It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Answers to political problems that are a little too convenient..

page: 3
3
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: funbobby
a reply to: olaru12

You get it twisted at your own risk, it's only ok to grab women's genitals when "they let you do it" and "they let you do it" more often/easily when you are rich and famous. And then it is just fine, they like it.


You are the perfect new Poster Boy for the NEW ATS.

A star for you...
edit on 27-8-2019 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

thanks, one for you too! was the old ATS full of the "No pussy grabbing president!" crowd?



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 04:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: funbobby
a reply to: olaru12

thanks, one for you too! was the old ATS full of the "No pussy grabbing president!" crowd?


As I recall....There weren't near as many trolls insulting the other members. Times change...



edit on 27-8-2019 by olaru12 because: check it brenda



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 05:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Fools

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Fools


We had that exact thing in the past.
Before feminism.
Prayer in school.
Abortion was illegal.
Men supported their wives.

Things have changed.
Better or worse is subjective.



Yes, they have, now the powers that be tell us that moral actions are all decided by your genitals and where they feel the moistest at any given moment. They also tell us that words are louder than action. Upside down clown world.


From what I understand it's ok to grab women's genitals if you are rich and famous. Clown world indeed!!



One persons shower talk is another persons love of child porn??

Look, # is what it is, either you punish actual criminal behavior or you advocate it. In your example, you are saying that a person saying something criminal is the same as a crime, but at the same time you find no issue with an actual crime that happened physically. As in, a pussy was actually grabbed without its consent. See, that is ok right? Why do you play these semantics? Are you covering for someone or do you hope to have the power some day to actually lay with a 12 year old and say, "well he/she said she was ok with it!"

I really dont get your argument and given the chance, I would love to see you explain your thoughts in an actual court of law.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: thedigirati

Whatever... doesn’t change the fact your hero went that route...

For me personally that just ruins immersion..

Way harder to pretend it is you with an actor of a different race.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: Fools

So you really don’t think the generations that came before this one were worse?!?! Lol

We just hear every crazy story now..



Do you think pedophiles were molesting LESS children before protective services?!!?



Hell 150 years ago was slavery and EVERY single attractive female would have been raped regularly.... and not just black slavery... for all of human history before then..



Sadly, you are correct.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: funbobby

You can’t know if they will like it when you are doing it to a stranger without asking...


I bet trump is right... most women in his circles will let him do whatever because of his money..but he cannot know that before he has asked..



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Fools

Moral relativism.

You decide what is moral for you personally, but agree that it may not be moral for someone else and agree not to ever judge them for that. Which, when you think about it, really means nothing is beyond the bounds of morality because it will always end up being moral for someone, somewhere, and you are not to judge it which means tacitly, you think it's moral too.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 06:01 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Did someone insult you?



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 06:06 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny

"he cannot know that before he has asked.. "

you don't know if someone is into you without formally asking? Perhaps he should get something in writing?



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny


I bet trump is right... most women in his circles will let him do whatever because of his money..but he cannot know that before he has asked..

...which means that he had to have asked before doing anything, because his statement was that they let him.

So, why are we even still talking about this? Two scoops, anyone?

TheRedneck



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: funbobby
a reply to: JustJohnny

Banning things simply doesn't work, so any proposals to ban things are illogical.


Right, like abortions.



posted on Aug, 28 2019 @ 12:05 PM
link   
a reply to: usernameconspiracy

Indeed, in fact isn't that the crux of the argument against banning them and in fact why they are not banned?

The argument is that people would do it anyways and that would in fact lead to much more harm right?

And then these same people call for guns and/or drugs to be banned?







 
3
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join