It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
yes I am saying he is incorrect, and political....George is a liar. and I'm willing to tell him to his face.
Should they really have to wait till Congress gets their act together and come up with something that will be acceptable to the dems, will get past the grim reaper in the Senate, and happen to make it to the mad king"s desk on one of his few good days where he's not intent on burning it all to the ground?
originally posted by: hiddeninsite
a reply to: scraedtosleep
Just to clarify - so if someone breaks into YOUR house, we can expect you to hand out cookies and milk and give them your bed and not pay a cent towards electricity, upkeep, taxes and their share of what mileage they put on your house?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Lucidparadox
So you don’t want fewer refugees which would mean fewer “ children suffering “ ?
It sounds like you are OK with any amount of children suffering as long as the political objective is achieved .
Which would mean the kids are just pawns in the game and easily sacrificed .
BTW It’s not illegal to apply for asylum at points of entry.
But it is illegal to cross the border at unauthorized points .
Again.. you're missing what I'm saying.
I'm talking open borders. I'm saying open the gates, let people in.
That way we don't need the camps at all.
Soap and Toothpaste doesn't grow on trees does it ❓
My biggest gripe is that if they were not willing to put in the effort to try and make their country a better place for themselves, why would I want them in mine?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Lucidparadox
So you don’t want fewer refugees which would mean fewer “ children suffering “ ?
It sounds like you are OK with any amount of children suffering as long as the political objective is achieved .
Which would mean the kids are just pawns in the game and easily sacrificed .
BTW It’s not illegal to apply for asylum at points of entry.
But it is illegal to cross the border at unauthorized points .
Again.. you're missing what I'm saying.
I'm talking open borders. I'm saying open the gates, let people in.
That way we don't need the camps at all.
That's the exact type of platform that will get me to vote for Trump.
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Lucidparadox
So you don’t want fewer refugees which would mean fewer “ children suffering “ ?
It sounds like you are OK with any amount of children suffering as long as the political objective is achieved .
Which would mean the kids are just pawns in the game and easily sacrificed .
BTW It’s not illegal to apply for asylum at points of entry.
But it is illegal to cross the border at unauthorized points .
Again.. you're missing what I'm saying.
I'm talking open borders. I'm saying open the gates, let people in.
That way we don't need the camps at all.
Soap and Toothpaste doesn't grow on trees does it ❓
I'm pretty sure they had soap and toothpaste in the he's they were living in on this side of the border before they were whisked away and thrown into the camps. It only costs tax payer money when.the government takes them captive. Let them gomso they can work and buy their own toothpaste and soap
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: Fallingdown
The Liberals are using the welfare of children to their advantage again .
The way to end this mess is with a wall or permanent barrier .
Instead the Liberals would rather see children suffer .
We (the liberals....all of us) would like to state that we collectively agree that we believe that the mistreatment of children should be above partisan politics and that even the right should agree that children suffering is wrong regardless of politics.
We understand that this may be politically inconvenient for you lot but we would ask that you rise above the politics of this and call out the mistreatment of children regardless.
Yours kindly...
The collective hive mind that is "the liberals"
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Lucidparadox
So you don’t want fewer refugees which would mean fewer “ children suffering “ ?
It sounds like you are OK with any amount of children suffering as long as the political objective is achieved .
Which would mean the kids are just pawns in the game and easily sacrificed .
BTW It’s not illegal to apply for asylum at points of entry.
But it is illegal to cross the border at unauthorized points .
Again.. you're missing what I'm saying.
I'm talking open borders. I'm saying open the gates, let people in.
That way we don't need the camps at all.
That's the exact type of platform that will get me to vote for Trump.
Well sir, you aren't my targeted demographic.
The future is going to have alot.more people like me. The number of lefties is growing.
As the world ages.. borders and countries will matter less and less. We will recognize ourselves as earth, humanity as a whole.