It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Clinton for President In 2020?

page: 1
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:23 AM
link   
Well Steve Bannon says consider it Democrats. Seems like Biden is being taken down along with many others. Bernie? Nah. So getting back to Steve, and yes he does look that he was on a beverage binge but hes still is Steve and he does grab a headline now and then. So lets look at the Mrs Clinton possibility. Forget about the age thing as the youngsters will vote for her. Plus she does have stones of iron. Anyone see the picture of her and Bill the day after Epstein's death. Both looked refreshed, revitalized and full of zest! Several years or months ago it appeared that Hillary was sick. It could have simply been the flu, walking pneumonia or she had a Heart Valve issue requiring surgery. I mean they will never tell you but it looks like she has gas back in the tank. Also it seems that word has got out to the "Majestic Four" or "The Squad" or whatever they refer to themselves these days. Was it all because of Nancy that they have somewhat toned it down. Nah, not in my opine as these four only cower to absolute power. Seems like they know somethings up. I wonder if Vegas has a public line on her will she or wont she.

Plus shes a "young" 71 as compared to the rest of the crowd!


Hillary Clinton, 71 Former secretary of state; former senator from New York; former first lady; 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Democrat “I’m not running. But I'm going to keep on working and speaking and standing up for what I believe.”



So here's the link:

Real Clear Polictis Steve Bannon


edit on 17-8-2019 by Waterglass because: added




posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:28 AM
link   
Ah....she's 71......old battle axe, am I right....?

I think I want her, now....!



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:34 AM
link   
Steve Bannon approaches these subject with the "taking on china" mindset and sees that none in the Democrat field are capable of not only taking on Trump, but relatively weak on china.

Steve understands one thing, this is a do or die agenda in regards to china and Trump is leading that charge, it'll be the defining legacy of his Presidency, in my personal opinion.

So with the current crop no good, he feels that Democrats might want to try and throw a celebrity into the mix that has a large base of appeal, but lets be real, Hillary is destined to continue to lose as her prior connections are being rooted out, replaced and dismissed.
Michelle said she wasn't even thinking about running, so she is ruled out and Bloomberg? Well, who knows but he is right, there is still time for more candidates to jump in.

Trumps 2020 Presidency hinges on THREE(3) things, The state of the economy, china and gun legislation. These are my personal opinions.
edit on 17-8-2019 by Arnie123 because: Speel chekc



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:37 AM
link   
No, just NO


+10 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

Do it!!!!!! I would love to see her get rejected for the 3rd time .



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
Trumps 2020 Presidency hinges on THREE(3) things, The state of the economy, china and gun legislation. These are my personal opinions.

Don't forget the state of the Democrat party. After all it's them and the bad policies of the previous administration that allowed Trump to win.

If they can't come up with a solid platform other than "Orange man bad" and "Free **** for everyone" they will essentially be handing him his second term. Regardless of the economy or gun legislation or any other factor.



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:42 AM
link   
a reply to: interupt42
Yes! Can we please have a news crew in the room when she loses this time so we can see her lose her freaking mind again. I would have paid good money to be sitting next to her when she realized she had officially lost to Trump the first time.

edit on 17-8-2019 by MRinder because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass




Well Steve Bannon says consider it Democrats.

Yeah , he would wouldn't he.

A Fox News poll released Thursday showed President Trump losing head-to-head matchups against four of the top Democratic presidential primary contenders.
thehill.com...


How easy it would be to fight the old enemy.



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Waterglass
Anyone see the picture of her and Bill the day after Epstein's death. Both looked refreshed, revitalized and full of zest!

Could've been the newborn twins with hot sauce they ate that morning.




posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:50 AM
link   
a reply to: gortex

It's also easy to lose when you haven't even begun the fight too.

With the proposals they're making, you could confiscate 100% of the earnings of both corporations *and* everyone making more than $200,000/year and still not have enough to pay for even half of the chickens the democrats are throwing at everyone's pot -- Green New Deal, *free* health care (aka Medicare for all), *free* college, etc.

The reality is that you would have to jack up taxes as much as 10 times on the middle class to even begin to think about paying for it ... in addition to measures like confiscatory policy on "the rich" and corporations, and you'd end up destroying the economy and drastically shrinking your tax base in the process.

That alone ought to ruin any democrat's chances.



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

I hope she does run! I'd like to see more of this...

and this...



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: JAY1980

originally posted by: Arnie123
Trumps 2020 Presidency hinges on THREE(3) things, The state of the economy, china and gun legislation. These are my personal opinions.

Don't forget the state of the Democrat party. After all it's them and the bad policies of the previous administration that allowed Trump to win.

If they can't come up with a solid platform other than "Orange man bad" and "Free **** for everyone" they will essentially be handing him his second term. Regardless of the economy or gun legislation or any other factor.
Agreed.



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 09:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Waterglass




Well Steve Bannon says consider it Democrats.

Yeah , he would wouldn't he.

A Fox News poll released Thursday showed President Trump losing head-to-head matchups against four of the top Democratic presidential primary contenders.
thehill.com...


How easy it would be to fight the old enemy.



Ummm...I know...right...?

Kinda like when Hillary was polling at 98% and President Trump at 2%...

But we all know what happened there...right...?

Gotta love them polls...I just can't figure who in their right mind would have any faith in polling...

Ahhhhh...that's right...you inhabit your left mind...








YouSir



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 10:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Waterglass




Well Steve Bannon says consider it Democrats.

Yeah , he would wouldn't he.

A Fox News poll released Thursday showed President Trump losing head-to-head matchups against four of the top Democratic presidential primary contenders.
thehill.com...


How easy it would be to fight the old enemy.
You never learn, huh?

***The Fox News poll was taken between Aug. 11-13 and contacted 1,013 registered voters on landlines and cellphones. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percent for all registered voters, and 4.5 percent for Democratic primary voters.

A whole 1,013 huh? Yeah, this isn't indicative of anything considering that small sample size.



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 10:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

You know what? I doesn't make sense at all that Democrats gave us such a bunch of bad candidates. I think socialists/far left want actually to let Trump win reelection in order to finish destroying the democrat party and emerge like a new 100% socialist party. Win the elections never was the agenda. I also think Pelosi believes that too, she figured out too late.

And you know what?...It's working.



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

The only poll that matters takes place next year everything else is just an indication , pollsters generally use samples of around 1000 but I'm sure if the poll put Trump beating the 4 Dems your attitude to it would be different.



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Bone75

Read my other post on the Chief pilot for Epstein for almost 30 years. Many of the flights were over the ocean to an non described locations. Hmm. So jettison the cargo into the sea for Shark food?

Link
edit on 17-8-2019 by Waterglass because: added



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 10:55 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

You read my mind



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 10:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: Waterglass

Do it!!!!!! I would love to see her get rejected for the 3rd time .



Now that is just sadistic. Masochistic as well. If we hold that the strength of our Republic is to bring forth the best we can assemble to govern then to knowingly root for the worst to be brought forth just for the spectacle of a third sound drubbing, in actuality we are rooting for our own collective pain and suffering. And that is masochistic.



posted on Aug, 17 2019 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: gortex

It's also easy to lose when you haven't even begun the fight too.

With the proposals they're making, you could confiscate 100% of the earnings of both corporations *and* everyone making more than $200,000/year and still not have enough to pay for even half of the chickens the democrats are throwing at everyone's pot -- Green New Deal, *free* health care (aka Medicare for all), *free* college, etc.

The reality is that you would have to jack up taxes as much as 10 times on the middle class to even begin to think about paying for it ... in addition to measures like confiscatory policy on "the rich" and corporations, and you'd end up destroying the economy and drastically shrinking your tax base in the process.

That alone ought to ruin any democrat's chances.


If I'm gonna be taxed that much, what is my incentive to remain in the middle class? I might as well join the lower class.

Multiply that sentiment by millions.
edit on 17-8-2019 by Wardaddy454 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join