies.

The FISA warrant was perfectly legal.

This story is a lie.

Funny how the news isn't reporting it.

a reply to: drewlander

Never. Nothing was illegal.
Sorry not sorry

a reply to: pianopraze
Lol Frustrated there hasnt been more arrests?

Dude there havent been any.

a reply to: CIAGypsy

yeah...remember when HRC had classified information on her private server which was accessed by a number of foreign hackers in clear and blatant flagrant violations of the law

No one remembers that.
Because it never happened.

a reply to: Grambler
What's with the russia hoax bs.???

That was real.

Jesus H. Christ.

You guys really do keep you heads in the sand.

a reply to: pianopraze

Where is the IG saying this?

oh right


He's not.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pianopraze

Nope.

Just more lies.

The FISA warrant was perfectly legal.

This story is a lie.

Funny how the news isn't reporting it.

It's already been reported. 3 months ago relating to the 2nd/3rd and 4th FISA warrant.
The new information is regarding the first one that got the ball rolling.
www.washingtonexaminer.com...

Perhaps wait for the IG report?

The FISA warrant was perfectly legal.

yeah legal things get ig scrutiny all the time
lol

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler
What's with the russia hoax bs.???

That was real.

Jesus H. Christ.

You guys really do keep you heads in the sand.

"The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election,"

whose head is where?
seems yours may be where the sun dont shine

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page could hinder a criminal case against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe if the Justice Department decides to bring charges against him. Federal prosecutors are close to making a final decision on whether to indict McCabe, who is accused of lying to federal agents, the New York Times reported Monday. McCabe’s lawyers met with Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, who will help make the call on whether to prosecute, and U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia Jessie Liu in two separate meetings last week. This signals McCabe’s lawyers could be making a last-ditch effort to convince the top law enforcement officials not to prosecute the case. 00:00 00:30 Subscribe to our expanded print magazine for more politics, deeper culture, better access Watch Full Screen to Skip Ads If they were to bring charges against McCabe, prosecutors would have to prove he knowingly and intentionally lied to investigators when he told them on two occasions that he did not remember authorizing Page to speak to a Wall Street Journal reporter. McCabe corrected himself at a later time.

few links on the topic but this says its not out tell late september or early october

www.realclearpolitics.com...

POSOBIEC: Recently news broke that the Department of Justice is currently weighing an indictment of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. McCabe, of course, was instrumental in authorizing and running the political espionage campaign against President Trump. And he also helped to give Hillary Clinton a legal pass on her unlawful classified e-mail server. McCabe was recommended for criminal referral by the inspector general of the DOJ Michael Horowitz. This we learned was for lying repeatedly to FBI investigators about the source of a leak inside his office to The Wall Street Journal, including lying under oath. At one point, McCabe even attempted to hold a conference call to berate his underlings for the leak getting out. This, of course, was all a sham. He knew exactly where the source of the leak had been because he himself was the source of the leak and knowingly and deliberately misled investigators. Now, McCabe's lawyers are meeting with the DOJ to urge them to drop the indictment. But as we learn more about the Department of Justice's deliberations on whether or not to file an indictment against McCabe a disturbing pattern has emerged. We've seen that the grand jury that was seated early on in the investigation has expired. One prosecutor, David Kent, assigned to the case has now been reassigned. And one Kamil Shields, a prosecutor, has left the Department of Justice altogether. Now, Washington D.C. U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu has punted, essentially, the decision to prosecute to main Justice and to Barr's deputy Jeffrey Rosen. This, of course, is the same Jessie Liu who was involved in the decision to prosecute fully the Awan brothers and involved in protecting the leaker James Wolfe to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

so a bit more back story but it does seem like we have to wait for the actual report to drop vs reported leaks

a reply to: pianopraze

I'll believe heads will roll when I see some tumbling by, seems like these people can get away with anything.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler
What's with the russia hoax bs.???

That was real.

Jesus H. Christ.

You guys really do keep you heads in the sand.

Hahahaha

Yep, who cares if mueller showed no conspiracy between any trump person and Russia on the election

You know better, right?

Go back to reading the pee dossier you out so much faith in

originally posted by: Stupidsecrets
How could it not be illegal. The info that started it was from a paid DNC attack in the dossier that was never verified. Drill down further and the secondary and tertiary info was dossier DNC info masked as independent info which it was not. It was the same info bouncing back on itself.

Go get the judges who authorized it and hear their take on it. From my knowledge they have all vanished and walked away. Go get them.

They used a circular reporting scheme to fabricate a veneer of legitimacy for the dossier. That is evidence of malicious intent.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
word on the street is they got comms from yates coordinating said circular reporting......on whose orders will be the straw that breaks the camels back
Anyone remember that Admiral Rogers guy......

Bombshell day!

So well see something happen after this news story!

Thank God the senate has ats for bombshells

Mar a Lago g7 baby. Boom!
.....

Look over there.. Another bombshell... Trumps banking dealings are almost made public! Let's a go pay taxes!

a reply to: pianopraze

Over three years trying to destroy our President, trying to destroy our Country and a man and his family based on lies...

Heads have to roll...A lot of them...

a reply to: CIAGypsy

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler
What's with the russia hoax bs.???

That was real.

Jesus H. Christ.

You guys really do keep you heads in the sand.

Which investigation found Russian collusion? Was it the house intelligence committee, the Senate intelligence, the FBI's or the Special counsel ?

Oh ya, it was none of them... Mean while, the FBI did state Hillary broke the law... Talk about head in the sand....

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pianopraze

Nope.

Just more lies.

The FISA warrant was perfectly legal.

This story is a lie.

Funny how the news isn't reporting it.

This is a textbook David Brock gas lighting technique.

You're glowing, dude. Glowing. Step it back a notch.