It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

JUST IN: Trump defunds Planned Parenthood

page: 6
68
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

Gotta remember... These are the same people who think we're the monsters because we want to protect the lives of innocent children but at the same time, support the death penalty for capital murderers and rapists, which they're against.




posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:31 PM
link   
a reply to: LSU2018

Babies dont vote...



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254
So there are no Doctor offices or hospitals or clinics or pharmacies in rural areas with people on Medicaid? Only Planned Parenthood offices next to 7-11's?

Please.

Maybe the local Shamen can help them.

You make it sound as if PP is doing God's work, helping the poor.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

In the grand scheme of things it's the rural areas that will be most impacted. In an urban environment a person could still receive service, albeit lower quality, from a free clinic or a nearby hospital. Which will actually end up costing taxpayers more than if they went to PP.

For a person in a rural environment, PP might be the only option for 50 miles.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: LSU2018

And nothing we do can change the way the left think’s of us.

Babies are innocent murderers aren’t .

The left’s main emotion is hate that’s why we should feed them with a long handle spoon .


edit on 19-8-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-8-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Can you back this up?

If what your saying is true here then trump just messed up big time.

Thousands of women trump supporters that use pp are going to expect their level of care to continue and the amount of abortions done to lower.
But if this is true it will be their care that takes the hit.

The abortions having always been funded by the private sector will continue while the prenatal care that was funded through medicaid will now be cut off.---That's what you are saying?


edit on 19-8-2019 by scraedtosleep because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:36 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

If you like your doctor , you can keep your doctor.

That was a promise kept in my case.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12
Trump single handedly just encouraged young women to vote. Roe v. Wade has always been a loosing proposition for the GOP.

www.usatoday.com...


As if this move:

1. stops PP from providing abortions
2. is the only abortion provider in the country
3. makes abortions completely inaccessible

What it does is prevent PP from using taxpayers funds for abortions which they do no matter what whitewash they put on it.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:37 PM
link   
a reply to: pavil

It could very easily be the only office that specializes in reproductive health.

Do you really think women want a GP that's untrained in gynaecology probing around their nethers on a regular basis?



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Did you seriously just type that?

Planned Parenthood is a mainly urban provider.



Just did an elementary search on Planned Parenthood locations. I'm just not seeing red dots in the sticks there. All of them are in urban locations.

I do feel sorry for those poor, poor women in the Dakotas though. They are just going to be missing all that free health care.
edit on 19-8-2019 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Wardaddy454

In the grand scheme of things it's the rural areas that will be most impacted. In an urban environment a person could still receive service, albeit lower quality, from a free clinic or a nearby hospital. Which will actually end up costing taxpayers more than if they went to PP.

For a person in a rural environment, PP might be the only option for 50 miles.


Really?

Link



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: pavil

It could very easily be the only office that specializes in reproductive health.

Do you really think women want a GP that's untrained in gynaecology probing around their nethers on a regular basis?


May I ask what part of this move is preventing PP from performing abortions? Seriously?
Can they still perform abortions after this is enacted?
Last I heard form many on the left, the percentage of taxpayer $$$ was very low so stopping it would be an act of futility. Now, it is a the make or break for the entire PP company?

How does that work?

Unless, you are using poor people and those in need of a free abortion as your own political playing cards?



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:42 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Prove that they use federal funds for abortions.

That is something that is specifically not covered by Medicare or Medicaid. Medicare/-aid is something that is taken very seriously. The audits CMS does are extremely thorough and even the smallest infraction is treated harshly.

So please provide evidence that every PP facility that provides abortions has been able to slip under the radar of CMS audits on a consistent basis.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Once again Trump panders to his ignorant base instead of bashing decisions off of facts.

Can't wait for the number of new AIDS cases to explode just like what happened in Indiana when Pence defunded PP.


That aids outbreak was caused by Democrat drug operations to make Pence look bad.

They didn't even care about the victims they created.

It was a political attack 🥥



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:44 PM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

That's what I'm saying. Federal funding doesn't go to abortions. It covers routine care. All this accomplishes is deny poor people access to that care. Abortions will still be offered for an out of pocket cost, just like always.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
Good. You want abortions and birth control? Buy it yourself instead of making your neighbor pay for it.


The stupid will breed the rest of us to death if we don't pay for their abortions and birth control.

That's the honest truth.

The republicans are making over population worse.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

They receive federal funding. They use it to fund services, and the money they don't use for those services is freed to provide abortions. Half a dozen of one, six of the other.

If they want their federal money back, separate the two branches. Have one that is solely for abortion and does not receive federal funds and the other one that provides their other "services" and can receive the federal money.

After all, a little bird told me that the fetal body part market is quite lucrative. I'm sure the abortion half will do just fine without my tax dollars.
edit on 19-8-2019 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Because Republicans force poor women to have sex without birth control?

You can verify that Republicans are strapping them down and allowing them to be raped until pregnant?

If not, then no one except those women's poor choices is forcing them to become pregnant and making overpopulation worse.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

Nothing about this move is preventing PP from performing abortions. Abortions aren't covered by federal funding.

What it differs prevent is people who have federal insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, or even Tricare (and people say Trump loves the troops) from receiving basic medical care at PP as their insurance will no longer be accepted.



posted on Aug, 19 2019 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: scraedtosleep

That's what I'm saying. Federal funding doesn't go to abortions. It covers routine care. All this accomplishes is deny poor people access to that care. Abortions will still be offered for an out of pocket cost, just like always.


So your argument should be put to PP. It's they who have refused funding because they don't want to play by the rules... i.e. they want to continue to encourage women to have abortions. No one has taken their funding away.
edit on 19/8/2019 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
68
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join