It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Could you kindly source the section with the charges?
We will wait.
and we get a response from judicary
Many Democrats are eager to question Mueller publicly about the various episodes he examined as potentially obstructive efforts by Trump, however it remains unlikely Mueller will say much more than what is laid out in his report.
so there is that now we play the waiting game
In a statement issued Tuesday, the Judiciary panel’s top Republican Doug Collins (R-Ga.) said: “I hope the special counsel's testimony marks an end to the political gamesmanship that Judiciary Democrats have pursued at great cost to taxpayers. May this testimony bring to House Democrats the closure that the rest of America has enjoyed for months, and may it enable them to return to the business of legislating.” Collins accused “many” of “willfully” misrepresenting the special counsel’s findings and said Democrats have “neglected their responsibility to safeguard future elections from foreign influence.”
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Could you kindly source the section with the charges?
We will wait.
what a world we live in when a man is investigated for years with unlimited resources, NO CHARGES are brought, and still people cant bring themselves to admit there was no collusion. unreal
there are more at the source but these could get interesting answers
Republicans must not miss the opportunity to actually ask tough questions. Here is a very incomplete list of questions the Republicans—really all Americans—should ask Mueller.
1. Your report seems to indicate that you could not corroborate the Christopher Steele dossier. What steps did you take to review Steele’s source material?
Did you identify any of his original sources and speak to them?
Did you interview Steele directly? Was that interview transcribed?
Did any of Steele’s sources come from inside the United States—e.g., the State Department or individuals with ties to the Democratic National Committee or the Clinton campaign?
Did you determine whether Steele paid any of these sources? If so, how much and who did he pay? [...]
more interesting questions from a republican stand point
10) In Volume II, page 103, in reference to the participants in the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, you refer to “the firm that produced the Steele reporting.” Why did you intentionally omit citing the name Fusion GPS or its owner, Glenn Simpson, throughout the 448-page report?
11) Did you know that at the same time Fusion GPS was working to collect opposition research on Donald Trump for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee it also was representing Prevezon, a Russian-based company sanctioned by the U.S. government?
12) Why did you omit the fact that Glenn Simpson was working with Natalia Veselnitskya, the so-called Russian lawyer, on the Prevezon project and that Simpson met with her before the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting that she attended with Trump campaign associates including Donald Trump, Jr.?
13) Why did you also omit the fact the Glenn Simpson was working with Rinat Akhmetshin—another attendee of the Trump Tower meeting—on the Prevezon project and that Simpson met with both Veselnitskya and Akhmetshin the day after the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting? [....]
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
I imagine he wont lie
No charges then
No charges now
He knows what perjury is
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
I imagine he wont lie
No charges then
No charges now
He knows what perjury is
Mueller stepped down from DOJ employment on the 29th of last month.
He is no longer bound by DOJ policies and is a private citizen.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Could you kindly source the section with the charges?
We will wait.
what a world we live in when a man is investigated for years with unlimited resources, NO CHARGES are brought, and still people cant bring themselves to admit there was no collusion. unreal
There were charges brought, and convictions and guilty pleas.
Where have you been?
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
I imagine he wont lie
No charges then
No charges now
He knows what perjury is
Mueller stepped down from DOJ employment on the 29th of last month.
He is no longer bound by DOJ policies and is a private citizen.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Lots of fabricated words 😎
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
I imagine he wont lie
No charges then
No charges now
He knows what perjury is
Mueller stepped down from DOJ employment on the 29th of last month.
He is no longer bound by DOJ policies and is a private citizen.
Also means he can ignore the subpoena 😎
And he could plead the 5th 😎
Fox News has learned Mueller would appear only under a subpoena, which has been described as a "friendly" subpoena, one that in essence had been planned. Mueller is expected to stick to the "four corners" of his report.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
I imagine he wont lie
No charges then
No charges now
He knows what perjury is
Mueller stepped down from DOJ employment on the 29th of last month.
He is no longer bound by DOJ policies and is a private citizen.