It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why I Hate You and You Are A Stupid Racist

page: 10
51
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 22 2019 @ 09:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
This is what happened with Trump right, he became President although many feel as you do about these Congresswomen about him.

The difference being, Trump loves this country, and makes it clear with his words and deeds.

These 4 women hate this country, and make that clear with the vast majority of the words and deeds.

Trump haters hate Trump because ... TDS/orange man bad.

AOC/Ilhan/Talib/Pressley haters hate them because they spew vile crap about our country and a majority of the people in it.

Do you not see the difference?


Why not let it take its proper course and if the new Congresswomen are disapproved of they will be out in no time.

Why spew the same? Hate and Filth?

Because truth?

But no worries, they will be out next year.


Bout time for a false flag.

Thats about the only thing that might save the deep state filth, but even that may not work this time, far more people are 'woke' - and I mean really 'woke' (not the PC crap) - now.




posted on Jul, 22 2019 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

I feel devastatingly sorry for so many of you. You can't see what love is and you insist on not being honest. Clearly many of us hate some of the policies of our government but that has zero to do with love/hate for our country.

I can tell you there is a day coming when we all will pay for the hate we spread and spew.

My son has traveled the whole world and he has been treated with respect and care everywhere.

One elderly couple in Mexico in the desert with nothing but a few mesquite trees to burn to cook, a goat for milk and corn grown with well water they carry to it. They make their cheese and grind the corn to make tortillas and that is all they had, in a mud hut cooking on a hot rock they insisted he and his friends eat their food. All they had and it was given with a smile. They were offer comfort and place to stay anywhere they went. If they looked thirst it never failed someone would come and offer them drink.

None of us can come close to decency, here we have huge churches made with donated money that refuse to house struggling AMERICAS in a disaster. Love a Country how about learning to love humans and feel what it would be like to have your infant grabbed from you when you come asking for help.

You sound like Children with zero knowledge of life or what it means to love.



posted on Jul, 22 2019 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
I feel devastatingly sorry for so many of you.

Please, don't waste your sympathy on me.


You can't see what love is and you insist on not being honest.

I think most of us know very well the difference between true love of country and our fellow citizens, and the hate the left spews while trying to disguise it as 'love'.


Clearly many of us hate some of the policies of our government but that has zero to do with love/hate for our country.

I agree, but that isn't what the likes of AOC, Elmi, Talib and Pressley are doing. They espouse hatred of everything that is America.


I can tell you there is a day coming when we all will pay for the hate we spread and spew.

Yes, there is... and in 2020, the dems will realize this in a big way when the Republicans retake the House, expand their Senate lead (maybe even to a super-majority), and Trump is re-elected winning the popular vote as well as the Electoral vote.

I look forward to it.


My son has traveled the whole world and he has been treated with respect and care everywhere.

Yes, yes, I know, 'everywhere' but the US is just one big love fest. Please. Spare me.


One elderly couple in Mexico in the desert with nothing but a few mesquite trees to burn to cook, a goat for milk and corn grown with well water they carry to it. They make their cheese and grind the corn to make tortillas and that is all they had, in a mud hut cooking on a hot rock they insisted he and his friends eat their food.

So, we're supposed to believe that your son and his friends were just wandering around in the Mexican desert, and happened upon a lone elderly couple who proved that Trump is a racist pig because they gave them some food?


None of us can come close to decency,

I know, it is shocking and despicable how the dems call anyone and everyone that disagrees with their socialist policies racist fascist whatever-phobes.


here we have huge churches made with donated money that refuse to house struggling AMERICAS in a disaster. Love a Country how about learning to love humans and feel what it would be like to have your infant grabbed from you when you come asking for help.

30% (that is an estimate on the low side) of these so-called 'family units' aren't families, the children are being trafficked.

But I agree, we should be taking care of our own, but you do that by giving people a hand-up, not hand-outs.


You sound like Children with zero knowledge of life or what it means to love.

You sound like a child who thinks they know better than their parents, with all of those hard life-lessons waiting to bitch-slap you upside the head.



posted on Jul, 22 2019 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Again I feel sorry for you, I am not a "Dem" and I don't know Mr. Trump so I can neither love nor hate someone especially when almost anything I hear will be skewed one way or another and I am wise enough to know this.

I am very old and have seen more than you can even dream of, and yes my Son was just wandering around in the desert how odd you would think that made up.

And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.

You know if you really loved America at least you would love Democrats to.
edit on 22-7-2019 by SeaWorthy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2019 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
yes my Son was just wandering around in the desert how odd you would think that made up.

How odd that you don't see that as anything but (very) odd...


You know if you really loved America at least you would love Democrats to.

I do. What is masquerading as democrats today aren't, they are rabid psychotic PC individuals who will do or say anything to get elected or remain in power and/or to consolidate their power.
edit on 22-7-2019 by tanstaafl because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2019 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
yes my Son was just wandering around in the desert how odd you would think that made up.

How odd that you don't see that as anything but (very) odd...


You know if you really loved America at least you would love Democrats to.

I do. What is masquerading as democrats today aren't, they are rabid psychotic PC individuals who will do or say anything to get elected or remain in power and/or to consolidate their power.


You are talking about Americans, everyday Families.
Among the 31 states (plus D.C.) with party registration, there are nearly 12 million more registered Democrats than Republicans.



posted on Jul, 22 2019 @ 04:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
"I do. What is masquerading as democrats today aren't, they are rabid psychotic PC individuals who will do or say anything to get elected or remain in power and/or to consolidate their power."

You are talking about Americans, everyday Families.
Among the 31 states (plus D.C.) with party registration, there are nearly 12 million more registered Democrats than Republicans.

Actually, I misspoke...

I should have said 'some democrats'. Obviously, from my context, I'm only talking about the rabid, psychotic PC obsessed individuals who accuse anyone who disagrees with them as a racist everything-a-phobe.

Thanks for making me clarify...

Oh - and the democrat party is hemorrhaging members right now, see #walkaway and #blexit. Sane democrats can't abide what is happening to the party as evidenced by all of the democrat presidential candidates, with the exception of Tulsi Gabbard, and maybe the crazy crystal lady who wants to just love everyone into submission.
edit on 22-7-2019 by tanstaafl because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2019 @ 08:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: DBCowboy
too early to just shoot the bastards.


It's never too early to go hunting. The game is always out there.



You guys aren't scary try harder next time.


*fap fap fap* civil war *fap fap fap*

😭😭😂😭



posted on Jul, 22 2019 @ 10:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chr0naut
"You forgot one other option...

He is referring to them on political philosophy ('radical leftist/socialist/communist') grounds."

That doesn't fly either.

What country is he referring to as 'radical leftist/socialist/communist', then?

He didn't say 'country'... but I agree it can be inferred.

Regardless, he also encouraged them to come back (and show us they fixed problems where they came from, as opposed to just hating on America).

Now, I ask you, would a racist invite them to come back? This right here is what proves that it wasn't 'racist', but purely philosophical.


In fact, don't you see it as a little bit weird that someone says something that is a bit 'off color' ethically, and you guys keep making all these dubious attempts at excuses? Why would you all need to make excuses all the time for such serial buffoonery?

what I find laughable is TDS sufferers who twist and shout to try to claim he is racist - but I guess thats all you have left, since 'Russia' is a proven hoax.


Proven hoax?

Russian interference in the 2016 election — by the numbers - Boston Globe

You jumped from no-one being charged over it, to it being a hoax. Please explain your reasoning.



posted on Jul, 23 2019 @ 03:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
"What I find laughable is TDS sufferers who twist and shout to try to claim he is racist - but I guess thats all you have left, since 'Russia' is a proven hoax."

Proven hoax?

Yes. Not sure where you have been, but that Turkey was gobbled up some time ago.



Russian interference in the 2016 election — by the numbers - Boston Globe

You jumped from no-one being charged over it, to it being a hoax. Please explain your reasoning.

First, I was obviously talking about the 'Russia Collusion' hoax. You know, the 2 1/2 year long travesty where they pretended to investigate the Trump campaign for colluding with the evil Russians to steal the election, to give them time to try to create another hoax - the 'Obstruction of Justice' hoax?

But Ok, you want to talk about the 'Russian Meddling' hoax...

First, there is zero hard evidence that the Russian government was in any way involved in meddling in our elections. And spare me the '17 Intelligence agencies agree' crap, because it is just that. They all agree, based on opinion and innuendo, nothing more.

But try this on:

"Do I believe Russia meddled in our election? I'm not sure I understand the question. How did they meddle, exactly? By exposing the rigged DNC primary? Is that what you mean? That really turned the Democratic National Convention on its ear, didn't it? Remember how badly Bernie Sanders's supporters were treated? Remember how the Clinton people basically bullied them into silence? Remember when Wasserman Shultz was booed off the stage at the Florida delegation breakfast for being a cheat? Or when Donna Brazile was booed at the opening of the Democratic National Convention? That's probably why she wrote that book, admitting that the Clinton campaign took over the DNC. Wasn't Donna Brazile fired from CNN for colluding with Clinton? I think she was."
(From the above linked article)



posted on Jul, 23 2019 @ 03:52 PM
link   
“Russia influenced the election”

That’s a lie perpetuated by the thick, the easily manipulated and the wilfully ignorant
edit on 23 7 2019 by Breakthestreak because: (no reason given)

edit on 23 7 2019 by Breakthestreak because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 23 2019 @ 04:23 PM
link   
What the lying leftists REFUSE to acknowledge is:
MILLIONS of aussies, Europeans, Africans, asians, Americans CONSTANTLY flooding “the net” with

Anti trump racist trump bigot trump rapist trump anti trump anti trump anti trump

For MONTHS leading up to the elections

Then they STILL LOST

But “ze Russians” influenced the elections

Yeah right

And then, you get the moronic ones saying “I still hear Russian lies on here” while he says “Trump is anti immigrant”

The irony is lost on them, due to their IQ level
edit on 23 7 2019 by Breakthestreak because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chr0naut
"What I find laughable is TDS sufferers who twist and shout to try to claim he is racist - but I guess thats all you have left, since 'Russia' is a proven hoax."

Proven hoax?

Yes. Not sure where you have been, but that Turkey was gobbled up some time ago.



Russian interference in the 2016 election — by the numbers - Boston Globe

You jumped from no-one being charged over it, to it being a hoax. Please explain your reasoning.

First, I was obviously talking about the 'Russia Collusion' hoax. You know, the 2 1/2 year long travesty where they pretended to investigate the Trump campaign for colluding with the evil Russians to steal the election, to give them time to try to create another hoax - the 'Obstruction of Justice' hoax?


The investigation was never into 'Russian collusion'. It was Trump who fabricated that headline. The terms of the investigation were outlined in the appointment letter for the Special Counsel. They didn't waver from the terms of that, as evidenced by the conclusions of the Mueller report.


But Ok, you want to talk about the 'Russian Meddling' hoax...


There were at least two Russian troll farms identified to have produced targeted fake items on Fakebork, Instascam and Twitner that are known to have reached 126 million on Fakebork alone.

Just because you are neither a woman or a youth means that it is unlikely that you received any of those targeted fake posts. Due to the way content is quickly cycled out of the 'walls' of people, there is little audit trail for the evidence, except in the Fakebork, and Twitner logs.

Twitner in their efforts to clean things up afterward, deleted 200,000 tweets by known Russian trolls. That's a lot of posts that you deny existed.

Not only that, but they paid for, and organized actual rallies, such as the June 2016 "March for Trump" rally in New York and the July 2016 "Down with Hillary" rally in New York.

It was big, it was organized, there is a ton of evidence and they reached millions of people. Yet you think it was fake.

Well, what is your opinion based on? How does it compare to the Mueller report's conclusions and the online logs at a number of social media companies, and the hacked data from all sorts of locations released over the web and the outcomes of FBI investigations and etc...?


First, there is zero hard evidence that the Russian government was in any way involved in meddling in our elections. And spare me the '17 Intelligence agencies agree' crap, because it is just that. They all agree, based on opinion and innuendo, nothing more.

But try this on:

"Do I believe Russia meddled in our election? I'm not sure I understand the question. How did they meddle, exactly? By exposing the rigged DNC primary? Is that what you mean? That really turned the Democratic National Convention on its ear, didn't it? Remember how badly Bernie Sanders's supporters were treated? Remember how the Clinton people basically bullied them into silence? Remember when Wasserman Shultz was booed off the stage at the Florida delegation breakfast for being a cheat? Or when Donna Brazile was booed at the opening of the Democratic National Convention? That's probably why she wrote that book, admitting that the Clinton campaign took over the DNC. Wasn't Donna Brazile fired from CNN for colluding with Clinton? I think she was."
(From the above linked article)


Collusion is not a Federal crime and means something different in legal terms than the way you are applying it.

The Legal definition of collusion: to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair market advantage. It is an agreement among firms or individuals to divide a market, set prices, limit production or limit opportunities.



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 09:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
The investigation was never into 'Russian collusion'. It was Trump who fabricated that headline.

Yeah, sorry, but that is pure bullpuckey and you know it.

All the MSM did for 2 1/2+ years was harp on about collusion, and apparently it was ABC News that was first to use the term (not Trump).


The terms of the investigation were outlined in the appointment letter for the Special Counsel. They didn't waver from the terms of that, as evidenced by the conclusions of the Mueller report.

Irrelevant, as this letter wasn't made public until... when? About May of 2017?


There were at least two Russian troll farms identified to have produced targeted fake items on Fakebork, Instascam and Twitner that are known to have reached 126 million on Fakebork alone.

Yeah, and those silly stupid Americans, they saw one of these stupid memes, and oh my gawd! They were turned into brainwashed Russian proxy votes!

Give me a break. I saw a web page once showing many if not most of the crap these morons posted. Anyone who was influenced by that junk is a waste of space.

Oh... and there is nothing to prove that these 'Russians' were in any way connected to the Russian government.


Twitner in their efforts to clean things up afterward, deleted 200,000 tweets by known Russian trolls. That's a lot of posts that you deny existed.

I never said they didn't exist. I said they were irrelevant drivel, but more importantly, had zero influence on the election.


Not only that, but they paid for, and organized actual rallies, such as the June 2016 "March for Trump" rally in New York and the July 2016 "Down with Hillary" rally in New York.

Yeah, yeah, and they also organized these:

July 9: Support Hillary. Save American Muslims Washington, D.C.
Nov. 12: Trump is NOT my President New York
Nov. 19: Charlotte Against Trump Charlotte, N.C.

So what?


It was big, it was organized, there is a ton of evidence and they reached millions of people. Yet you think it was fake.

What is fake are the claims that Trump and/or anyone in his campaign had anything to do with it.


Well, what is your opinion based on?

Facts in evidence.


How does it compare to the Mueller report's conclusions and the online logs at a number of social media companies, and the hacked data from all sorts of locations released over the web and the outcomes of FBI investigations and etc...?

Irrelevant. It was all garbage posts, and it had zero influence on the election, and it was not connected to the russian Government.

You know - all of the things that the MSM claimed for 2 1/2+ years. That Russia Hoax.


"First, there is zero hard evidence that the Russian government was in any way involved in meddling in our elections. And spare me the '17 Intelligence agencies agree' crap, because it is just that. They all agree, based on opinion and innuendo, nothing more.

But try this on:

"Do I believe Russia meddled in our election? I'm not sure I understand the question. How did they meddle, exactly? By exposing the rigged DNC primary? Is that what you mean? That really turned the Democratic National Convention on its ear, didn't it? Remember how badly Bernie Sanders's supporters were treated? Remember how the Clinton people basically bullied them into silence? Remember when Wasserman Shultz was booed off the stage at the Florida delegation breakfast for being a cheat? Or when Donna Brazile was booed at the opening of the Democratic National Convention? That's probably why she wrote that book, admitting that the Clinton campaign took over the DNC. Wasn't Donna Brazile fired from CNN for colluding with Clinton? I think she was."
(From the above linked article)"

Collusion is not a Federal crime and means something different in legal terms than the way you are applying it.

You got nothing to rebut the above, so you want to deflect to an irrelevant reference to the legal meaning of the word collusion?

Ok... thanks for admitting that the efforts of some Russians had zero influence on the election.

As to your truthful comment about the meaning of collusion... I agree. So, maybe you can tell us why the MSM did nothing for 2+ years but go on and on about the criminal acts of the President and his campaign with respect to 'colluding with the Russians', and being 'Putins puppet'?



posted on Jul, 24 2019 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chr0naut
The investigation was never into 'Russian collusion'. It was Trump who fabricated that headline.

Yeah, sorry, but that is pure bullpuckey and you know it.

All the MSM did for 2 1/2+ years was harp on about collusion, and apparently it was ABC News that was first to use the term (not Trump).


Thanks for that. I have been trying to identify who used the term first and hadn't found any clear earlier example. Also, if you read the article, the first use was the Washington Examiner, not ABC News.




Irrelevant, as this letter wasn't made public until... when? About May of 2017?


The Washington Examiner first use of the term collusion was dated July 24, two months after the May 17th letter appointing the Special Counsel and defining the guidelines of the investigation he was to perform.

I'm not sure how the date of the appointment letter makes the terms of the investigation "irrelevant" in any way? You may as well have just said something like, 'irrelevant, because July 4th happens every year', or perhaps I am missing some subtext of what you were intending to say?




Yeah, and those silly stupid Americans, they saw one of these stupid memes, and oh my gawd! They were turned into brainwashed Russian proxy votes!

Give me a break. I saw a web page once showing many if not most of the crap these morons posted. Anyone who was influenced by that junk is a waste of space.


Yes, apparently the average American voter believed what they read online.

Here's a meta-page put together of the collected posts used by known Russian trolls. Click on each of the repositories to see what was posted.

A similar thing happened in the UK with Brexit. One small town with the highest 'leave' vote in the UK was interviewed by a journalist who asked why people voted to leave. The answers were that the people were concerned with the the immigrants coming from Turkey and they also said that the EU had done nothing for them. The truth was that there were few immigrants in that part of England, and no Turkish ones at all, and that the EU had spent tens of millions on a school and on a swimming pool and sports center to keep the town alive after the town's main industry shut down in the late '70's. The only place these people had seen anything negative about the EU or about Turkish immigrants was online in posts placed by known Russian trolls.

So, yes, people un-critically believe that what they read online is mostly true and it did/does affect votes.


Oh... and there is nothing to prove that these 'Russians' were in any way connected to the Russian government.


Yes, there is. Read the Mueller report.




I never said they didn't exist. I said they were irrelevant drivel, but more importantly, had zero influence on the election.


.

Yeah, yeah, and they also organized these:

July 9: Support Hillary. Save American Muslims Washington, D.C.
Nov. 12: Trump is NOT my President New York
Nov. 19: Charlotte Against Trump Charlotte, N.C.

So what?


So, they were spamming social media with literally hundreds of thousands of posts, were actively hacking against candidate targets, were running physical rallies across the country, and you think that it all had no effect?

If you are gullible enough to believe that, perhaps it is possible that other, less critical people, are even more likely to 'take the bait' of the trolls?




What is fake are the claims that Trump and/or anyone in his campaign had anything to do with it.


Except for those who were indicted and charged, like Rick Gates and Sam Patten. Oh, and Cohen has admitted he lied to Congress about talking with the Russian government about Trump tower in Moscow during the campaign. But no-one from the Trump campaign specifically instigated the Russian campaign of interference. They did, however, profit from it, undoubtedly. That fact was even mentioned in the Mueller report.




Facts in evidence.


What about the facts in evidence in the Mueller report?



Irrelevant. It was all garbage posts, and it had zero influence on the election, and it was not connected to the russian Government.


The IRA, the GRU and the FSB are all Russian government agencies. You talk about evidence and then reject actual evidence? The outcome of the election is clear evidence that it had an effect.


You know - all of the things that the MSM claimed for 2 1/2+ years. That Russia Hoax.


What Russian hoax? The Russians actually interfered in the 2016 elections using entirely un-moderated media to push out disinformation to hundreds of millions of Americans during the run-up to the elections. It is fact!



"First, there is zero hard evidence that the Russian government was in any way involved in meddling in our elections. And spare me the '17 Intelligence agencies agree' crap, because it is just that. They all agree, based on opinion and innuendo, nothing more.

But try this on:

... snipped as it was a quote from the above linked article ...

Collusion is not a Federal crime and means something different in legal terms than the way you are applying it.

You got nothing to rebut the above, so you want to deflect to an irrelevant reference to the legal meaning of the word collusion?

Ok... thanks for admitting that the efforts of some Russians had zero influence on the election.


What?

How does collusion not being an actual legal offense in this case even relate to Russian interference in the election?

I don't need to rebut the article because they entirely change the subject and instead are posing a hypothetical response based entirely on a quote which was an answer to a different question.

If the only interference in the 2016 elections had been the DNC Primary issues, where Sanders got bumped, then it would be relevant. But the piece was supposedly talking about Russian interference (at least from the title) which the article did not address at all.


As to your truthful comment about the meaning of collusion... I agree. So, maybe you can tell us why the MSM did nothing for 2+ years but go on and on about the criminal acts of the President and his campaign with respect to 'colluding with the Russians', and being 'Putins puppet'?


How is that relevant to either my post or the OP topic?

edit on 24/7/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
51
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join