UFO's, Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake and the Ridgecrest Earthquakes.

Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake is a large military installation that support the research, testing and evaluation programs of the U.S. Navy. One of the U.S patented projects is Patent number US 10,144,532 B2. This involves a “craft using an inertial mass reduction device comprising: an inner resonant cavity wall; an outer resonant cavity wall, the inner resonant cavity wall and the outer resonant cavity wall forming a resonant cavity; and, microwave emitters such that the microwave emitters create high frequency electromagnetic waves throughout the resonant cavity causing the outer resonant cavity wall to vibrate in an accelerated mode and create a local polarized vacuum outside the outer resonant cavity wall. “patentsgazette.uspto.gov...
Here are the U.S. Navy diagrams that I found here. www.thedrive.com...

The type of craft that are in question, we have witness’s accounts of:

The Triangular craft of Rendlesham Forest. The diamond craft of The Cash/Landrum Incident in Texas,

And the Tic Tac.

If these indeed are our craft, being reverse engineered and built at NAWS China Lake,
then what could have possibly that caused a 7.1 earth quake?
Did an experiment get out of hand? Here is a diagram of a Dipole Field Generator.

I don’t know what would happen it were mounted on a fixed platform, and platform was then spun in a clock-wise rotation, or even tilted on its axis and rotated.
Now, we have this document. Extremely interesting it is, but look at paragraph 5!

Did the Chinese or other foreign power's infiltrate NAWS China Lake and cause a problem?
I’m sure the geology experts will tell you that the compressions waves, that began around 07/05/2019 at 11:07 (5.4 EQ at 7 km deep), 07/06/2019 at 03:19 (7.0 EQ at 8 km deep), 07/12/2019 at 13:11 (4.9 at 9.9 km deep) and the 1000 more EQ’s, are all normal.
Here are normal seismogram examples from geology.isu.edu... and www.geo.mtu.edu...


Here is U S Berkley's detection of what they say is a nuclear bomb going off in North Korea. seismo.berkeley.edu...


And here is the UNAVCO seismogram of Ridgecrest CA 07/06/2019 at 03:19 (7.0 EQ at 8 km deep), www.unavco.org...
They look very similar, yes?
I don't know if reversed UFO technology or a new project got out of hand, or even if a new DUMB is being built to house a new craft.
But something strange happened at NAWS China Lake/Ridgecrest, and those temblors continue to be felt today.

a reply to: Violater1

Interesting that the seismograph image was apparently set to leave some data off. This image was taken from the Humboldt State University seismograph. The beginning of the quake is on the bottom of the image.





Start at about 42 seconds in the video. You can see the P Waves start building, as in an earthquake.

a reply to: Violater1

And here is the UNAVCO seismogram of Ridgecrest CA 07/06/2019 at 03:19 (7.0 EQ at 8 km deep),

That is not a seismograph recording, it is strain gauge recording. Says so right there. You can't really compare the two.

But something strange happened at NAWS China Lake/Ridgecrest, and those temblors continue to be felt today.

Yes, there was an earthquake.

earthquake.usgs.gov... is a good site to keep handy. Things seem to be settling down some since the peak of the events.

a reply to: Zaphod58
Thanks Zap for the contribution.
This is the device that recorded the seismograph?



I can't answer for www.unavco.org... UNAVCO
They are sponsored by The National Science Foundation and NASA.
And their equipment does appear to be more high tech no?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1

And here is the UNAVCO seismogram of Ridgecrest CA 07/06/2019 at 03:19 (7.0 EQ at 8 km deep),

That is not a seismograph recording, it is strain gauge recording. Says so right there. You can't really compare the two.

But something strange happened at NAWS China Lake/Ridgecrest, and those temblors continue to be felt today.

Yes, there was an earthquake.

You know best Phage. Please provide a USGS seismograph of the said event. Thank you for your contribution.

a reply to: Violater1

Nah, it's your thread maybe you should look for one. A seismograph, I mean.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1

And here is the UNAVCO seismogram of Ridgecrest CA 07/06/2019 at 03:19 (7.0 EQ at 8 km deep),

That is not a seismograph recording, it is strain gauge recording. Says so right there. You can't really compare the two.

But something strange happened at NAWS China Lake/Ridgecrest, and those temblors continue to be felt today.

Yes, there was an earthquake.

Yes, you are correct. A strain meter is MUCH more accurate than a seismograph! According to the USGS," Strainmeters for continuous crustal strain monitoring are highly sensitive instruments with precision of less than 1 part per billion (i.e. less than 1 inch in 16,000 miles). They are usually installed in boreholes where surface noise is greatly reduced. These instruments monitor the change in crustal strain near active faults and volcanoes associated with fault slip, earthquakes, and volcanic activity. Currently, numerous instruments have been installed by the USGS along the San Andreas fault..."
It does NOT show P wave build up. But you knew that.

Looks a lot like the Berkley one.

a reply to: Violater1

No, it's different equipment to take different readings. The seismographs of the earthquake show normal buildup prior to the quake. This was a normal earthquake.

a reply to: Violater1

Yes, you are correct. A strain meter is MUCH more accurate than a seismograph!

When it comes to measuring some aspects of earth movement, yes, indeed. Especially very low frequency events.

But you can't compare the recording to that of a seismograph. Now, if you had strain gauge recordings of the Korea blast, you might have something. Or perhaps you might compare the strain gauge readouts to those of other, normal, quakes.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Violater1

No, it's different equipment to take different readings. The seismographs of the earthquake show normal buildup prior to the quake. This was a normal earthquake.

Please display or provide a link to your example.
A USGS or UNAVCO recording would be acceptable.
And what about the other part of my blog. Those Navy documents are very interesting, no?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1

Yes, you are correct. A strain meter is MUCH more accurate than a seismograph!

When it comes to measuring some aspects of earth movement, yes, indeed. Especially very low frequency events.

But you can't compare the recording to that of a seismograph. Now, if you had strain gauge recordings of the Korea blast, you might have something. Or perhaps you might compare the strain gauge readouts to those of other, normal, quakes.

This is your comment, please back it up with a link or photo with link. You know, like I have.

a reply to: Violater1

This is your comment, please back it up with a link or photo with link. You know, like I have.

Back up what? A suggestion that you compare apples to apples?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1

This is your comment, please back it up with a link or photo with link. You know, like I have.

Back up what? A suggestion that you compare apples to apples?

Your just being silly Phage. You said,"Now, if you had strain gauge recordings of the Korea blast..."
Your comment, so prove me wrong and find a strainmeter of the Koren blast. We both know that it will display much more accurate info than a seismograph. Being that the strainemeter is more accurate.
Waiting for example in 4..3..2..
Crickets.....

a reply to: Violater1

Your just being silly Phage. You said,"Now, if you had strain gauge recordings of the Korea blast..."

Yes, I said "if you had..."

It's your thread, find some apples to compare to support your speculation instead of apples and oranges.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1

Your just being silly Phage. You said,"Now, if you had strain gauge recordings of the Korea blast..."

Yes, I said "if you had..."

It's your thread, find some apples to compare to support your speculation instead of apples and oranges.

You can't win this one, the strainemeter is more accurate.
I know it irks the hell out of you each time I prove you wrong.
May I offer you some cookies, crayons or puppy?
Perhaps a safe place on Portland OR?

a reply to: Violater1
Interesting video here.

a reply to: Violater1

Bud, you don't ask phage to back his words up with a link to proof, he's been here a long time. Is very knowledgeable and doesn't post dodgy info.

Trying to link that earth quake to UFOs is a bit of a reach isn't it? I mean I'm a firm believer in them myself but there's no evidence for this other than speculation.
Was there UFOs sighted on that day? Or more sightings than usual?

a reply to: Violater1

Here. Seismic data from the same people who gave you the strain guage data. You didn't even try, did you? Good work.



Figure 9