It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Discrepancies in Social Media Followers of Politicians with Votes.

page: 1
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:27 PM
link   
While there will be people claiming "but not everyone is on social media" the fact is there is a large section of the U.S. population on social media, yet for some reason ALL democrats have less social media followers than POTUS Trump whom to this day has over 62 million followers on Twitter.

There will be some who will claim "but a lot of democrats don't have money to be in social media." That is actually hogwash, because there is a large following of U.S. seniors, most whom are not rich, and they do have a social media presence. But the fact is a large majority of all the people living in the U.S. do have and use social media.

According to the "Statista" website there are "approximately 247 million U.S. social media users as of 2019. "



Percentage of U.S. population who currently use any social media from 2008 to 2019

Despite the FACT that social media giants are ALL Liberal, and have been shadow banning and even banning conservatives in their anti- right-wing bias, this has not deterred the U.S. citizens and legal residents whom subscribe as leaning "right-wing" and as backing POTUS Trump.

Does anyone remember how before the elections Hillary Clinton's rallies were half empty meanwhile Trump's rallies were not only full, but there were always long lines outside the rallies hoping to get in?

Hillary Clinton's rallies vs Trump rallies before the 2016 elections.





Why don't polls reflect turnout at Trump rallies?


Now let's see how many social media followers do democrats have vs POTUS Trump.

Let's start with democrat/liberals/socialists.

AOC = 5 million followers.



Bernie Sanders = 9.4 million followers.



Hillary Clinton = 25 million followers.



Joe Biden = 3.6 million followers. (whom supposedly has the most votes from democrats so far)



POTUS Donald J. Trump = 62.4 million followers.



In Facebook POTUS Trump has 25,661,742 followers.

Hillary Clinton has 9,576,841 million followers

Bernie Sanders has 5,002,328

Joe Biden has 1,501,042

AOC has 981,935 (not even a million)


Despite the fact that Hillary Clinton has had a low percentage of social media followers, and despite the fact that Trump's following from the start surpassed any democrat rally, for some "unexplained reason" *wink* we are told Hillary won the "popular vote..."

Meanwhile it is true that Trump's social media followers have increased, we are being told again by the left-wing media that "Biden" will be elected.

Yes, it is true I have left out other democrats, but even combined they do not amount to how many followers POTUS Trump has.

Will we see once more the discrepancies of voters vs social media followers of which almost 80% of the entire U.S. population do have a presence in social media?





edit on 29-7-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comments and add links.



+2 more 
posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:32 PM
link   
And I believe a high percentage of "Followers" of Democrats are a combination of fake bot accounts and single personalities with 100s possibly 1000s of **duplicate accounts -- different names** managed by PR firms paid to promote Democrat BS 😎💫🥶



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:43 PM
link   
I think it's foolish to think that just because someone can fill STADIUMS and someone can't fill a broom closet, that it's any indication of the followers they have.

Right? Seems logical. Right?

Here's my friend van jones to tell you why.
edit on 29-7-2019 by MisterSpock because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:44 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

They will claim the same thing, in fact someone will come along shortly proclaiming that "60 million followers of POTUS Trump are bots or... RUSSIANS... oO

So let's say the social media following are accurate. Remember that almost 80% of the entire U.S. population do have a social media presence. To me, social media followers is more precise than any other statistic there is.

Also remember that social media giants, including twitter, have been banning a lot of conservative sites/followers.





edit on 29-7-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: xuenchen

They will claim the same thing, in fact someone will come along shortly proclaiming that "60 million followers of POTUS Trump are bots or... RUSSIANS... oO

So let's say the social media following are accurate. Remember that almost 80% of the entire U.S. population do have a social media presence. To me, social media followers is more precise than any other statistic there is.


To be fair, I'm sure there is a large amount of followers to trump that LIVE for his every tweet.

Just about the entire media and a vast amount of those that are addicted to being triggered by his every word.

Not saying it's most of his followers, but I'm sure the people that follow hillary actual endorse her(just about all of them) while trump has a spectrum of everyone.
edit on 29-7-2019 by MisterSpock because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:49 PM
link   
a reply to: MisterSpock

Again, remember that i proved that a large percentage of the entire U.S. population, almost 80%, does have a social media presence. So why is it that democrats/liberals/socialists have the least amount of followers despite the anti-Trump and shadow bans and outright bans which conservatives/right-wingers have been going through because of the LIBERAL social media bias?



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:52 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Doesn't obama's twitter have like 80 million followers are some crazy number like that?


I looked it up. Obama has 104 million followers. I guess obama wins whatever silly contest this thread was about.......



edit on 29-7-2019 by scraedtosleep because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:53 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I remember Hillary Clinton complaining feverishly that the Macedonian Troll Farms were her exclusive problem 🥶



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:55 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Big Media Tech - Eenie Meanie Mineie Mo , Catch a Conservative Tiger by his Toe . If he Hollers , go Tell him to Blow , but Judgement Day is Rapidly Coming , so Ho Ho Ho Ho ............
edit on 29-7-2019 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:55 PM
link   



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock
...
Not saying it's most of his followers, but I'm sure the people that follow hillary actual endorse her(just about all of them) while trump has a spectrum of everyone.


Why is that? Why isn't it possible that Hillary also has a large amount of followers who don't like her, but follow her to see what she says? The same can be said of other democrats/liberals/socialists. You can't just say "only a percentage of those who follow Trump just want to see what he says but don't like him."



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:58 PM
link   
As a frequent twitter user, you start to notice things as well.

Most Democrats average around 1.5k to 5k likes on any given day, give or take a thousand or two, but usually always hovers around that mark.

That includes AOC, the squad and other Democrats.

However, during hot bed issues, those likes somehow jump up over a 100k and that's it.

Recently, Cummings enjoyed a nice twitter boost only for the support to drop after a couple days and back to 1.5k likes and now also getting RATIOED as we speak.

Trump has never been RATIOED and averages 33k to 65k likes for each tweet EVERY SINGLE DAY.

His Nationalist and Patriotic tweets net 100k and above.



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 10:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Doesn't obama's twitter have like 80 million followers are some crazy number like that?


I looked it up. Obama has 104 million followers. I guess obama wins whatever silly contest this thread was about.......


Except that Obama has a large following outside the U.S. He is the first black POTUS. While POTUS Trump also has a following outside the U.S. it is not as large as Obama's because Obama is the "first black President." Just like those left-wing voters who simply voted for him for the color of his skin and not the content of his policies.



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 11:01 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

These were the numbers 4 months before the election.




As of July this year, @realDonaldTrump had 10,267,655 followers, placing him in 177th position among the global Twitterati. If elected tomorrow, he would be the third most followed world leader. (Pope Francis has 30 million followers and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi has 20 million.) With her 7,765,519 followers @HillaryClinton is in 275th position worldwide and would be the fourth most followed world leader.


But we know that they both got over 60 million votes each.
So twitter really is not an accurate indicator of how people vote.



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 11:04 PM
link   
It should be noted that we live in a media based society, so by contrast, if you look at celebrity tweets, especially the latest "hottness" if you know what I mean, can pull upwards of 500k likes and upwards.

Infact, we saw this with Trump when he tweeted about ASAP Rocky and netted over 500k likes...for a celebrity.

Not policy, reform or government, but to release a celebrity.

Justin bieber tweeted his "thanks to Trump" then turned around and requested the "caged kids be set free", moron, and netted close to 900k likes and might even be over a Million now.

Point is, celebrities naturally bring in massive likes as they are the real metric, but politicians? Its a miracle we even see those kinds of invested "Likes" with Trump and others.



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 11:05 PM
link   
If I recall correctly Clinton won the popular vote by 2 million but 4-5 million of those votes came from just 2 places,
California and New York.

Take those 2 out of the equation and factor in the lost votes and various other forms of fraud and Trump absolutely flogged her.

I appreciate those 2 places are packed with crazy people so she would have won there anyway but I think you would have to be crazy or in a huge amount of denial to deny that large amounts of voter fraud took place on Hillary’s behalf.

The stunts the Dems are willing to pull to get extra votes is absolutely sickening, even with all the schenanigans they are still going to get walloped.
The latest scheme where someone can vote on behalf of upto 8 other people should have even the most tragic sufferers of TDS worried.


Trump 2020


And just to piss people off, Ivanka 2024-2028



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 11:12 PM
link   
I just watched that first vid in the OP

That is just embarrassing, she literally couldn’t get even 50 people to those events.
And that woman trying to warm up the crowd, even the Hillary supporters looked embarrassed for her.

How anyone can watch those vids and still believe the MSM nonsense that Trump is unpopular or even hated is just mind boggling for me



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 11:19 PM
link   
Doesn't following someone on twitter just mean they get updates when that person posts something?

I don't have twitter so I am asking.



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 11:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
Doesn't following someone on twitter just mean they get updates when that person posts something?

I don't have twitter so I am asking.


Correct but it is also an indicator of their level of public engagement.
It’s not hard to extrapolate that more followers on social media means more real life support ie votes



posted on Jul, 29 2019 @ 11:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
...
But we know that they both got over 60 million votes each.
So twitter really is not an accurate indicator of how people vote.


Yet again, Hillary could not fill her rallies meanwhile Trump not only filled his rallies, but there were lines always waiting outside of people whom wanted to get in his rallies.

Almost 80% of the entire U.S. population has a social media presence. Taking into account Trump rallies and his social media followers they are good indicators of whom has a better chance at winning.

Statistics are usually lauded as good indicators even though they might have asked at most 10,000 people. But for some reason social media, and rallies in which tens of thousands and millions of people subscribe to can't be used as an indicator of whom has the most votes






edit on 29-7-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.




top topics



 
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join