High Court Finds Tommy Robinson guilty of contempt of court over Facebook broadcast

a reply to: Grambler

What i find strange is your support for know racist scum.

a reply to: andy06shake

You have merely cited tommy hatred of Islam as his racism

A hatred you have for Christianity but do not consider racist

Your an internet tough guy who pretends you have super server connections to take out child rapist, but will only do it if your child is raped

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Grambler

What i find strange is your support form know racist scum.

And I find your support for a legal system that allows for the rape of children, covered it up and treated the children like criminals to be strange

a reply to: Grambler

Im just me.

Least I'm not a racist apologist twat that doesn't know his arse from his elbow where Mr Robinson concerned.

a reply to: Grambler

A legal system you ken smeg about.

I think you may find America is rather well known for treating rather a few brown immigrant children like criminals.

a reply to: andy06shake

you are backpedaling! You claimed pre teens in your initial reply ( which exists in sharia)
But now you are extending it to "under 18"
Im sure some 17 and sixteen year olds marry in the US. But Islam has six to nine. Even you initially said 11 but you have given no evidence of that in the US.
this is the whole issue here. there is a culture that condones sex between adults and children and no one is talking about it

a reply to: bartconnolly

I should not let it worry you. The court must be allowed to conduct its affairs without interference. Robinson was in contempt. Is there anything of the process and the outcome you disagree with? Robinson was under a suspended sentence at the time and has not protested his innocence.

Anyway, you say "gagging order". In fact it's a reporting restriction during a trial. Nice language. Is that the term going around YouTube at the mo?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Grambler

Im just me.

Least I'm not a racist apologist twat that doesn't know his arse from his elbow where Mr Robinson concerned.

Nope your an apologist for corruption that allowed children to be raped

And you claim you could stop the rapist, but don’t feel like it because you family wasn’t affected

Disgusting

a reply to: andy06shake

Where is you evidence christianity is based on Sun god worship?

a reply to: andy06shake

Please keep your virtue signaling about us detentions for illegals to those threads

Yeah there was legal system injustice in the us

People like malcolm x (who was a criminal) pointed that out

I may have disagreed with some of his more extreme comments and methods, but I understand why he was so angry and did the things he did

You would be the guy calling him a racist for complaining about white oriole and demanding he be locked up

a reply to: Grambler

Where have i claimed i could stop a rapist?

I could find a nasty bastard that ever attempted to touch one of my kids, that would be a mission.

Disgusting?

Aye, racist apologists, i tend to agree.

a reply to: paraphi

But this is my point

Show me in the 1981 contempt of court act that tommy was found guilty of where it says it only applies if you film on court steps

My reading of it, and apparently the uk attorney general quoted in the op is that any social media post about someone before their trial is over is possible contempt

a reply to: Grambler

You really dont have a scooby doo.

"Wasps" up with ya? x

a reply to: paraphi

Anyway, you say "gagging order". In fact it's a reporting restriction during a trial.

WRONG!
Im not referring to the restrictions on the trial of the gang of muslims child rapists. Im referring to the reporting oin the incarceration of robinson . what was said about Tommy Robinson ( which has NOTHING to do with any evidence fr jury of the rapists) or how he was getting on in jail was not reported because it had a separate gag order. That order was lifted but even then the Press NEVER REPORTED Marsdens remarks.

a reply to: andy06shake

Yes you claimed you could find and deal with the entire group that hurt your daughter (magically without using the group they belong to to find them)

So go for it big guy

These grooming gangs still exist

Only a selfish heartless scumbag that is one of the lowest people in the world would allow child rapists they had the power to stop to continue raping kids so long as they don’t rape your kid

a reply to: Grambler

Tommy

Tommy

What's the score?

Coz Gramblers not quite sure anymore.

So now I'm a selfish heartless scumbag???

Aye, you're right its all my fault. LoL

What a thud you are today! x

a reply to: Grambler

Big im only 5"9

That's not big, just about average really for the UK. LoL

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Grambler

Big im only 5"10

That's not big, just about average really for the UK. LoL

That counts as a giant in glasgow.

a reply to: andy06shake

Can you find the rapists or not?

You said you can

So why won’t you?

I know as you have done the whole thread, you just ignore every time I prove you make a ridiculous claim

Like how you can hate certain religions and it’s fine, but if others do that it’s racism

So answer the question or admit you are an internet tough guy

Why are you, someone who could easily and quickly use your connections to our child rapists, refusing to do so?

a reply to: ScepticScot

Mrs informed me im only 5"9.

Canny kid her on about inches. LoL