He said he was a terrific guy in 2002. Epstein wasn't charged with any crimes until 2005. Trump also says "he's a terrific guy" about most people.
Especially ones he doesn't know well. Why do you think trump knew about epstein being a pedo? I mean, why would he approve his membership at
mar-a-lago only to revoke it on those grounds later?
The timeline is important because relationships evolve over time.
In 2009 the "only person" to help the prosecution try to nail epstein was trump (according to the prosecutor). chew on that for a while.
Go to 5:00 for the part about trump if you only want to see that part.
Epstein was a guest of someone else at Mar A Largo. I suppose my take on it is, Trump added that one quip about Epstein liking younger girls back in
'02 and then booted him out of 'Largo in '07 for trying to fool around with an underage kid, it certainly could be entirely coincidence, I just don't
get why Trump, or anyone really, would feel the need to add that one line about him liking younger women.
It's like the drunk guy you used to see around campus at everyone's party, stumbling over himself and acting like an idiot; "Oh yeah, I know that guy,
he's alright. Seen him around a bunch, been to a few parties with him. He gets a little too out of hand at times, but good guy." then that guy shows
up at your house, sh!tfaced and pisses on your carpet and without a second thought you're kicking him out on his ass because you don't want that crap
going on in your house.
I think I've read pretty much everything available regarding this whole mess and I'd say the Clintons have a hell of a lot more to be concerned about
than Trump does. It's just odd to me that this guy was banging dozens of underage girls for years and it went that far under the radar? I don't mean
just for Trump, I mean for anyone who was around the guy more than several times or close enough to him to hitch rides on his jet or hang out at his
In the end, I want every piece of sh!t who had knowledge of this to go down as an accomplice, because if you aren't bringing light to a situation like
that while knowing what was going on, that's exactly what you are. So when I question Trump's knowledge of it, it's not an attack on his job as a
president or anything regarding the guy in the last 12 years, but these 1%'s live like there are zero rules to life and will look out for each other
so they can keep a favor in their pocket for future use.
Grambler, I know what you're saying regarding having proof. I just have a hard time believing this guy was as active as he was and only a couple
people knew about it. Unfortunately, this is a situation I have more experience in than I wish I did. My aunt was abusing me for a year straight when
I was 5-6, my mom knew, my grandmother and grandfather knew, their friends knew....and the only thing done about it was we weren't allowed to sleep
with the door shut anymore. The fact that nothing was done about it messed me up so much more than the actual abuse did, so maybe I get a bit
more sensitive in these discussions than most. I'm not coming from an anti-Trump stance, I'm coming from an anti-kid-toucher stance. I had 2
stepsisters who were raped by their own father and it was swept under the rug to not disrupt the already dysfunctional family. My cousin was touched
by a neighbor and our parents just told us not to play by his house anymore.
This was all back in the 80's and it was certainly a different time back then. Wrong regardless, but I think there was more reluctance to bring abuse
to light as to not disrupt "normal" life. The small cities and towns I lived in were already depressing and hopeless, I think everyone was just doing
what they could to make ends meet while having plenty of money for beer and smokes, upsetting that already sh!tty existence was more than most of the
simple minds could handle.
I mentioned this in another thread but should also be posted here.
You really need to ask why would Epstein come back to the states with an impending release of court docs coming up. That is a very risky move unless
he is just complete idiot, which he is not. He is a sicko but pretty smart also.
So I contend that he needed to come back to his NY residence to destroy those files. I would also contend that those files would have been destroyed
long ago except that they are extremely valuable blackmail material core to his business, lifestyle and income. Without those files, he is just
another lowlife pedo. With them, he can still exert control and power. He could not trust anyone else to dispose of them as they are way too
damaging and valuable.
He surely has multiple copies. Would expect this to be at his NM property as well. Probably more copies in a non-extradition country also. Which
could possibly be tracked down through flight logs maybe. One of his empty plane trips. He would not want associates to know where that set of
copies was, so it would be a solo trip he took, that should narrow things down a bit.
The point is, there should be A LOT of names taken down with this case. Not just 2,3,5 but his whole freaking list of blackmailed people. So if that
does not happen, you will know that only the illusion of justice was served and not a full plate of pain.
I am highly sceptical this will go beyond Epstein, I think they are more concerned with appearance and trying to protect the sick, corrupt DS status
quo than they are in dealing out true justice. We shall see.
Epstein for sure has a deadman switch. You wouldn't blackmail rich and powerful people without one.
If investigators/prosecutors don't control that switch, Epstein still has a lot of power even in jail.
Until prosecutors get control of that switch, they can't be sure who all Epstein has control over. And does Epstein only use this for his own benefit
or does he sell this control to others?? Guy is rich as heck and smart, I am pretty sure he also got paid to get things done. Who paid him? Who
paid him for influence?
originally posted by: canuckster
The biggest news story this year, and it's not on its front page, this site is more liberal Democrat filtered garbage, mods delete my account, this
site is the worst kind of compromised bull#
Happens every time a truly newsworthy conspiracy comes to light here. Notice how a bunch of mundane boring threads get posted on during that time?
Disinformation agents post on those threads adding no value to thread to distract.
You can help work against this by posting on the important threads, add value to them and keep them up near top on recent posts.
I suppose my take on it is, Trump added that one quip about Epstein liking younger girls back in '02 and then booted him out of 'Largo in '07 for
trying to fool around with an underage kid, it certainly could be entirely coincidence, I just don't get why Trump, or anyone really, would feel the
need to add that one line about him liking younger women.
My thoughts on it is that liking younger girls, to a couple of 40-50 year old bachelors (trump may have been recently married to melania, idk) is not
any type of admission of liking underage girls. In fact, is it not stereotypical for guys in their mid forties to leave their wives/girlfriends of
similar age and start dating mid 20 somethings?
I just think the idea that we should be focusing on trump's ties to epstein because one time he said a nice sentence about the man is absurd. If it
comes out that trump is a kid diddler, beyond reasonable doubt, by all means he should rot in jail. I'm just very suspect of this whole situation.
From the players to the actual unfolding of events, it's coming out like it's scripted.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.