On July 24 The Franklin Square and Munson Fire District Called for New 9/11 Investigation

a reply to: Hulseyreport

Fat chance.
These promises of "breaking news" have come and gone several times.
If they actually had anything, they wouldn't have waited till years later.

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Hulseyreport

Fat chance.
These promises of "breaking news" have come and gone several times.
If they actually had anything, they wouldn't have waited till years later.

Hulseyreport message is correct.

Richard Gage 1 hour 26 minutes 'Dr Hulsey WTC7 study out September 11th.

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: Jesushere

From what Gage was saying in that podcast, 911 -19 is piling up to quite a day.

Im optimistic

originally posted by: democracydemo
a reply to: Jesushere

From what Gage was saying in that podcast, 911 -19 is piling up to quite a day.

Im optimistic

Really. If they had something “incriminating” would they not be obliged to come forth sooner? Not to milk it for sensationalism? Wonder where their heart really lies? Like there is any doubt at this point?

The WTC 7 Evaluation page still has the old implied date of being released later in 2018...

Dr. Leroy Hulsey gave the following update on March 27, 2018:

To all who have been following the University of Alaska Fairbanks study on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7:

First, I would like to thank you for your interest in and support of the study.

We had planned to release our findings for public review early this year. However, research often takes unexpected turns, and the more complicated the problem, the more difficult it is to predict the completion date. We are still in the process of studying hypothetical collapse mechanisms and attempting to simulate the building’s failure. Our goal is to determine, with a high degree of confidence, the sequence of failures that may have caused the observed collapse and to rule out those mechanisms that could not have caused the observed collapse.

We will release our findings for public review when we are sure we fully understand the mechanisms that are likely to have caused the observed collapse and those that clearly did not occur and could not have caused the observed collapse. We expect to publish our findings later this year, but we will refrain from naming a completion date, given the unpredictability of the research process.

Again, we thank you for your interest in our study and we appreciate your patience as we strive to bring a truly scientific answer to the important question of how WTC 7 collapsed on September 11, 2001.

Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey

Chair, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

University of Alaska Fairbanks

So, still no “promise” date posted on the WTC 7 Evaluation page of AE 9/11 Truth? Not will to publish a date.

a reply to: neutronflux

Not to milk it for sensationalism?

Sensationalism would be fantastic! Yet nothing is rotten in Denmark as the mass media is concerned.

Coverage for all this sensationalism so far:

[1]Federal Grand Jury
[2]New York Area Fire Commissioners Make History, Call for New 9/11 Investigation
[3]FBI Sued for Failure to Report Known 9/11 Evidence to Congress

Serene bliss of silence observed.

Wonder where their heart really lies? Like there is any doubt at this point?

The due process of law.

The WTC 7 Evaluation page still has the old implied date of being released later in 2018...

"It's done when it's done" is what Hulsey was saying between the lines and by 91119 - it will be so, not half-assed.

This must be a threat If Sam and Nufuk show up on page ONE!!

All I can say is... over Dicks dead body will there be an investigation.

a reply to: MALBOSIA

Yep, certainly not over Donald's dead body.

He teased everybody in the campaign, suggesting in his administration the truth would be forthcoming, but he has lip service and deception down to an art form.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: MALBOSIA

Yep, certainly not over Donald's dead body.

He teased everybody in the campaign, suggesting in his administration the truth would be forthcoming, but he has lip service and deception down to an art form.

Everyone candidate makes promises, then they get that first intelligence briefing after they win the primaries and reality sets in.

Trump is probably the most focused on the promises he CAN achieve more than most past presidents but this is a topic that transcends the executive branch.

At this point, it doesn't matter what they find.

a reply to: MALBOSIA

Trump has said a few times that he does not trust the spooks. I don't blame him. So why should he care about what they say? The spooks have been in the drugs business for half a century.

As far as I can see, he is not willing to face death for telling the truth. He would rather pretend, and keep repeating the lies told for 18 years.

originally posted by: confirm3
At this point, it doesn't matter what they find.

You are right about that, though there are always exceptions to everything.

It doesn't matter because the treasury has already been plundered, the humans have already died, the 4th amendment has already been rendered null & void, and government agents pat you down in airline terminals as the result of a magnificent deception, and so much more.

All that would matter now is that the truth be told in public, that the truth be acknowledged in public, if we were truly a civilized and intelligent society.

Instead, many have still not realized that our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of, quoting from Edward Bernays.

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: confirm3
At this point, it doesn't matter what they find.

You are right about that, though there are always exceptions to everything.

It doesn't matter because the treasury has already been plundered, the humans have already died, the 4th amendment has already been rendered null & void, and government agents pat you down in airline terminals as the result of a magnificent deception, and so much more.

All that would matter now is that the truth be told in public, that the truth be acknowledged in public, if we were truly a civilized and intelligent society.

Instead, many have still not realized that our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of, quoting from Edward Bernays.

What’s your evidence that nukes were used at the WTC? That is your pet theory?

So, it's 9/11/19.

Dr Hulsey WTC7 study out September 11th

I never understand why people don't believe them when they themselves said that there were bombs in the building.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: confirm3
At this point, it doesn't matter what they find.

You are right about that, though there are always exceptions to everything.
The evidence is everywhere, from lateral ejection of huge structural pieces to oddly burned vehicles to first responders with radiation poisoning to hot spots visible from space to chemical byproducts of nuclear fission.

But one must have an open mind and a certain amount of curiosity.

Individuals in denial of reality are unable to see the forest or the trees.

It doesn't matter because the treasury has already been plundered, the humans have already died, the 4th amendment has already been rendered null & void, and government agents pat you down in airline terminals as the result of a magnificent deception, and so much more.

All that would matter now is that the truth be told in public, that the truth be acknowledged in public, if we were truly a civilized and intelligent society.

Instead, many have still not realized that our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of, quoting from Edward Bernays.

What’s your evidence that nukes were used at the WTC? That is your pet theory?

The evidence is everywhere, but one must be a curious person with an open mind to see it, or rather, to understand what it is.

From the lateral ejection of huge structural pieces, to strangely burned vehicles to months worth of molten iron to chemical residue of nuclear fission to first responders with radiation poisoning.

It's everywhere, but the man in denial has his eyes closed.

a reply to: Salander

And some (we know who they are) never give a straight answer and always turn the burden of proof on the other.
Ex: " Did you see him set up the explosives as proof? "
" Do you have a video as proof of the agents when they remote-controlled the planes into the towers? "

That kind of "answer" just to divert from answering problematic questions that wouldn't fit their... oops, the government agenda. All they do, is believe the NIST Report, Megabunk sh''t and act as 12 year olds.
No brains, just sheep.

a reply to: Salander

You

The evidence is everywhere, but one must be a curious person with an open mind to see it, or rather, to understand what it is.

Really. No big booms. No seismic evidence. No fission products. The core columns were still sanding from the foundations under the debris pile, with the bed rock intact to build more skyscrapers, and slurry walls intact. So no evidence of nukes in the structure or bedrock.

From the lateral ejection of huge structural pieces,

Wrong. Core columns toppled out. They were not ejected.

to strangely burned vehicles

You mean like half burnt cars that had unmelted plastic in the unburnt sections. That were not contaminated with radiation from fission products.

months worth of molten iron

Which is blatantly false. There was no molten iron. There wouldn’t be pure molten anything at the pile. The pile was kept hot by smoldering. The pile was sprayed with water to control flashing and heat. Molten iron makes violent steam explosions when in contact with water. If the pile was kept hot by the decay of fission products, you would have radiation levels higher than Fukushima. People would have dropped dead from radiation after a few hours on site at the pile. There would have to be more radioactive material than Fukushima’s reactor. That counts out mini nukes. There were no frozen “puddles” of iron at the bottom of the debris piles.

chemical residue of nuclear fissioN

Again, there was no fission products from a nuke setting off.

first responders with radiation poisoning.

Than state what individuals had radiation poisoning? And how they didn’t track radioactive contamination everywhere through the city and home?

It's everywhere, but the man in denial has his eyes closed.

No. There is zero evidence nukes brought down the WTC. And you use blatant falsehoods.