It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: SaddledMummy
a reply to: AnakinWayneII
Much better design is as like spiderlings use. So, they crab a fly, injecting enzymes into it, so the fly is their bag of Gucci top colon design - portable and removable intestines.
So, why don't mammals use that better version of ... design?
Are you saying our digestive system does not use enzymes to do it's job?
The food you eat has the smarts to already contain the enzymes needed in order to digest.
Are you saying that the human digestive system does not have it's own enzymes that break food down?
originally posted by: Plotus
I would then take it up with God and point out His mistake..
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Nothin
YES; its called 'intellegent design'. This does not require a created belief system (by others in order to control/manipulate) to understand. Our creater is smarter than the average bear.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
Is this just more further evidence of poor [intelligent] design/no [intelligent] design?
What do to think?
It's clearly a digestive system which works. Not just in humans but across the animal kingdom.
To be honest, the OP is a case study in silliness. It looks messy, so it's wrong! How ridiculous can you get? That's what I think.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Well, working in Healthcare for more than 25 years, I could relate inummerable wonders of a properly operating GI.
Your question and response is based on supposition, not really any kind of proposal.
Do you suppose we should have a straight, course tube? Than I would suggest you could start a thread in regards why you cant be a large cat😉
...
AWAKE!: HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THOSE WHO POINT TO FEATURES OF PLANTS OR ANIMALS THAT THEY CLAIM ARE POORLY DESIGNED?
PROFESSOR BEHE: Just because we don’t know the reason for some feature in an organism does not mean that it doesn’t have an important role to play. For example, so-called vestigial organs were once thought to show that the human body and other organisms were poorly designed. The appendix and the tonsils, for instance, were once thought to be vestigial organs and were routinely removed. But then it was discovered that these organs play a role in the immune system, and they are no longer considered vestigial.
Another point to remember is that in biology certain things apparently do occur by chance. But just because my car has a dent in it or gets a flat tire does not mean that the car or the tire was not designed. Likewise, the fact that some things occur by chance in biology does not mean that the sophisticated, complex molecular machinery of life arose by chance. That argument is simply not logical.
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Nothin
YES; its called 'intellegent design'. This does not require a created belief system (by others in order to control/manipulate) to understand. Our creater is smarter than the average bear.
Perhaps you would consider putting a caveat in your posts, to let folks know that you are only expressing beliefs, opinions, supposition, and conjecture: and not any kind of truth, nor reality ? By your logic: should not humans be eating everything that contains digestive enzymes ?
'Cause the creator put them there for us, no ?