It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

MSNBC vs Tulsi Gabbard

page: 1
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 11:39 AM
link   
So watch this interview with Tulsi.



It's the same tactic they always do to her on MSNBC, what about your meeting with Assad? I've seen MSNBC do this to her at least a handful of times using that same tactic. They spend all their time on that when they could be talking in depth about other topics to her.


Tulsi tells her exactly why and they still keep attacking her for not wanting more US Soldiers to needlessly die or get maimed.

I'm a solid conservative and Trump supporter and I can't fault Gabbard for her response even when she hits Trump for Saudi support.

Let's hear what you think.

edit on 2-8-2019 by pavil because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 11:50 AM
link   
a reply to: pavil

Tulsi is simply another extreme leftist who has softer rhetoric. She has a green energy plan that will destroy the US economy, wants strict gun control, and basically every other progressive box is also checked with her. She is just smart enough to not publicly appear extreme.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 11:53 AM
link   
a reply to: pavil

I think Gabbard is even keeled, level headed and will be the first woman president of the United States.
I have found her stances on a number of issues to be based not on party or political ideology but rather on her own experiences and determinations of our nations current strengths and weaknesses.

I was glad to see here stance on impeachment of Trump. She is against it, as am I, knowing the passion with which a large portion of the nation support him. Like her, I see that for those of us who see Trump as a problem, the only way to get past him is not by the impeachment process but rather by defeating him in the general election of 2020.

And we need to remember that many of the pundits in media are little more than ''airheads'' who can only read the major talking points placed in front of their pretty faces.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 11:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: pavil

Tulsi is simply another extreme leftist who has softer rhetoric. She has a green energy plan that will destroy the US economy, wants strict gun control, and basically every other progressive box is also checked with her. She is just smart enough to not publicly appear extreme.


I agree, but it is clear the TPTB on the left have an issue with her. She isn't in their club and clearly an outsider. All one has to do is look at how the leftist media has been treating her.

First, she goes on Jon Stewart a couple of months ago and he is grilling her. Asking all these super detailed questions about Assad, etc. It was clear he was given some talking points to hit her with. Any other politician that goes on a show like that is getting softball questions and yuk yukin it up with the host, but all of a sudden Jon Stewart wants to get in depth on foreign policy?

Second, Google throttled her advertising after the first debate. She was by far the most searched candidate and then all of a sudden her ads start disappearing and search results being skewed. She is suing Google for $50 million now. Twitter apparently did some shenanigans too after the second debate.

Third, now Anderson Cooper and other leftist hacks in the media are beating her up over Assad. It is clearly coordinated.

She is getting the Ron Paul treatment....



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Edumakated

Yes she is getting the Ron Paul treatment. And the Ron Paul treatment was very similar to the Dennis Kucinich treatment as well.

But may I ask, did you possibly mean some one else other than Jon Stewart? He has been off the air since 2015.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:07 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Yeah, meant Stephen Colbert.

Look how tense this interview is... when was the last time you seen Colbert acting this serious with a candidate? Tell me he was not been coached... this was FOUR MONTHS ago. Listen to the questions he is asking about Syria, etc. Even tried to pin a white nationalist to her...


edit on 2-8-2019 by Edumakated because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-8-2019 by Edumakated because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-8-2019 by Edumakated because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:07 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

What are your thoughts on her green energy plan?



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:07 PM
link   
a reply to: pavil


Odd considering she was a member of the CFR, don't ya think?


Link
edit on 2-8-2019 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: pavil

Tulsi is simply another extreme leftist who has softer rhetoric. She has a green energy plan that will destroy the US economy, wants strict gun control, and basically every other progressive box is also checked with her. She is just smart enough to not publicly appear extreme.


Yes she is a Democrat and a Liberal for the most part. Compared to most Dems, she is like Reagan in the 60's. Bucking the Party Line.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:15 PM
link   
If I was forced to choose between the Democrat candidates, it would be Tulsi. I seen she owned Kamala on the debate stage. I also donated a little to her campaign to try and keep the one sane Democrat in the race.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Edumakated


She is getting the Ron Paul treatment....


She sure is. Even worse since it's the DNC MSM doing her in.

I honestly think she has more support from the Right than the Left.

What a scary concept for both Parties.

Imagine a Rand Paul/Tulsi Gabbard ticket in 2024. Either one could headline IMO.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Edumakated

As I figured.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: pavil


Odd considering she was a member of the CFR, don't ya think?


Link


Is the CFR that horrible? Honestly don't know enough about what they have done to form an opinion. Can you shoot me some good links?

If you are looking for perfect Candidates in this day and age, you will have slim pickings.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: pavil

Except she isn't. She is just wiser with her public statements. Policy wise she is a typical progressive. Maybe i am wrong, how does she buck the party policy wise?



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:39 PM
link   
Even the interviewer's demeanor screamed belligerent. Tulsi is not the choice of the legacy media for sure. That has been quite obvious since the beginning. The media have coordinated their scheming, imo, and have chosen two or three they will push.

My view is that TV and cable news media organizations have their own agenda, and it is NOT to inform the American People. It is to take a news event or politician and color it with bias in order to force you to see the picture they want you to see.

Print media does the same thing. Read any NYT political article or WaPo article with open eyes, and you will see that they pepper their articles with descriptive adjectives chosen to skew vulnerable readers subconsciously toward the view the news source wants you to walk away with. They omit clarifying facts and many times tell outright lies that they later "correct" on page 15, bottom of third column.

Trump is 100% right. Fake News is pervasive in msm.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:47 PM
link   
MSNBC & CNN are 100% behind 'Kneepads' Harris.
Nobody whom dares to attack Harris, let alone show her up for the sleazy hipocrite she truly is,...gets away with it on their networks.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Bringing the troops home and investing that money in America is the big thing that I’ve heard.



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 12:59 PM
link   
Just for reference in this thread.

Tulsi on the issues

ETA: After further review, yep she’s just another progressive.
edit on 2-8-2019 by Middleoftheroad because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: pavil

meh
msnbc is anti woman
that is the obvious answer



posted on Aug, 2 2019 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

That's not against the Democrat agenda. It's also not policy. She is for all the progressive policies. She is smarter in public with her words, her policies are progressive liberal policies.



new topics

top topics



 
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join