It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Answers to political problems that are a little too convenient..

page: 2
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12


From what I understand it's ok to grab women's genitals if you are rich and famous.

You understand wrong. It's OK if they let you. A little thing called "consent." It's an interesting concept; maybe you should read up on it.

It is just a fact that having a lot of wealth and fame means some women will consent quite easily. We used to call them "gold-diggers."

TheRedneck




posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

You can’t have consent, if you have not asked.. obviously..


And he specially said he does not ask..


“He is so rich and famous, he doesn’t even have to ask.. “ was his whole point.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 12:42 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

Wait a minute!
Are you saying all those playmates weren't sleeping with Hugh Hefner because he was a smooth talker? They were actually trying to reach a goal?

Huh, I've been living a lie....



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 12:44 PM
link   
a reply to: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk

That is crazy...


Is it cheaper to buy an 8 year veteran plumber than a 4 year one?!?

No.. you always pay more for experience.. if they are corrupt, then they are just better at being corrupt and this command an even higher price..


Now the earlier point about once you have them bought off, you have dirt on them is a very fair point..



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny

I'm sure you already know that a politicians number one priority is to get reelected.
And I can guarantee that many of them don't see the favors as bribes.
Tell yourself a lie long enough and it becomes the truth.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Bluntone22

For sure...

Which is why it is VERY obvious trump paid Daniels for sex...

She wasn’t after a job, he called her up specifically, and obviously no one is banging an out of shape 70 year old for sexual attraction... lol



I can’t believe he chose such a nasty pornstar...


There are ones that do not do all the humiliation and interracial type stuff..



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny

I don't know if trump gave Daniels money.
If I had to gamble I would say it had more to do with exchanging favors.
He was well connected in tv production so who really knows what she wanted.

But I do agree. Why would he tag that old bag?



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny


You can’t have consent, if you have not asked.. obviously..

You can't?

Sorry, Johnny, I have had women want me before I asked them. Some of them came right out and said it. They consented before I asked them to. Of course, that was when I was a strapping young redneck, not the old decrepit redneck I am today.

You and Olaru should really get out more. There are fun things to do outside the computer screen.

TheRedneck



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: Bluntone22


There are ones that do not do all the humiliation and interracial type stuff..


Um... this sounds racist to me.

Stormy never had Sex with President Trump, she admitted to lying.

Avenatti put her up to it.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Bluntone22

That's why I think the Daniels thing was just an extortion attempt. She probably met him at a mixer, exchanged numbers maybe, and then when he started into politics decided to pull a quick scam for a nice easy payoff. I mean, really, the dude is married to MELANIA! Who cheats on her for Stormy Daniels?

If he wanted to cheat, he could have almost any female celebrity out there. That's what I think has everyone upset... most people can't say that. I know I can't.

TheRedneck



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny

Go back and read what I posted again: CHEAPER for rookie or first term, EASIER for 8 year or long term.
The rest must be from somebody else's reply.

What good is replying if you're not even going to read rather than just scanning?



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 01:28 PM
link   
a reply to: funbobby
It does not work because you need to find the correct thing to ban.
Hey just a quick idea and I think it is the solution: What if we ban school shootings?

If it is forbidden to do them, those who seek out to do them, will know, "okay, it is forbidden, cannot do that"




posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 02:10 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny

we ban nukes? I don't know that, can you cite a specific regulation?
We ban C4 and "military grade vehicles" like Humvees?
If you had enough money for tanks and military jets and things then you could buy them legally, you might need a permit for some classes of explosives, other explosives require no permits.


You think that explosives are not legal and that is why there are not many bombings in the US but in fact they are quite legal and there are not many bombings in the US because there are not many people who want to commit them, did you think it was because of some restriction or regulation?



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: UpIsNowDown

we keep kids in high school until 18(sometimes older), most of the shooters are 17 and 18, perhaps you are on to something! Let's ban 17 and 18 year olds from the public schools, that will cut down on school shootings significantly!

In fact in America some schools are gun free zones and other schools are chock full of guns, armed staff, we never have any large massacres in the ones chock full of guns for some reason, what could it be?

I am not aware of any state in the US that allows a 16 year old to conceal carry.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 02:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Oleandra88

I think we could ban gun free zone laws, that's something the government does have power over, what laws it passes, it can't really control people's behavior.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 02:27 PM
link   
a reply to: funbobby

That idea clicked instantly with me



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 03:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: funbobby
a reply to: Oleandra88

I think we could ban gun free zone laws, that's something the government does have power over, what laws it passes, it can't really control people's behavior.



So what is your point???

Laws are useless because people will not follow them anyway?!?!


I AM NOT SAYING BAN GUNS...


Just pointing out the flaw in the logic



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny



So what is your point???

He was probably joking, see my message he was replying to.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

You get it twisted at your own risk, it's only ok to grab women's genitals when "they let you do it" and "they let you do it" more often/easily when you are rich and famous. And then it is just fine, they like it.



posted on Aug, 27 2019 @ 03:40 PM
link   
removed because no one will get what I am trying to say, and before it gets ugly..
edit on 27-8-2019 by Oleandra88 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join