It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Demasking protesters - like ANTIFA - these people need exposed!

page: 3
18
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 04:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: hombero
a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Oh booooohoooo, you're sick and tired of it so now we gotta do this plan you dreamed up. Every thread.


As far as this forum is concerned you are about as useful as a piss soaked roll of toilet paper after catching Montezuma's revenge in Mexico - and about as desirable as a handmade loaf of bread made by a one handed (left handed at that) Indian from the Untouchable caste after he had 3 meals of spicy curry.

Seriously you are the definition of troll stalker. I have yet to see you contribute one bit of positivist or constructive ideas to this forum since you started your obsession. You show up in other people threads and mock or say ridiculous things. Why do you stay if it is so bad and why do you read my posts if you get so triggered?

So what is it, are you just not capable of coming up with threads of your own? You lack the capacity to figure out what would be of interest to speak about? Or are you to scared to create your own thread b/c you just have no ideas of your own. Angry people are often like this.

Maybe you could stay away from my threads?




posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 04:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: DigginFoTroof




Demasking protesters - like ANTIFA - these people need exposed!


And these guys as well....




Same thing... Democrats under a hood.




The Klan originally were mostly drawn from members of both the Democratic party and Southern representatives of the National Union party (a faction later renamed as the Republican Party in 1869, under President Ulysses S. Grant), actually. A previously named "Republican Party" had opposed slavery but had different roots from the modern Republican Party as established during Grant's Presidency.

However, this picture was from Washington State in 1923. It included both Republicans and Democrats as is noted in this article:

Citizen Klan Electoral Politics and the KKK in WA - The Seattle Civil Rights and & Labour History Project of the University of Washington

edit on 21/6/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 04:34 PM
link   
I am torn on this one... on the one hand those clowns being unmasked is appealing... on the other hand I cant help but have the same vibe around the patriot act. focused on the immediate and not paying attention how something like this could come back and bite the regular joe on the butt.



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 04:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

So you don’t like them doxing your side but you want to dox their side?


Interesting...



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 04:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mandroid7
We should probably all just get gps implants for safety.

Maybe some more gov employees in masks could get that passed.

Never know, I can only hope!!



If it helps to battle the left and deep state, I’m sure it’ll be fine



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 06:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: AScrubWhoDied

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: DigginFoTroof




Demasking protesters - like ANTIFA - these people need exposed!


And these guys as well....




Same thing... Democrats under a hood.



Republican?



You don't get to rewrite history to serve your ideology.

The KKK came into power when the Democratic party started pouring money into their organization.

What the KKK did is go around and make sure that if you were a Republican that you would swear fealty to the Democratic party or get lynched.

Now, they did pick on a lot of black people since they were 100% Republican at the time (you know, because the Republicans freed them from slavery and all that) but it wasn't only blacks.

Over 1200 whites were lynched too for not swearing fealty to the Democratic party.

Learn real history and try again.



All 100% true, but lets forget (or maybe read about) reconstruction after the civil war and how many democrats left the party to begin forming what we see as rebuplican today.

When people say "look the republicans freed the slaves!" in an attempt to say the republican ideology of today freed the slaves, they are lying.


SoOo..

Is there some sort of point you are trying to make?

Because you honestly lost me on that one...

I did not say that Republicans traveled back in time to free the slaves.

I do realize that Democrats have to repaint Reconstruction as well and point out that although they were racist bastards BEFORE, they are not NOW.

Totally ignoring I guess the Democrat's current practice of identity politics, racism and yes, still the KKK.

All Democrats did is remake their plantations... Version 2.0 now with keeping black women barefoot, pregnant and living in squalor in return for a vote to keep them there.

Now in my mind as a reformed Democrat, Republicans are also lying cheating bastards, for the most part.

Still not as bad as the current Democratic party, with amazingly resembles the old Democratic party with a side order of Socialism.

But hey... whatever lets you sleep at night, right?

/facepalm



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 06:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Lumenari

So you don’t like them doxing your side but you want to dox their side?


Interesting...


If you wish to interpret what I posted that way then go for it.

So Antifa is cool with you?

Because that's what I got out of your post.




posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: DigginFoTroof

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: DigginFoTroof

I’m going to disagree. Unmasking is the same as doxxing and we’re all against that, aren’t we?



No it's not the same. But I see similarities.

I do sympathize for people who want to protest unpopular things and I can understand wanting to wear a face covering but when things start to get violent, especially if started by the people wearing the masks because non-protesters are only expressing their opinions and trying to debate, then they loose their right to anonymity. If they could remain calm and have a debate/discussion, I could get behind remaining masked to protect the protesters but when they start to become violent, they can't hide behind a mask.


Violence is already illegal.

Wearing a mask should not be illegal.



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 06:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Duderino
If people feel strongly about something, why hide their faces?


Dude, does this mean you are finally going to show us your real face?



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 06:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: DigginFoTroof




Demasking protesters - like ANTIFA - these people need exposed!


And these guys as well....




Same thing... Democrats under a hood.




The Klan originally were mostly drawn from members of both the Democratic party and Southern representatives of the National Union party (a faction later renamed as the Republican Party in 1869, under President Ulysses S. Grant), actually. A previously named "Republican Party" had opposed slavery but had different roots from the modern Republican Party as established during Grant's Presidency.

However, this picture was from Washington State in 1923. It included both Republicans and Democrats as is noted in this article:

Citizen Klan Electoral Politics and the KKK in WA - The Seattle Civil Rights and & Labour History Project of the University of Washington


So to you Republicans were paying the KKK to have people swear fealty to the Democratic party.

Just.... LOL

Please link for me the last Republican in politics that was a proud member of the KKK.

I'll give you Senator Byrd on my side of the debate... although he was beloved by certain racists in the Democratic party that are still involved and very much alive, such as the Clintons.




posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 06:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualarchitect

originally posted by: Duderino
If people feel strongly about something, why hide their faces?


Dude, does this mean you are finally going to show us your real face?


Please, I just ate, don't do that to me.😁🤣😂


Masks are a form of free speech, and even speech we hate must not be stifled by the state (feds, for the slow folks).

when a Mayor backs an unlawful group, the local sherrif can still be called, he is the ultimate law, locally.



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 06:50 PM
link   
a reply to: TonyS

2020 on its way
edit on 21-6-2019 by Steveogold because: spelling mistake

edit on 21-6-2019 by Steveogold because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 06:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

you can always use the crutches to hit someone



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 07:00 PM
link   
Think how WE think, or we’ll attack you

The very definition of fascism

The very mantra of the left



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

These are you words...




They cannot debate their ideology so to push their agenda they need force, be it "doxxing" to get rid of people that don't think like they do to a bike lock to the head for being an old white man.

Fascists who claim to be against something they actually are.

I think they all need unmasked and doxxed, but you won't find that happening anytime soon when you have Mayors who have no problem with what they do... because they support it.


Hypocrisy at its finest.

And nice strawman, just because I’ve called you out for being a hypocrite, doesn’t make me a antifa supporter...



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 09:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: DigginFoTroof

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: DigginFoTroof

I’m going to disagree. Unmasking is the same as doxxing and we’re all against that, aren’t we?



No it's not the same. But I see similarities.

I do sympathize for people who want to protest unpopular things and I can understand wanting to wear a face covering but when things start to get violent, especially if started by the people wearing the masks because non-protesters are only expressing their opinions and trying to debate, then they loose their right to anonymity. If they could remain calm and have a debate/discussion, I could get behind remaining masked to protect the protesters but when they start to become violent, they can't hide behind a mask.


Violence is already illegal.

Wearing a mask should not be illegal.



I agree but as these protests are political in nature, when they utilize a mask and violence, I think that raises the crime to terrorism (not "I'm going to baumb a building" type terrorism) because of the method. This was exactly the argument used against the KKK from the 1870's to the 1920's. It was SPECIFICALLY called terrorism because of the use of masks while perpetrating violence all for political ends. Can you agree with this? How many times did you hear these people (KKK) called domestic terrorists for having simple rallies with hoods or even a cross burning on private property when there was no violence involved (there were no "others" around them at the time). Claims were made that simply publicizing these events was a form of terrorism and IIRC, some were prosecuted in the 60's or 70's for small private rallies. I'll try to dig up these stories but I have a feeling these might be tough to find that talk about the exact legal aspect of them. I'd appreciate any help on finding that, I don't have unlimited time here.

So what do you say about this comparison and you haven't responded to my point that I agree with wanting to protect one's identity for some political protesting/causes for fear of reprisal. I have a hard time believing that should be illegal. It's when violence becomes a factor while doing this and this alone is a touchy subject and Charlottesville was a prime example of this.

Antifa was masked. Many of the more "extremists" on the right wore bandannas or face shields. But in many cases the masked Antifa attacked anyone on the right, masked or not, who were there peacefully and legally (antifa was not there legally). How many Antifa were DOX'd from this vs people on the right? I don't think those on the "right" who were masked should have had to remove their masks when they were attacked, but I think the attackers should have not been legally to wear them once they attacked. This is very hard to regulate, but I hope you can see the point I'm trying to make. At this point, when Antifa began to attck while masked, they became terrorists.



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 09:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
Think how WE think, or we’ll attack you

The very definition of fascism

The very mantra of the left


Is this a reply to the OP? If so, you TOTALLY missed the point and are one of the only people on this thread to do so so drastically. IDK if it is the "quote" or "reply" function not working again (gawd knows I've had more than enough problems with that!) or if it was a reply to the OP.... Care to explain?



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 09:07 PM
link   
a reply to: DigginFoTroof

I thought I addressed that because "violence" is already illegal.

Regardless if one is wearing a mask or not.



posted on Jun, 21 2019 @ 10:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: DigginFoTroof




Demasking protesters - like ANTIFA - these people need exposed!


And these guys as well....




Same thing... Democrats under a hood.




The Klan originally were mostly drawn from members of both the Democratic party and Southern representatives of the National Union party (a faction later renamed as the Republican Party in 1869, under President Ulysses S. Grant), actually. A previously named "Republican Party" had opposed slavery but had different roots from the modern Republican Party as established during Grant's Presidency.

However, this picture was from Washington State in 1923. It included both Republicans and Democrats as is noted in this article:

Citizen Klan Electoral Politics and the KKK in WA - The Seattle Civil Rights and & Labour History Project of the University of Washington


So to you Republicans were paying the KKK to have people swear fealty to the Democratic party.

Just.... LOL

Please link for me the last Republican in politics that was a proud member of the KKK.

I'll give you Senator Byrd on my side of the debate... although he was beloved by certain racists in the Democratic party that are still involved and very much alive, such as the Clintons.




Here are some:

David Duke From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edward L. Jackson From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clarence Morley From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Warren G. Harding From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But, to be clear, I am not denying Democratic party involvement in the KKK, I am being realist about the historical fact that there were also many Republicans involved, too.



posted on Jun, 22 2019 @ 02:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Duderino

The border patrol wears masks to keep from being identified by drug lords that will kill their families, Antifa wears masks because they're p***sies that are trying to convince people that they're as tough as the border patrol agents...but it's really just makeup on a pig, underneath they are scare little children in dire need of a spanking.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join