It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Elizabeth Warren Proposes Department of Economic Development to Regulate Economy

page: 2
18
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 10:31 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Useless Pocahantas Warren, that lied even about she is ( or isn't)....years of proven stupidity and incompetence...and now she wants to foist the known failed socialist model on the US....




posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 10:43 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

You do realize that the number of unemployed is way bigger than the unemployment rate. It is better than with Obama but still probably a minimum of double that number at all times. Trump did not fix the way they rate unemployment now to be accurate, fixing the deception would make his administration look worse, not many people actually know how the formula changed over the years.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 10:48 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


And I am Not " Down " with it ..........






posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 10:53 PM
link   
So a new government agency that gets to pick economic winners and losers funded on the taxpayer’s dime...provided they can continue to find or retain a job in a closed to competition market? Or it could all about sound business advice of how to increase profits by lowering overhead by outsourcing labor to lower economic countries. Which destabilizes domestic wages and employment but that is for another new department of assisted suicide for displaced workers.

Your taxes at work...
edit on 27-8-2019 by Ahabstar because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 10:55 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Well she lied about her heritage but we found out
Cause DNA don't lie

And people let me tell you now there ain't no doubt.
We're never get'n rid of her cause we can't even send her

Back to the Res er va tion.







posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 11:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: xuenchen

Well she lied about her heritage but we found out
Cause DNA don't lie

And people let me tell you now there ain't no doubt.
We're never get'n rid of her cause we can't even send her

Back to the Res er va tion.



Just to set the record straight...

The Cherokee have never wanted her... we've made jokes about her for over 30 years.

Disavowed her more than once.

So no Rez for her regardless.




posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 11:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Ah gawd damn it. Look hombre I meant no offense what so ever
in any way. I hope you found my idea of art humorous as it was only
intended.

Bury's head in pillow and pretends to be asleep.

edit on 27-8-2019 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 04:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Lumenari

Ah gawd damn it. Look hombre I meant no offense what so ever
in any way. I hope you found my idea of art humorous as it was only
intended.

Bury's head in pillow and pretends to be asleep.


It's all good!




posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 06:37 AM
link   
a reply to: liejunkie01

You realize that more than 10% of the American public is middle class though, right?

So you cannot correlate union membership with being middle class.

And there is a reason why union membership is dropping in the private sector -- because they are job killers. The only place where unions can be sustained is in the public sector where they can pretend to ignore economic reality thanks to taxes.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 06:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

The Price controls on medications advocated by Elizabeth Warren, will be needed when the avalanche of pharmaceutical industry judgements begins in earnest.

Johnson and Johnson is already planning to raise prices on its drugs, to compensate for yesterday's $576 million judgement against the corporation. Their stock was up big today.


Awesome idea! Let's force them to pay out, and then block them from finding a way to financially compensate.

And then when they go out of business and we have no medications ... Oh, well ... Who needed those drugs anyhow, amirite?



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 08:23 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Let’s tax millionaires into oblivion, not celebrities nor politicians but specifically millionaires that create jobs. Put THEM in the poorhouse for a change and see what happens.

Two years later, we need to raise taxes to keep funding everything like unemployment from jobs lost when proprietors shutdown their businesses.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 08:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Ahabstar

Well that's why the government needs to create jobs for everyone ...

I've heard about countries where that happens like the USSR used to be.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 08:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: ketsuko

Let’s tax millionaires into oblivion, not celebrities nor politicians but specifically millionaires that create jobs. Put THEM in the poorhouse for a change and see what happens.

Two years later, we need to raise taxes to keep funding everything like unemployment from jobs lost when proprietors shutdown their businesses.


I have to credit The Redneck for this, he really opened my eyes to the object hypocrisy.

They scream about tariffs (taxes) and how they're a burden on the middle class, yet endorse a raise in taxes!

How are people not seeing this!



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 08:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: contextual
I can see only frothing, uneducated types are replying having not looked into it further.
Here is an actual presentation.
For the tl;dr read crowd
Rather than foreign banks loaning money to new businesses why not have a Government pot to borrow from and pay back, to America.

I know there's not much of a combined IQ here but, hint:government allowing private business to exist isn't Communism.
Get educated folks! As always hannity gets it wrong.

Now do some learning about China, the ruling party may still use the name Communist but they could be called anything, it's pretty far from even Socialist nowadays. Authoritarian yes but they ain't alone there.

they have 1/1024th of an education......
its proportional



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 08:54 AM
link   
a reply to: sooth




posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: liejunkie01

Here in modern America the labor unions are just front groups for democrat political organizing and fundraising. In fact people have been able to free themselves from some public labor unions because they were able to prove that some or most of their union dues went to Democrat political causes and that it was essentially a violation of their free speech to force them to support a political organization in order to work a government job. When I was a union worker it was a closed shop so you had no choice but to financially support democrats.
Here in America if you want to live and thrive a little and not rely on corporate scraps and you are a little smart you can negotiate a much better arrangement for yourself than you ever could hoping for someone to collectively bargain for one on your behalf. If you are a supermarket cart pusher you can choose to throw in with the union and strike for better wages and benefits or you know, get a better job and forget all about the other supermarket cart pushers.

The people in that particular photo are all labor union members, there are still enough of them to make it look like a crowd.

edit on 28-8-2019 by funbobby because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 01:00 PM
link   
Well now, I wonder whether she wants to go down the facist route of control over the private sector via regulation or the full on communist route of state ownership of the means of production.
She'll need to be a bit clearer on which type of dictator she is.

edit on 28/8/2019 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 01:30 PM
link   
I think Tucker Carlson thought this idea was genius. I tend to agree with him on a lot of things so I need to look into this in more detail.

However, off the top of my head I would say; Don't we already have laws in place to regulate large corporations? Laws that we don't enforce?

Also, what ever happened to reinstating Glass-Steagall? Why no support for that? I support it.

What about repealing Bill Clinton's Telecommunications Act, which brought about the crap news and radio we currently have to suffer with?

I hate Warren with a passion and for anyone to say she has any integrity is the biggest joke I've heard but I also believe that some of these corporations need regulating.

Some scream "Socialist" whenever anyone mentions reigning in any corporations but remember that 2008 Wall Street disaster? Who bailed the banksters out? The American tax payer, that is who.....So, we have Socialism already. Socialism for "too big to fail" criminals and tough luck for the average tax payer.
edit on 28-8-2019 by toolgal462 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 08:15 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

The same way no could see the inherent contradiction in lumping together one group of people who identify solely based on the idea that they can only and ever be happy in sexual relationships with of the same biological sex and people who claim they are trapped in bodies of the wrong biological sex and really identify as the opposite gender ought to be normal and natural allies and there is no inherent contradiction or conflict there at all.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 08:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
Well now, I wonder whether she wants to go down the facist route of control over the private sector via regulation or the full on communist route of state ownership of the means of production.
She'll need to be a bit clearer on which type of dictator she is.


Yeah, she'll be clear ... as mud. If she actually told anyone, then no one in their sane mind would actually vote for her.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join