It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

U.S. Court of Appeals will release almost 2Kpages of documents In Epstein case

page: 1
26
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+5 more 
posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 08:09 AM
link   
First off, I need to hop on my soap box for a quick second. I’m disappointed that this case isn’t receiving more interest here on ATS. The typical pro-trump vs anti-trump rhetoric floods the site while what could be the crown jewel of the conspiracy world is unfolding right before our eyes goes largely untouched. I’ve seen a few posts about it, but nothing that’s really sticking the way it should. This is the kind of case that justifies every conspiracy theorists belief that the powers that be who run this world are just as morally corrupt and disgusting as we’ve thought. But I digress...

Link


Likely within days, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit will release almost 2,000 pages of documents that could reveal sexual abuse by “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known prime minister, and other world leaders,” according to the three-judge panel's ruling.


Doesn’t matter who you are or what you believe in, each and every person who’s being accused in the Epstein case needs to be accounted for and put through the ringer. 2,000 pages may not paint the whole picture but it very well could shed some light on the depths of this case. The names being tied to this guy are jaw dropping. Of course, none of it means anyone is guilty but this guy, his plane, and his island have been discussed around here for years. And the dominos are starting to fall into place.

Clinton, Trump, Dershowitz, Zuckerman, Prince Andrew, Woody Allen, Ben Affleck, Larry Summers, Anthony Barr, Ken Starr, Stephen Hawking (?), Pinker, Schank, Weinstein, Alec Baldwin, Ted Kennedy, Elon Musk!!

The Names

I’m not insinuating they are all guilty of a crime, but they can all provide some form of information towards the ongoing they’ve been witness too. But it goes beyond the island and the Lolita Express.


One source who’s done business with Epstein told me that Epstein’s 21,000-square-foot townhouse on East 71st Street welcomed a steady stream of the Davos crowd in the past decade. The source said Bill Gates, Larry Summers, and Steve Bannon visited the house, which has been called one of the largest private residences in Manhattan. “Jeffrey collected people. That’s what he did,” the source said.


Even the Rothschilds are mentioned as a part of this case! I’m in till the end on this case. This could be the kind of case that changes the world. It could turn the elites upside down and shake out a lot more dirty secrets going on in the societal penthouse.




posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 08:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Assassin82

it's huge, but it almost seems as if it's going to be swept away again.
too many big folks. too big to fall. time will tell.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 08:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Assassin82

I really do hope that all this gets released.

Though I'm not gonna hold my breath. I'm half expecting some executive privilege or national security excuse gets used to reseal the documents.


edit on 18-7-2019 by grey580 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 09:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Assassin82

I agree that these documents are absolutely crucial to understanding everything "Epstein." And the fact that these docs dropped off everyone's radar with the arrest of Epstein is a huge fiery red flag in and of itself. And to add to your soapbox, I'm very disappointed and disheartened at how many people are salivating at every salacious and titilating rumor or speculation that comes along, with little interest in facts. And when it comes to facts, these documents are going to be a goldmine!

It's important to remember how this all played out... Two weeks before arresting Epstein, the Feds were in court arguing to keep all these documents sealed. They were also investigating Epstein again, so their interest in keeping the docs sealed may have been for the purposes of their current and ongoing investigation. Maybe. The judge in the civil case ordered the docs unsealed on the 3rd; Epstein was arrested on the 6th.

And there are still two "mystery" litigants involved that we are not hearing about. This is from March 2019: Mystery parties seek secrecy in Jeffrey Epstein-related suit

Just prior to a court-imposed deadline Tuesday, two anonymous individuals surfaced to object to the unsealing of a key lower-court ruling in the case, as well as various submissions by the parties.

Both people filed their complaints in the New York-based 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, which is overseeing the case. The two people said they could face unwarranted speculation and embarrassment if the court makes public records from the suit

And a new motion was filed on the 12th of July: Two Mysterious Individuals File Motion to Keep Epstein Records SEALED

A John or Jane Doe has tried filing an anonymous motion to keep Epstein’s records detailing his misdeeds sealed.

Both of the litigants filed their complaints in the New York-based Circuit Court that is overseeing the case against Epstein.

If these docs are released, we will have a much better picture of what's really been going on. But I fear that the Feds will request -- and be granted -- that they be sealed again for the purposes of their investigation and prosecution.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 09:28 AM
link   
Thanks for sharing.

ATS is so far from being an actual conspiracy page these days, Iv been following all the Epstein/pedogate stuff closely, just not here. At this point I’m not sure I’d even bother.

Heck the pizza thing is not even allowed to be talked about, and it’s being vindicated more and more as days go by. Maybe the Q threads are talkin about it, but it’s buried under neath AOC threads.

Keep paying attention, there has not yet been a dull day with this stuff, if you know where to look.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 09:42 AM
link   
I want to see them all go down. If that includes Trump, so be it.

The problem is, the left doesn't feel the same way. If any of theirs are implicated, well, sorry abused children but you don't deserve justice. Party before country, party before principles, party before stopping kids from getting raped. That's their mantra.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 10:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Assassin82

it's huge, but it almost seems as if it's going to be swept away again.
too many big folks. too big to fall. time will tell.


Yeah, that’s a common fear these days. Too many times what we know to be true get covered up and swept away. And when something does go from conspiracy to absolute truth we never really get a chance to capture it and enjoy the moment.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 10:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Assassin82

I agree that these documents are absolutely crucial to understanding everything "Epstein." And the fact that these docs dropped off everyone's radar with the arrest of Epstein is a huge fiery red flag in and of itself. And to add to your soapbox, I'm very disappointed and disheartened at how many people are salivating at every salacious and titilating rumor or speculation that comes along, with little interest in facts. And when it comes to facts, these documents are going to be a goldmine!

It's important to remember how this all played out... Two weeks before arresting Epstein, the Feds were in court arguing to keep all these documents sealed. They were also investigating Epstein again, so their interest in keeping the docs sealed may have been for the purposes of their current and ongoing investigation. Maybe. The judge in the civil case ordered the docs unsealed on the 3rd; Epstein was arrested on the 6th.

And there are still two "mystery" litigants involved that we are not hearing about. This is from March 2019: Mystery parties seek secrecy in Jeffrey Epstein-related suit

Just prior to a court-imposed deadline Tuesday, two anonymous individuals surfaced to object to the unsealing of a key lower-court ruling in the case, as well as various submissions by the parties.

Both people filed their complaints in the New York-based 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, which is overseeing the case. The two people said they could face unwarranted speculation and embarrassment if the court makes public records from the suit

And a new motion was filed on the 12th of July: Two Mysterious Individuals File Motion to Keep Epstein Records SEALED

A John or Jane Doe has tried filing an anonymous motion to keep Epstein’s records detailing his misdeeds sealed.

Both of the litigants filed their complaints in the New York-based Circuit Court that is overseeing the case against Epstein.

If these docs are released, we will have a much better picture of what's really been going on. But I fear that the Feds will request -- and be granted -- that they be sealed again for the purposes of their investigation and prosecution.


That’s some good stuff you added. I fear you may be right. Typically the feds get their way it seems. They probably will here as well.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 10:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: face23785
I want to see them all go down. If that includes Trump, so be it.

The problem is, the left doesn't feel the same way. If any of theirs are implicated, well, sorry abused children but you don't deserve justice. Party before country, party before principles, party before stopping kids from getting raped. That's their mantra.


I wonder if they’re willing to sacrifice the Clintons to further separate themselves from centrists and give the extreme left more of a platform to build off of.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 12:04 PM
link   
-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -8teen-

There has been a lot going on ATS with this. Q has been doing some amazing work with all this as well as others.

edit on 18-7-2019 by kwakakev because: fixed link



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: kwakakev
-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -8teen-

There has been a lot going on ATS with this. Q has been doing some amazing work with all this as well as others.


Personally, I lost any respect for the whole “Q” phenomenon months ago. At first it seemed legit, but that person or AI or whatever it is failed far to many times to maintain accuracy. I don’t knock anyone who still follows it, it’s just not my cup of tea anymore.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Assassin82

According to the story Elon Musk said he was invited to the island but he declined.
Dershwitz said he got a massage from a fifty year old woman named Olga.
People who know Jeffrey say he barely kept women over the age of 25 and Olga is a figment of Allens imagination.
Woody Allen is no surprise given he #ed his own adopted daughter.
And the story even mentions the Rothschilds to throw an extra bit of relish onto the smorgasbord.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 12:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Assassin82

According to the story Elon Musk said he was invited to the island but he declined.
Dershwitz said he got a massage from a fifty year old woman named Olga.
People who know Jeffrey say he barely kept women over the age of 25 and Olga is a figment of Allens imagination.
Woody Allen is no surprise given he #ed his own adopted daughter.
And the story even mentions the Rothschilds to throw an extra bit of relish onto the smorgasbord.

Yesterday, Ehud Barack admitted he's been there once, but he insists there wasn't a party going on.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

I haven't seen that to be true. They have mentioned Clinton over and over again. They mention the Queens second oldest son for crying out loud.
No one is safe and if they did this they should not be.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Assassin82

They asked in the MIchael Cohen case which has a doc drop today too, and the judge laughed at them and said No.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

I don't know who that is.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 01:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Former Isreali Prime Minister.

Are you sure you keep up with world events?
edit on 18-7-2019 by jadedANDcynical because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 01:06 PM
link   
I really hope this doesn't all get swept away.

One good thing though, he has been denied bail


Federal judge rules financier is a ‘danger to others’ while awaiting trial for the alleged sexual abuse of underage girls from 2002 to 2005


In citing he might be a flight risk


“Just this morning, the government became aware that in a locked safe in the defendant’s mansion there were piles of cash, dozens of diamonds, and a passport appearing to be issued from a foreign country with a photo of the defendant and a name on that passport that is not the defendant’s name”


It would be very interesting to see who the 2 mysterious individual were who tried to keep the files sealed and if this was the actual reason...


The two people said they could face unwarranted speculation and embarrassment if the court makes public records from the suit


Sounds to me from that statement they have something to hide!



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 01:11 PM
link   


It would be very interesting to see who the 2 mysterious individual were who tried to keep the files sealed and if this was the actual reason...


The two people said they could face unwarranted speculation and embarrassment if the court makes public records from the suit


Sounds to me from that statement they have something to hide!


"Unwarranted Speculation" and "embarrassment" almost make me think the two individuals are celebrities as opposed to politicians. Not sure why I think that because it could be anyone...but no, nobody cares about your "embarrassment" when child sex slaves right to some form of justice is at stake.



posted on Jul, 18 2019 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Assassin82

My other thought was that maybe those 2 don't have something to hide..... but the person or group who paid them to attempt to keep Epstein’s records sealed do!!




top topics



 
26
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join