The true origins of the Seth Rich conspiracy theory. A Yahoo News investigation.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: Liquesence

This still doesn't explain who killed him and why.

You ever live in Washington DC? A crime-ridden hell hole where you have prostitutes selling their wares right near the White House.

When I lived there, every day in the Washington post they’d have a whole section of the numerous crimes in the city…murders, rapes, robberies, drug shootings, etc.

One of my best friends’ girlfriend was mysteriously murdered in the city and to this day it hasn’t been solved. She was shot in the head.

One thing we do know…

Hillary Clinton didn’t do it.

a reply to: Liquesence


Your point is kind of moot IMO,,, Doesn't matter if everything Dossier was found to be true...

What matters is did they properly vet the info before going to the FISA court.

This was very early in the game, I don't personally believe they would have had the time to do that....properly verifying that would have taken months, if not years.

Taking the word of someone who had a monetary investment and a personal hatred of Trump should have set off warning bells.

originally posted by: Liquesence
Trolls will be trolls.

This is exactly the MO, and it's here and it's real, and exactly what foreign operatives have done and are doing.

Attack and attempt to discredit anything to further the agenda.

By far the most ironic post in this thread.

How about we respect the rights of others to express different opinions instead of trying to discourage them from posting by calling them trolls?

a reply to: Willtell

One thing we do know… 

Hillary Clinton didn’t do it. 

We don't know that at all.

You're pulling facts out of your arse.

a reply to: Sillyolme

He fights back they decide he's too much boom your dead someone else yells and the attempted robber now murderer run away without getting anything

Yeah, your theory holds as much weight as the Clinton hit theory.

Let's not pretend that we know all the facts eh?

I don’t know why people are so naive of how corrupt governments get with elections..Covering up sex slavery rings...I do believe Seth Rich murder is the biggest story of all the fake journalism going on.No longer any credibility left with journalism.Guess that is because of the world is so corrupt if you don’t know what you are doing you will end up dead.

Update 7.22.2019

On video, Julian Assange discloses that he got the DNC e-mails from Seth Rich. Not from Russian Hackers.

Source: theconservativetreehouse.com... rom-seth-rich-not-a-russian-hack/

a reply to: carewemust

Now the cat is out... time to work backwards and expose what media were in on the false narrative. Make the house of cards tumble...

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

What facts would they be?
If you think you have facts that prove this was anything other than a failed robbery in an area were seven robberies of exactly the same kind on exactly the same corner had occurred over the six months previous to the Rich robbery/ murder who were described as two men with guns demanding money then please enlighten us.
Because the DC police would love to hear from you.

a reply to: carewemust

He lied. Oh my say it ain't so.

Consider that he never revealed any sources prior to this and he never revealed any sources after this and he got the emails before Rich was murdered and it tells quite a different story.

a reply to: carewemust

Hey CWM
All the details of how the Russians did this from the initial onslaught of memes and fake ads and fake stories to the hacking of the DNC are all laid out in just a few pages in part one of the Mueller report. You could get through it in about a half hour. You might try it.

a reply to: Sillyolme

is that the same report the judge in the concord case crapped on recently?
www.washingtontimes.com...

A federal judge has chastised former special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General William P. Barr for stating that the Russian government was behind election year social media trolling when there is no evidence presented by prosecutors.

your running out of bs lies to spread
no more stormy
no more hotti avenotti
no more mah rushia

the walls are closing in and trump is still in the white house
you have your rep green to fall back on, at least he is a man of his word, tho not many of your dems will back him

a reply to: Sillyolme

on the flip side, so far as anyone knows this is the first time a leaker has been killed

Do you have proof otherwise, no, of course not. You aren't credible, nor are your sources. (your past catching up with you)

Assange would know better than you or yahoo, he lied because??????????

wikileaks only has crediblity as currency, why would it sell it's self short??

what happens if assange proves his claim?

a reply to: carewemust

So Julian says it and the far right CTH says it, so it must be true.

You believe Assange, the CTH, and far right blogs over everything else?

That's the problem

a reply to: thedigirati

Do you have proof otherwise, no, of course not. You aren't credible, nor are your sources. (your past catching up with you)

Do you have proof?

Are you credible?

You aren't, nor are yours. Just conspiracy theories.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: carewemust

So Julian says it and the far right CTH says it, so it must be true.

You believe Assange, the CTH, and far right blogs over everything else?

That's the problem

That's First Person evidence. Until Assange is proven a liar, his first person account is valid.

A few months prior to the 2020 election, the "Rich" story will be proven and the DNC "Russian" hack will be proven false.

😎🎱😎

Your debunking has been debunked. Assange told news reporter Ellen Ratner that Seth Rich was the DNC leaker. The parents didn't want this information out because Seth's brother also was a leaker and they wanted to protect him.

thewashingtonstandard.com...

The Russian seed story is as fake as can be.

originally posted by: SourGrapes

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: carewemust

So Julian says it and the far right CTH says it, so it must be true.

You believe Assange, the CTH, and far right blogs over everything else?

That's the problem

That's First Person evidence. Until Assange is proven a liar, his first person account is valid.

That's not "evidence."