When people talk about and try to define 'conspiracy theory' or 'theorists' , are they using the correct technical terms , semantics, language and
rhetoric , to justify the use of the nouns for the processes people who may be called that , might undergo ?
Might they not better be called 'reverse engineers ' , or 'scientific investigators' or 'intelligence analysts' ? Specifically covering the field of
'conspiracy' , which in itself is a proper term .
To call out 'conspiracy theorists' as derogatory term is unfair at best , severely ignorant at worst . It often happens . But they , they're ilk ,
call 'them' who you like , for it's us , do attempt to explain life in the certain terms we know can well cover the actual processes in the occurence
of certain events . 'Conspiracy to murder ' for example is in fact something people can be and have been tried for committing in a court of law and
serve sentences for . Does that then make a Judge a conspiracy theorist of sorts , and the lawyers ? Yes . Conspiracies , their theorists , are
there to try and solve and then prove , a case . But then they need to speculate , to accumulate , and the facts that count are what 's gathered .
It's the reality which is sought ... or the realities .
Now , co-operation , is like conspiracy . Helping each other , say a running a business to get sales , or getting domestic jobs done , is a conspiracy
of sorts , with a purpose , a play of events , often an end result , and there are predictable outcomes , players will work in the ways you might
expect them to . There may be directors and underscores , histories and subplots , and unknown unknowns may rear up . There's means motives ,
opportunities , but then there's the unpredicability of the future , and the ' what they would do's of organised operations .
When watching a film , we might call out to the actors , or our friends , at points they need to decide their next move correctly . With superheros it
predictable though , isn;t it ? Thats a side note . The point is , whther its cooperation or conspiracy is often decided on whether it's illegal of
legal activity , nefarious and dark , or quite openly predictable . We should be getting by now that it's a science of facts whichever is the case ,
and that to degrade those who might be labelled with the term ' conspiracy theorist ' , is very stupid . Careful who you're ripping off .
That said , and passing by the fact that the name gets applied to randoms who might spout off facts they think they know without heed to existence of
lateral reasoning , what other terms would people preferred to be named by ? I'd thought of a good definition for shared areas of interest which is
much improved but can't remember it , as of yet. Something about giving definition to the hidden ...
Continuity programmes carried out to perpetuate secrecy sometimes come to the fore in the public eye or via private sources .
Eg the guy who is the landlord of this property is in on the deal , 3 open source proofs later from a series of unfolding events , etc
edit on 6-7-2019 by DoctorBluechip because: (no reason given)
edit on 6-7-2019 by DoctorBluechip because: (no reason