It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: MrRCflying
I think what the kid did was horribly stupid, and if he gets punished (as long as it's not heinous), this shouldn't be the hill to die on for pro gun rights people.
What the kid did was irresponsible given recent events, and just brings negative attention on the issue. I'd be willing to bet many people would have had the same reaction as the former firefighter, though I've already stated I think he could have handled things differently to insulate himself.
originally posted by: Identified
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I hope that's all they are doing. He should stay quiet, don't show his video, assuming he wasn't live streaming, and let the open carry law speak for him.
Looks like it will be an uphill fight to make the charges stick if he did not make any verbal or physical threats.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: MrRCflying
Looks like it will be an uphill fight to make the charges stick if he did not make any verbal or physical threats.
Going off of the facts we know, I'd agree.
The government really needs to be able to prove without a shadow of doubt that terrorism is the intent of the accused. They've really been throwing that term recklessly lately.... In fact, I even commented in the thread suggesting that Trump might label ANTIFA a terrorist organization that this could be the next course in the tit for tat, gun owners.
3. No offense is committed under this section by a person acting in good faith with the purpose to prevent harm.
"It's official. I hate Walmart. Apparently they won't sell Rifle and shotgun ammo if your under 21," the alleged post said. "'New policy' However I can walk into the store with a loaded .40 and nobody says anything. What a joke."
originally posted by: Identified
a reply to: MrRCflying
Ha looks like one of those ambiguous knee-jerk laws they can Willy nilly be applied whenever they feel like it.
Also looks like the same law can be used as a defense for him or even the former FF.
3. No offense is committed under this section by a person acting in good faith with the purpose to prevent harm.
If someone feels fear just seeing a gun, does that trump the rights of the person carrying the gun in a lawful manner? Common sense says no, but recent history has shown that, in the US at least, emotions trump common sense.
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: MrRCflying
They will try to use his dress and fire arm as the communication method. Not saying it is proper.
originally posted by: PraetorianAZ
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: MrRCflying
They will try to use his dress and fire arm as the communication method. Not saying it is proper.
That how undercover cops dress.
In a separate interview with Andreychenko's wife, Angelice, she told investigators Andreychenko had told her of his plan to walk into Walmart with a gun, and that she told him it was not a smart idea; that people would take him seriously due to recent mass shootings.
She told investigators that Andreychenko said he wanted to see if Walmart would respect his second amendment rights. Angelice referred to Andreychenko's actions as those of an immature boy.
Anastasia Andreychenko, the suspect’s sister, said she received a call from him just after 3 p.m. on Thursday. Andreychenko asked her if she would videotape him going into the Walmart with a gun, and that he referred to the action as a social experiment on how his second amendment right would be respected in a public area. Anastasia told him it was a bad idea, and that she did not want to help him take video.
Link
originally posted by: roadgravel
In a separate interview with Andreychenko's wife, Angelice, she told investigators Andreychenko had told her of his plan to walk into Walmart with a gun, and that she told him it was not a smart idea; that people would take him seriously due to recent mass shootings.
She told investigators that Andreychenko said he wanted to see if Walmart would respect his second amendment rights. Angelice referred to Andreychenko's actions as those of an immature boy.
Anastasia Andreychenko, the suspect’s sister, said she received a call from him just after 3 p.m. on Thursday. Andreychenko asked her if she would videotape him going into the Walmart with a gun, and that he referred to the action as a social experiment on how his second amendment right would be respected in a public area. Anastasia told him it was a bad idea, and that she did not want to help him take video.
Link
Angelice referred to Andreychenko's actions as those of an immature boy.
So that's what they call it now, immature.