reply to post by fortean
The Klan began as a group to fight the northern aggression, as it was called back then. They kept a secretive profile to discover Yankee sympathizers
who would wish to organize unwarranted taxation on real-estate (land). During the original formation of the Klan, in Pulaski, TN, there was no racist
agenda, but that did come later at the second resurrection of the Klan at post civil war.
The cross, if I remember my history correctly, was burned in the yard of a Yankee sympathizer to denote his identity. Whether or not a person was
really a trader to the south, the stigma was established with the cross and the person was from that time forward treated as such.
Over the years, the Klan has been disbanded and outlawed only to re-emerge at a later time. They often employed a renaming tactic to circumvent the
legal disbandment status.
Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Invisible Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Imperial Knights, Imperial, Invisible Knights, etc.
Now a-days they claim to no longer be an anti race group, but a white heritage preservation group, which is complete and utter non-sense.
Having lived in the south, in Decatur, Al, I can assure everyone that they are still the same racist collective of inbreeds that has existed since the
post civil war inception of the group’s namesake. They generally recruit white high school drop outs or societies rejects and pump them full of BS,
blaming their collective woes on everyone who is not white.
Are some of them of Scottish decent, sadly, some are, but that lineage is nothing more than happenstance as the majority of their decree is attuned to
German Nazi propaganda.