Appeals Court Orders Dismissal Of Emoluments Lawsuit Against Trump

It looks like Trump beat another lawsuit, this one alleging “that profits earned by his Washington hotel while he is in office violate the Constitution.”

The judges suggest the lawsuit might be politically motivated.

“The District and Maryland’s interest in enforcing the Emoluments Clauses is so attenuated and abstract that their prosecution of this case readily provokes the question of whether this action against the President is an appropriate use of the courts,” the panel wrote in its decision.

archive.is...

Previous ATS discussion

Trump’s response:

Word just out that I won a big part of the Deep State and Democrat induced Witch Hunt. Unanimous decision in my favor from The United States Court of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit on the ridiculous Emoluments Case. I don’t make money, but lose a fortune for the honor of.....

...serving and doing a great job as your President (including accepting Zero salary!).

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Winning 🥇 😁

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Yea, that lawsuit was never going to go anywhere.

The logic behind it was so twisted that if you bought into the idea, 6 of our first 7 Presidents broke it.

Most of those actually helped write the clause...

Can’t wait to see what the leftist come up with next.

originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
Can’t wait to see what the leftist come up with next.

I heard Trump had sex and pissed on a Russian girl who wasn't old enough, while he was grabbing other women by their vertical smile. Or has that one already been done?

a reply to: network dude
yea that one is played out. Maybe they will focus on his KFC and then allude that he directly is responsible for animal cruelty because of how mass produced chickens are treated at the farms??

Maybe he stepped on a crack, and broke his mama's back?

I love how they tried to claim that people staying at Trump's hotel was an emolument, while simultaneously ignoring the huge donations made to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary was SoS (and huge "speaking fees" paid to her husband), often made by people & companies who then received favorable rulings from the State Department.

Yeah, I don't recall any of these "emolument" people getting upset about that. But the fact Trump's name is attached to a hotel is somehow a major constitutional crisis.

originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
Can’t wait to see what the leftist come up with next.

They're busy accusing Trump of raping little girls with Epstein.

originally posted by: projectvxn

originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
Can’t wait to see what the leftist come up with next.

They busy accusing Trump of raping little girls with Epstein.

he knew the guy, so it's obvious he was part of his rape gang. Pft, dood, do you even conspiracy?

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Beat another? Thats one...

a reply to: Sillyolme

We win everyday here, try joining us in reality.

HONK HONK

Another faceplant by the far left Democrats.

Line up the next failure!

originally posted by: projectvxn

originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
Can’t wait to see what the leftist come up with next.

They busy accusing Trump of raping little girls with Epstein.

Oh yeah I almost forgot about that one, there all starting to blend together I guess.

a reply to: PurpleFox

We win everyday here, try joining us in reality. HONK HONK

How did you do at the supreme court with the citizenship question? HONK HONK lol...

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

There goes another 'silly' prediction down the drain.

ETA: Here is a classic, AOC gives top 3 reasons to impeach Trump, well cant really come up with 3, but "There's just so many reasons, umm...umm..."
Guess what the #1 reason was? Emoluments! BWAHAHAHA Starts at 1:30.

This interview must have been aired on msnBS, most trusted source of the Delusional.

#Trump2020

a reply to: stosh64

You made an error... the correct network is MSDNC

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: stosh64

You made an error... the correct network is MSDNC

a reply to: tinner07

www.cnbc.com...

A high-ranking Justice Department official is telling a federal judge that the Trump administration has not abandoned efforts to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, even as the U.S. Census Bureau has started the process of printing the questionnaire without the controversial query. Assistant Attorney General Joseph Hunt says “there may be a legally available path” under last week’s Supreme Court decision that blocked the question, at least temporarily. Hunt made his comments on a conference call with U.S. District Judge George Hazel Wednesday afternoon, following a tweet from President Donald Trump insisting that efforts to include the citizenship question would proceed.

www.npr.org...

www.nytimes.com...

so hes gonna do it any ways just by different means

Only really silly people ever thought this law suit was anything but a hail mary pass with 1 second on the clock by the left .... in a game they were already losing by more than 8 points.

a reply to: tinner07

It is not over yet and it may be on the census