It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House Judiciary Committee Hearing - Oversight of Report into Russia Investigation - Live Link

page: 17
40
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Nunes exposing some of the BS in "The Report".

Mueller nervous can't rebut 😎




posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:25 PM
link   
Schiff outlining failures of the Administration in power during the 2016 election 😎



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:26 PM
link   
Mueller confirms some Russian ads were in favor of Clinton !!!!! 😎



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Nunes exposing some of the BS in "The Report".

Mueller nervous can't rebut 😎


He looks like he's never even heard of some of these facts.



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: Drucifer


I haven't read through this entire thread, but I've read elsewhere that Mueller said if Trump weren't president, he would have been charged, did he say that?


No, he refused to answer that question.

He did say that Trump could be indicted after he leaves office, but he never said for what because he's not allowed to say because he never gave a reason in his report.


Ah, my wording wasn't word for word (I didn't get to see the hearing myself)

This is what I was referring to-




Rep. Buck: "Was there sufficient evidence to convict President Trump or anyone else with obstruction of justice?"

Mueller: "We did not make that calculation."

Buck: "How could you not have made the calculation?"

Mueller: "The Office of Legal Counsel indicates that we can not indict a sitting President. So one of the tools that a prosecutor should use is not there."

Buck: "Could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?"

Mueller: "Yes."

Buck:"You believe that you could charge the president of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?"

Mueller:"Yes."

Rep. Lieu: "The reason again that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of OLC opinion stating that you could not indict a sitting president, correct?"

Mueller: "That is correct."


youtu.be...
youtu.be...



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Drucifer

he didn't say he intended to or recommended such
trump can be charged with anything after he leaves office



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:32 PM
link   
oops
tripped up again
we did not make any determination

nice clarification

ends the bs



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:33 PM
link   
Devin Nunes: "Democrats have argued for years that evidence of collusion is just around the corner. Like the Loch Ness Monster."




posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:34 PM
link   
he wont get within a 10' pole of steele

ask him about the concord case
ask him



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:34 PM
link   
Christopher Steele ---

The Dossier ---

The FISA Warrants ---

Mueller hemming and hawing gulping gasping 😎



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:34 PM
link   
FYI

The DOJ is not letting him talk about the start of the investigation and Steele Dossier.

AG Barr for some reason doesnt want that info out.



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:36 PM
link   
there is no crown prosecutor of russia

lol

for a senator to read that as fact is hillaryious



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Yes, I agree with your telling of the story. The intelligence commitee, seems to really be attemptingvto "T" things up.



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
FYI

The DOJ is not letting him talk about the start of the investigation and Steele Dossier.

AG Barr for some reason doesnt want that info out.

Can you cite a source please? That is interesting if true and implies active investigation, which I am all for.
edit on 24-7-2019 by BlueJacket because: sp



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Drucifer

Once again, you can "charge" anyone with anything. Just because they can make a charge doesn't mean that they have the evidence to convict. That's why Mueller had to come back at the beginning of "Round 2" and clarify his statement by admitting that they made NO DETERMINATION on whether or not they could prove that Trump committed a crime.



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:42 PM
link   
oops
the hammer falls on exonerate again

lol
no office of exoneration



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:42 PM
link   
Dang!
Turner just ripped him up!
Mueller is embarrassing



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
FYI

The DOJ is not letting him talk about the start of the investigation and Steele Dossier.

AG Barr for some reason doesnt want that info out.


Ongoing indictment proceedings are active 😎



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Martin75

That was great...right? What does someone have on him so that he would take a fall like this today.


It is almost as if they. the left, are doing this to discredit him so that they can move forward with another investigation...



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:44 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Damn, Turner is a Bulldog, Im having a drink now, Im so pleased




top topics



 
40
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join