It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: trollz
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: trollz
You don't have the right to go up to someone demand they labor for you. That's slavery.
It's not slavery if laboring for you is what that person is literally being paid to do during the normal course of their work schedule. If you go to a hospital and are seen by a nurse, that nurse is being paid to see you during her working hours. They're not calling in some other nurse who is off duty and telling her to come in and work for free.
originally posted by: neutronflux
Any who. When seen how well government has managed social security. You think government is going to manage a healthcare system any better.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
There is absolutely no way you can fix the runaway costs in either of these two industries until you, through legislation, address outrageous damage awards. And, to start this discussion you can't start it with the low hanging fruit, you have to start the discussion right at the very most difficult part...how much is a life worth? This is the absolute crux of the issue.
If you don't start there, nothing will change. You have to start there because only then can you work backwards into establishing values for everything short of the upper limit. Otherwise, there is no way to contain the damages, which is exactly what we're seeing in this country right now. The United States ranks #1 in damage lawsuits world over, by orders of magnitude. This has got to STOP!
Otherwise...you might as well just suck it up. No use complaining about it, because nothing, and I mean nothing, will change!
I understand what you are saying, but to clarify...
Surely you aren't saying that doctors and/or hospitals shouldn't be held responsible for someones death or permanent disability when it is due to some negligent action by someone at the hospital or the doctor?
Surely you aren't saying that if I'm in an accident and some idiot at the hospital didn't read my chart and gave me something that I was allergic to and I died, that they shouldn't be held financially responsible? My wife and children no longer have a husband/father/provider - so, surely you aren't saying they should just 'suck it up'?
originally posted by: Brian4real
Well it could be considered a form of gambling...
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
Not even remotely suggesting there should be no legal remedy for liability. What I am suggesting is that damages should be capped at reasonable levels, not insane unreasonable levels like they are now in the U.S.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: tanstaafl
Well, sure. I was going to start a little higher and a little different. Remember we're establishing an absolute max cap. So...
Let's say something like 20x annual salary as reported on federal tax returns averaged over five years.