It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

High Court Finds Tommy Robinson guilty of contempt of court over Facebook broadcast

page: 52
14
<< 49  50  51    53  54  55 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Fair enough 15 years ago he was in the BNP and left it because he found out there were many racists in it.
Not really strong evidence of being racist is it?


No, he was 20. It was 15 years ago. He didn’t join and stay because the BNP was racist, he left because the BNP was racist.


And how does someone manage to join the BNP without knowing they are racist?


Like he said, they were the only ones standing up to Islamic extremism.


Which is bollocks.

Also suggested he did know they were racist and just didn't care.

What a guy.


Ok so in 2004 when tommy joined the bnp, which other groups were standing up against these Muslim gangs?

Not the police, they allowed the gangs to go and went after anyone who tried to retaliate



Yes the police did deal with gangs of all descriptions. your total ignorance of the UK and counter factual history is a pathetic attempt to justify his membership of an overly racist and violent organisation.




posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: jd0Fengland

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: oldcarpy


That's priceless. And you believe him?!!!!!!!

the question isnt whether you believe him the question is assuming that is true whether you can then call him a racist.
when you admit that TR having black or non white friends demonstrates he is not racist we can go and look at whether such friends exist. Okay?
So is having such friends proof he is not racist?


Having black or non white friends does not mean someone isn't racist.

but criticising a religion proves that someone is?


Membership of racist organisations and racist comments prove he is.



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:06 AM
link   



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Fair enough 15 years ago he was in the BNP and left it because he found out there were many racists in it.
Not really strong evidence of being racist is it?


No, he was 20. It was 15 years ago. He didn’t join and stay because the BNP was racist, he left because the BNP was racist.


And how does someone manage to join the BNP without knowing they are racist?


Like he said, they were the only ones standing up to Islamic extremism.


Which is bollocks.

Also suggested he did know they were racist and just didn't care.

What a guy.


Ok so in 2004 when tommy joined the bnp, which other groups were standing up against these Muslim gangs?

Not the police, they allowed the gangs to go and went after anyone who tried to retaliate



Yes the police did deal with gangs of all descriptions. your total ignorance of the UK and counter factual history is a pathetic attempt to justify his membership of an overly racist and violent organisation.


Do I need to again post the reports showing police knew these gangs were raping little girls for three decades?

Are you claiming the girls who were raped and said the police did nothing except treat them like criminals are wrong?



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Fair enough 15 years ago he was in the BNP and left it because he found out there were many racists in it.
Not really strong evidence of being racist is it?


No, he was 20. It was 15 years ago. He didn’t join and stay because the BNP was racist, he left because the BNP was racist.


And how does someone manage to join the BNP without knowing they are racist?


Like he said, they were the only ones standing up to Islamic extremism.


Which is bollocks.

Also suggested he did know they were racist and just didn't care.

What a guy.


Big deal. People still join the Labor party.


Does that even make sense in your head.



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

People can read my posts in this thread and yours and make up their own minds.

Quite the little keyboard warrior, aren't you?

Do you never tire of sterile, forensic and circular argument? I do.



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: jd0Fengland

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: oldcarpy


That's priceless. And you believe him?!!!!!!!

the question isnt whether you believe him the question is assuming that is true whether you can then call him a racist.
when you admit that TR having black or non white friends demonstrates he is not racist we can go and look at whether such friends exist. Okay?
So is having such friends proof he is not racist?


Having black or non white friends does not mean someone isn't racist.

but criticising a religion proves that someone is?


Membership of racist organisations and racist comments prove he is.



Nope! Ratzinger was a member of Hitler Youth for a week. every youth in Germany was. It is understandable in a culture where you want to express nationalism you might Join the Nationalist Party. If he was busy beating up black people at the time then yes but I dont know what his activities were. I believe he left because he arrived at a meeting with some friends and they would not let the friends in because they were black.



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Fair enough 15 years ago he was in the BNP and left it because he found out there were many racists in it.
Not really strong evidence of being racist is it?


No, he was 20. It was 15 years ago. He didn’t join and stay because the BNP was racist, he left because the BNP was racist.


And how does someone manage to join the BNP without knowing they are racist?


Like he said, they were the only ones standing up to Islamic extremism.


Which is bollocks.

Also suggested he did know they were racist and just didn't care.

What a guy.


Ok so in 2004 when tommy joined the bnp, which other groups were standing up against these Muslim gangs?

Not the police, they allowed the gangs to go and went after anyone who tried to retaliate



Yes the police did deal with gangs of all descriptions. your total ignorance of the UK and counter factual history is a pathetic attempt to justify his membership of an overly racist and violent organisation.


Do I need to again post the reports showing police knew these gangs were raping little girls for three decades?

Are you claiming the girls who were raped and said the police did nothing except treat them like criminals are wrong?



See you have gone back to you old tactics of trying to claim those who disagree with you don't care about or don't believe the victims. You really are pathetic.

Out of interest how close to Rotherham was Robinson when he joined the BNP.



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: jd0Fengland

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: oldcarpy


That's priceless. And you believe him?!!!!!!!

the question isnt whether you believe him the question is assuming that is true whether you can then call him a racist.
when you admit that TR having black or non white friends demonstrates he is not racist we can go and look at whether such friends exist. Okay?
So is having such friends proof he is not racist?


Having black or non white friends does not mean someone isn't racist.

but criticising a religion proves that someone is?


Membership of racist organisations and racist comments prove he is.


Not sure about proof, but I have found that these are usually pretty accurate indicators.



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Fair enough 15 years ago he was in the BNP and left it because he found out there were many racists in it.
Not really strong evidence of being racist is it?


No, he was 20. It was 15 years ago. He didn’t join and stay because the BNP was racist, he left because the BNP was racist.


And how does someone manage to join the BNP without knowing they are racist?


Like he said, they were the only ones standing up to Islamic extremism.


Which is bollocks.

Also suggested he did know they were racist and just didn't care.

What a guy.


Big deal. People still join the Labor party.


Does that even make sense in your head.


I thought anti-semitism was a problem in the Labour Party. Do you assume every member of the Labour Party is an anti-Semite?



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: bartconnolly

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: jd0Fengland

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: oldcarpy


That's priceless. And you believe him?!!!!!!!

the question isnt whether you believe him the question is assuming that is true whether you can then call him a racist.
when you admit that TR having black or non white friends demonstrates he is not racist we can go and look at whether such friends exist. Okay?
So is having such friends proof he is not racist?


Having black or non white friends does not mean someone isn't racist.

but criticising a religion proves that someone is?


Membership of racist organisations and racist comments prove he is.



Nope! Ratzinger was a member of Hitler Youth for a week. every youth in Germany was. It is understandable in a culture where you want to express nationalism you might Join the Nationalist Party. If he was busy beating up black people at the time then yes but I dont know what his activities were. I believe he left because he arrived at a meeting with some friends and they would not let the friends in because they were black.


Hitter youth was a mass membership group for children under the NAZI regime.

Robinson joined a fringe racist party as an adult.

Does that sound even remotely comparable to you.
edit on 9-7-2019 by ScepticScot because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: Grambler

People can read my posts in this thread and yours and make up their own minds.

Quite the little keyboard warrior, aren't you?

Do you never tire of sterile, forensic and circular argument? I do.


I never get tired of pointing out liars online who I st others instead of admitting their lie

You said you never said police weren’t complicit

Then you admitted that you said police weren’t complicit

But you still claim despite this that your claim you never said it is true

Hahahhahahahahaha!

One of the funniest defenses for a lie I have ever heard



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Fair enough 15 years ago he was in the BNP and left it because he found out there were many racists in it.
Not really strong evidence of being racist is it?

top notch analogy
No, he was 20. It was 15 years ago. He didn’t join and stay because the BNP was racist, he left because the BNP was racist.


And how does someone manage to join the BNP without knowing they are racist?


Like he said, they were the only ones standing up to Islamic extremism.


Which is bollocks.

Also suggested he did know they were racist and just didn't care.

What a guy.


Big deal. People still join the Labor party.


Does that even make sense in your head.


I thought anti-semitism was a problem in the Labour Party. Do you assume every member of the Labour Party is an anti-Semite?
top notch analogy
edit on 9-7-2019 by jd0Fengland because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Fair enough 15 years ago he was in the BNP and left it because he found out there were many racists in it.
Not really strong evidence of being racist is it?


No, he was 20. It was 15 years ago. He didn’t join and stay because the BNP was racist, he left because the BNP was racist.


And how does someone manage to join the BNP without knowing they are racist?


Like he said, they were the only ones standing up to Islamic extremism.


Which is bollocks.

Also suggested he did know they were racist and just didn't care.

What a guy.


Big deal. People still join the Labor party.


Does that even make sense in your head.


I thought anti-semitism was a problem in the Labour Party. Do you assume every member of the Labour Party is an anti-Semite?


Does the Labour party ban Jews from joining?

Does it have anti Jewish policies in its constitution?

Pretty much organisations have racist members.

Racist organisations only have racist members



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:15 AM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot

Rotherham? Is that the only place where this was happening?

So just to be clear, if it comes out that there were grooming gangs in Luton, you will accept that the people of Luton were ignored and let down by the police?

Meanwhile tommy has given proof of incidents that occurred iuton, including black families having their houses smashed by Muslim gangs to be forced to leave, a Jewish man attacked routinely for his faith, and police did almost nothing



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Fair enough 15 years ago he was in the BNP and left it because he found out there were many racists in it.
Not really strong evidence of being racist is it?


No, he was 20. It was 15 years ago. He didn’t join and stay because the BNP was racist, he left because the BNP was racist.


And how does someone manage to join the BNP without knowing they are racist?


Like he said, they were the only ones standing up to Islamic extremism.


Which is bollocks.

Also suggested he did know they were racist and just didn't care.

What a guy.


Ok so in 2004 when tommy joined the bnp, which other groups were standing up against these Muslim gangs?

Not the police, they allowed the gangs to go and went after anyone who tried to retaliate



Yes the police did deal with gangs of all descriptions. your total ignorance of the UK and counter factual history is a pathetic attempt to justify his membership of an overly racist and violent organisation.


Do I need to again post the reports showing police knew these gangs were raping little girls for three decades?

Are you claiming the girls who were raped and said the police did nothing except treat them like criminals are wrong?



See you have gone back to you old tactics of trying to claim those who disagree with you don't care about or don't believe the victims. You really are pathetic.

Out of interest how close to Rotherham was Robinson when he joined the BNP.

gone back to ...trying to claim those who disagree with you don't care about or don't believe the victims.????
I think it is quite clear that what he was doing was challenging the denial of police complicity by another poster. But literally NONE of the posters have posted ANYTHING in this discussion or anywhere else now or in the past about Islamic rape gangs not being acted on. so if you can barly post about the victims and spend most of your time posting about TR who is complaining that the gangs were not tackled and STILL people wonht address the islamic issue of rape gang membership then YES that demonstrates you care less about the victims then you do about Islam being mentioned as connected to the rape gangs.



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

T & C's mean that I am unable to provide you with the response you deserve so, I will bite my tongue. Nice try, though.



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:20 AM
link   
my god!

over 1000 posts over this scum-bag getting what he deserves....

Honestly both sides of this debate need a slap. On the one hand the people defending him clearly don't understand the legal system in England and its also quite apparent that quite a few of them sympathise with wee Stevie. These people are never going to admit that Stevie has done wrong, so why is anyone bothering to debate them. It is akin to trying to convince a flat earther that the word is a sphere, its pointless a total waist of my time and to be quite honest their time.

The petty endeavour of everyone in this thread just wanting to get that last victory post is pathetic.

Guess what "Tommy Robinson" is a scumbag criminal who has been found guilty of contempt of court, good, give him he maximum sentence. Doesn't matter what his supporters are going to say, let them cry, let them riot or do whatever they want to do but it doesn't change that "Tommy" is just a thug who is getting what he deserves.

And yes...he is a racist.
edit on 9-7-2019 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: bartconnolly
a reply to: oldcarpy


That's priceless. And you believe him?!!!!!!!

the question isnt whether you believe him the question is assuming that is true whether you can then call him a racist.
when you admit that TR having black or non white friends demonstrates he is not racist we can go and look at whether such friends exist. Okay?
So is having such friends proof he is not racist?


Having black or non white friends does not mean someone isn't racist.


So what is the point of doubting it is true when even if it was true you would not accepot it as evidence TR is not racist?
Just what would you accept ( they you also accept of others) which would convince you he is not racist?



posted on Jul, 9 2019 @ 10:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: Grambler

T & C's mean that I am unable to provide you with the response you deserve so, I will bite my tongue. Nice try, though.


Nice try with what?

Pointing out your lie?

I’m sorry that showing your obvious lie when you claimed you never said police weren’t complicit, only to minutes later say yes I did say police weren’t complicit, has upset you

Often times pointing out when someone is lying will hurt their feelings, but it’s better in the long run for the liar to be called out, so that hopefully they will not blatantly lie in the future
edit on 9-7-2019 by Grambler because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 49  50  51    53  54  55 >>

log in

join