An altercation at Canada's Wonderland spun backwards by the msm

Mods, move if necessary. I have put this op into disinfo because of the way the msm in Canada have spun this story.

There was an altercation at Canada's Wonderland. A Somali woman pushed past a Caucasian woman and hurt her child at the gate. Once through the gate a number of somalian woman verbally and then physically attacked the Caucasian woman and her husband. The msm have spun this as a hate crime by the Caucasian woman, when in fact it appears from the evidence the somalian woman could have just apologized and the situation would have dissolved, rather than devolved.

Attached is a video with explanations, the msm portion of the video used, the msm commentary and the Caucasian mother's info and and witness info,

The police were called and after reviewing the security video and getting testimony on what happened, no charges were laid so far. However, the Somali woman creating the problems alleges her burka/hijab, whatever the hell they wear, was ripped off. Anyway, another day in Trudeau's fascist and divisive Canada. Just another invader/illegal/terrorist hard done by hoax.

This is why we say, "Is it true or did you see it on the CBC, CTV, Global, The Star, The Sun, etc."

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Attached is a video with explanations, the msm portion of the video used, the msm commentary and the Caucasian mother's info and and witness info

Thank you for giving such a great explanation and example of how this should have been considered, all the pertinent information considered together for the true totality of circumstances. These are all factors that we the reader/viewer/public need to also demand before coming to conclusions -- well, if we have any intention or hope of being intellectually honest with ourselves.

As the guy in the video notes, there are at least three sides to every story: "Your" side, "my" side, and the truth. When anyone, but especially media, leaves out any pertinent information, and especially when no effort is shown to get both sides of a story, we the public need to question why that is. It's one thing for an article/story to say, "Requests for comments were not responded to at time of publication," or "So-and-So declined to give their side/a response to this story," or something similar. But when one side is presented as the whole truth with no consideration for any other side to the story, that's a huge red flag.

And, likewise, we the readers/viewers/public have our own responsibility to recognize when we are lacking sufficient information to come to any valid conclusion. We cannot be fooled unless we let ourselves be fooled. Further, we cannot be convinced of anything unless we let ourselves be convinced.

Great post!

Note, facebook seems to have removed her post detailing her side of events.

How apropos...

a reply to: Boadicea

Yep, there are always the two sides and the truth. I just find it obscene how the msm spins everything. It was obviously bad before, but with Trudeau bring the msm with a $600 million bailout, it has gotten much worse. The liberals now own their propaganda machine, xwhere before it was exchanging graft and favors.

a reply to: gallop

It doesn't surprise me since Trudeau and the liberals have made a deal with Facebook to filter out the truth. They think if they can control the narrative in social networks people won't notice the problems or the liberal's /Trudeau's rampant and unfettered criminality. They're wrong. Trudeau and it's circe duh fools and traitors will be gone come October.

Cheers - Dave

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: Boadicea

Yep, there are always the two sides and the truth. I just find it obscene how the msm spins everything. It was obviously bad before, but with Trudeau bring the msm with a $600 million bailout, it has gotten much worse. The liberals now own their propaganda machine, xwhere before it was exchanging graft and favors.

a reply to: gallop

It doesn't surprise me since Trudeau and the liberals have made a deal with Facebook to filter out the truth. They think if they can control the narrative in social networks people won't notice the problems or the liberal's /Trudeau's rampant and unfettered criminality. They're wrong. Trudeau and it's circe duh fools and traitors will be gone come October.

Cheers - Dave

Please be right and lets kick that lying child out of power... He so dumb its not even funny. A disgrace.

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

I saw a video of one woman hitting another...seems pretty obvious who's guilty here.

How is this blown out of proportion?

Can't find anything else on it really except a whole lot of people giving their opinion. Has Const. Andy Pattenden given a statement or conclusion?

Peace

originally posted by: operation mindcrime
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

I saw a video of one woman hitting another...seems pretty obvious who's guilty here.

How is this blown out of proportion?

Can't find anything else on it really except a whole lot of people giving their opinion. Has Const. Andy Pattenden given a statement or conclusion?

Peace

If it was the msm video that was used, you saw a snippet of what happened. Obviously, both parties have some fault in this but from witnesses and both stories from each side, it appears the majority of fault lies with the Somalis. We do have to wait I suppose for more information, but it won't be coming from the police or msm which are both forced to cowtow to the lame-ass lieberal lies and policy.

Cheers - Dave

This reminds me of a case a couple of years ago where a muslim woman got a teenage boy in trouble in the news claiming he made jokes about bombs around her and racially abused her on public transit.
The real story was published a week later showing his side.... she'd stepped on the back of his shoe when boarding and he asked her to apologize. She refused and apparently started calling him a monkey (the kid turned out to be half black), etc. So she was actually the abuser. That scene had also wound up in an altercation but the wrong person was vilified. I swear they have a hotline direct to the CBC for this nonsense posted at mosques... I just assume thanks to these stories that all such incidents are the opposite of what we're told. Been a safe bet so far.

a reply to: operation mindcrime
How do you know the Somali(s) hadn't attacked first? How do you know it wasn't self defense? Why do you completely disregard the other side of the story?

How on earth you can come to that conclusion based on the small snippet is astounding and a clear example of what's wrong with the leftist media and those that blindly believe what's reported by them.

Its a contentious issue.......
I know that the bad people who are trying to behead Westerners do not represent the masses who come to Canada to live a peacefull life...HOWEVER THESE PEOPLE WHO CLAIM TO WANT PEACEFUL LIFE DO SUPPORT THE MURDERERS WHO WISH TO DESTROY WESTERN CULTURE........you cant have it both ways......you cannot sit on the fence....if the masses who claim to want a peaceful life are not geehadding on the bad people who they supported and fostered then they are as guilty as the murderers.....you cant have it both ways.....and right now it is this way and it is wrong clearly....It is a National Security issue when Canadians citizens or visitors to Canada wear disguises that prevent the public from knowing their true identities......this is not a religious or social issue...this is a National Security issue and new laws need to be made prohibiting the wearing of public disguises .You can be anything you wish to be...but you cannot do it behind a disguise.Its time to enact Federal Identity laws that force all constituents to show their identitys when in public....either literally or via openly displayed identity cards placed upon your person in full view.....yes you can wear a Burka or a Mask or a Hoodie...but ….IF YOU CHOOSE TO DO THIS.....you WILL PUT YOUR FACE ON YOUR CHEST IN A PICTURE AND WE WILL KNOW WHO YOU ARE...or you will be fined or imprisoned.Its the Government to blame….they have abrogated their duties.I don't care who was right or wrong in the video...things happen ever day...we have laws....but I DO NOT SUPPORT NOR TOLERATE ANYONE WEARING A DISGUISE AND THEN EXPECTING TO BE TREATED WITH EQUALITY.

a reply to: Navieko

Oh joy...a reaction!!

Can I just state up front that I am not left nor right leaning in my political views. (Just to get that out of the way...lol)

I have been wanting to use the "ATS word of the month" so bad that I have been going though treads to try and find one that will allow me to use it.

Are you ready? Here it comes....

You sir are victim blaming....

If the other woman was beaten show me her injuries. All I have is this video that I am going to hump senseless to prove that the only one throwing puches is that white woman.

This would have been such a goid thread but alas...my wife thinks I spend too much time on ATS and if I want to save my marriage I will just leave it at...amusementparks, brings out the worst in people.

Peace

originally posted by: operation mindcrime
a reply to: Navieko

Oh joy...a reaction!!

Can I just state up front that I am not left nor right leaning in my political views. (Just to get that out of the way...lol)

I have been wanting to use the "ATS word of the month" so bad that I have been going though treads to try and find one that will allow me to use it.

Are you ready? Here it comes....

You sir are victim blaming....

If the other woman was beaten show me her injuries. All I have is this video that I am going to hump senseless to prove that the only one throwing puches is that white woman.

This would have been such a goid thread but alas...my wife thinks I spend too much time on ATS and if I want to save my marriage I will just leave it at...amusementparks, brings out the worst in people.

Peace

None of the lamestream liberal media, not Canada's Wonderland nor the police have released a full and complete video of the entire altercation. Full and complete meaning just prior to the woman's kid being pushed out of the way until all parties were escorted from the park. They have already admitted there is security video.

The only reason I can see for this little piece of negligence (non-release of video) is to maintain the liberal media's/police/park bias. I suppose releasing the entire video would destroy their insane narrative and just provide another blatant example of spin in "reporting." Releasing the entire video does not effect any investigation and may actually generate more witnesses, pro or con.

Appaet from any physical victims here, you know who the victims really are? The rest of us and the truth. You know who's killing the truth? Lieberals/progressives/sjws and of course the government, police and liberal party. Until these assholes come right, they have no credibility and a majority of normal thinking people don't believe their BS anymore.

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

I would probably agree with you if I were to really look into the matter but I enjoy taking the extreme standpoint for argument sake.

I see to many kneejerk, bandwagon posts on ATS and I am trying to bring back the level of civil discussion.

Sorry for not following through on this thread but real life is calling.

Peace

Nvm