It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tileman
a reply to: daskakik
They don't look dissimilar either, especially dead without expression. Though it was mentioned the photo of the body seemed pinker, had coarser ears and a different nose than Epstein.
I'm not saying there was a switch, but figured it was time to figure out how to do pics.....and it would make the doj look much less pathetic if there were one made.
Now to see if I got it right.(pain in the butt to do 2 on a phone.)
originally posted by: LanceCorvette
What I posted is not junk. I posted a succinct statement of the law based on my 20+ years of actually working with these laws. I expounded on it because you insisted on being wrong despite my explaining it to you.
It is junk because everybody already knows the rules, so how are you explaining them better? My post clearly assumed the rules were not to be followed, but you want to dwell on them and talk down to other members anyway.
Second, your original post to which I replied stated "The Defence has to present witnesses on their own, not ask the prosecution for them" so you did in fact make a statement about the burden of the defense to present witnesses. Again, I just made a clear statement of the burdens of proof in a criminal trial.
There's nothing about my statement that requires your correction. It's entirely up to the defense to produce witnesses, is it not? Certainly there is no "burden" on them, and I never said there was...you made that up out of thin air.
Last, there's a great coffee mug you can get that has the slogan, "Don't mistake your 30 second internet search for my 25 years of experience." If JE is the only person (for example) who can say that Bob was at a certain party at a certain time and committed a crime, then JE is the accuser in Bob's prosecution for being at that party at that time. And Bob has a Constitutional right to confront and cross-examine JE on that accusation.
Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 803. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay Rule 803. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay Primary tabs The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness:
(5) Recorded Recollection. A record that: (A) is on a matter the witness once knew about but now cannot recall well enough to testify fully and accurately; (B) was made or adopted by the witness when the matter was fresh in the witness’s memory; and (C) accurately reflects the witness’s knowledge. If admitted, the record may be read into evidence but may be received as an exhibit only if offered by an adverse party.
Soros has categorically denied receiving money from drug cartels or any form of criminal activity. The fact remains, however, that at least some of his financial operations have been based offshore, in banking and financial centers that are widely reported to be considered conducive to money-laundering. The Soros fund is based in the Netherlands Antilles, a self-governing federation of five Caribbean islands. A CIA factbook describes the region as “a transshipment point for South American drugs bound for the US and Europe; money-laundering center.”
Please pray for Kathy Hall who is a whistleblower against #CPS Arkansas. She was on her way to DC to testify and now is missing. Her phone was pinged in Colorado. Where is Kathy.
She was friends with #LindaCollinsSmith who was investigating CPS before she was murdered.
Her name was #LindaCollinsSmith and she deserved every chance and opportunity in the world. She was saving children from the clutches of #childsextrafficking and she was murdered for her work. #ClintonBodyCount