It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: Peeple
nope, you said to fight Nazi's that is not true, no Nazi's in 1917 were there?
maybe you should recheck your source, what Nazi's were there in 1917?
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: thedigirati
They started fighting Nazis they were right back then they still are. All racists, homophobes, hate people, islamists, fundamentalists, ... are the same and need to die out before we can build a society worth living in.
Violence is the only language they understand.
I’ll do Covington separately
On heather heyer:
No I don’t think that the fact she was there prices she was in a bad group
That’s the claim you are making in Portland. You said everyone is larping and on one side or the other
That’s absurd. You have no proof of that claim. We have footage of three people being beaten by Antifa, Ngo the old man, and a bearded guy helping the old man
Ngo is a non combatant, you assert the old man is based in a photo of him with a weapon, and I’ve yet to see proof the bearded guy was
The point is if that’s true it’s true every time Antifa and right wing violent groups clash. You say no, it only applies to right wing people that were beat
As far as you doxxing
So the difference is Ngo doxxed someone with a mask, and that’s bad. But you did people without masks
Yep makes sense! We should respect the masked thugs privacy! Outing them is horrible and a danger to the masked thugs!
But you outing the unmasked thugs is noble and good. What a hypocrite!
As far as Ngo being a bad reporter
That’s your opinion. Ngo reporter in violent thugs and released the names of some of them. He was right, they were violent and beat him
We know you desperately want to change the story from Antifa beats journalist to Antifa is bad but so is Ngo and the proud boys
It’s pathetic victim shaming that should be beneath you
originally posted by: theantediluvian
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: theantediluvian
So you're saying it's ok to beat someone in the head with a crowbar, which could kill them? I guess it's ok to shoot someone in the face with a weatherby according to your logic? Should we all remember that the next time we see antifa fascisti creating BS and trouble?
Cheers - Dave
No, of course not. I've never said anything even remotely like that. If the guy who hit him with the cane (pretty sure that's what it was) was in turn hit with a baton, would you be up in arms about what a victim the guy who hit this guy was?
Of course not, because he was out there with a weapon and beating on people himself.
And if you made that point about how the guy who hit the guy was himself hit and how he's no victim because he was hitting people with things himself, do you think I would jump in to say, "So you're saying it's ok to beat someone in the head with a crowbar?"
I wouldn't, because that would be asinine.
originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
you are correct
the BEST way to fight Violence is to be Very good at Violence.
the better you are at violence the less you have to be violent.
I know this sound counter-intutive, but it's true.
Sun Tzu and Miyamoto Musashi knew what they were talking about.
go rin no sho, and art of war, best works Evah!!