It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Federal Prosecutor John Durham is Zeroing In on President Obamas Top Intel People.

page: 5
61
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

As Devin Nunes calls it, the "Mueller Dossier".


Ooh La La πŸ’₯

Maybe when Mueller was in Russia "delivering" those Uranium "Samples" πŸ’₯

Ooh La La πŸ’₯




posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

Wait till you find out WHO the "Dossier" is really about (hint: not Trump)

πŸ’₯🀫πŸ’₯


I think it is fairly obvious:

The Trump Russia Dossier as Released By Buzzfeed



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:24 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Putting "TRUMP" in all caps is the dead giveaway πŸ”³πŸ”²πŸ”˜πŸ’ 



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

As Devin Nunes calls it, the "Mueller Dossier".


Ooh La La πŸ’₯

Maybe when Mueller was in Russia "delivering" those Uranium "Samples" πŸ’₯

Ooh La La πŸ’₯





Four months ago, AG nominee BARR said Uranium One was potentially far more serious than Trump-Russia collusion.

The implications of that statement went right over Democrat's/MSM heads.



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

As Devin Nunes calls it, the "Mueller Dossier".


Ooh La La πŸ’₯

Maybe when Mueller was in Russia "delivering" those Uranium "Samples" πŸ’₯

Ooh La La πŸ’₯


10 grams of uranium, that was forensic evidence for testing.

To give you an idea of how innocuously small this is, you'd require 50,000 grams to make an atomic bomb.

There are schools that have that size sample of Uranium in their science departments.

Here's the full text of the State Department cable from Wikileaks. Nothing nefarious about it, just a government errand for an FBI director delivering forensic evidence to Russian law enforcement, to verify the source of the smuggled Uranium.

edit on 17/6/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

Putting "TRUMP" in all caps is the dead giveaway πŸ”³πŸ”²πŸ”˜πŸ’ 


All the surnames are in capitals throughout the document. It makes it clearer to identify who did what.



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:52 PM
link   

a reply to: chr0naut
Here's the full text of the State Department cable from Wikileaks. Nothing nefarious about it, just a government errand for an FBI director delivering forensic evidence to Russian law enforcement.


so says the "official" report 😎

What "Wikileaks" cable?



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:53 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Too bad it's never been "officially" proven true eh πŸ˜ƒ



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

a reply to: chr0naut
Here's the full text of the State Department cable from Wikileaks. Nothing nefarious about it, just a government errand for an FBI director delivering forensic evidence to Russian law enforcement.


so says the "official" report 😎

What "Wikileaks" cable?


Oops, forgot to paste the link. I've gone back and fixed it now.



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

Too bad it's never been "officially" proven true eh πŸ˜ƒ


Parts have been proven true. Parts have been disproved.

The Mueller report, for one, while not mentioning the dossier by name, details several of the document's allegations, proving some and disproving others.



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 02:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

Too bad it's never been "officially" proven true eh πŸ˜ƒ


Parts have been proven true. Parts have been disproved.

The Mueller report, for one, while not mentioning the dossier by name, details several of the document's allegations, proving some and disproving others.


Which "parts" ? πŸ˜€



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 02:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: xuenchen

a reply to: chr0naut
Here's the full text of the State Department cable from Wikileaks. Nothing nefarious about it, just a government errand for an FBI director delivering forensic evidence to Russian law enforcement.


so says the "official" report 😎

What "Wikileaks" cable?


Oops, forgot to paste the link. I've gone back and fixed it now.


from you link:

""" This site can’t be reached """ πŸ’₯🎱πŸ’₯



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 02:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

As Devin Nunes calls it, the "Mueller Dossier".


Ooh La La πŸ’₯

Maybe when Mueller was in Russia "delivering" those Uranium "Samples" πŸ’₯

Ooh La La πŸ’₯


10 grams of uranium, that was forensic evidence for testing.

To give you an idea of how innocuously small this is, you'd require 50,000 grams to make an atomic bomb.

There are schools that have that size sample of Uranium in their science departments.

Here's the full text of the State Department cable from Wikileaks. Nothing nefarious about it, just a government errand for an FBI director delivering forensic evidence to Russian law enforcement, to verify the source of the smuggled Uranium.


Actually about 1/10th of that. Btw, did you know that the Russian softball nukes were only about 4kgs? You can actually make a very small weapon, it depends on how much energy you can put into it to start the reaction. I am not going to bother explaining the mechanics of making one, load geometry or the materials involved as there are too many crazies out there.

The point though of Hillary, Mueller, Kerry and Obama being involved in the uranium one deal is valid. Though, it really isn't much to worry about apparently as it's just treason and other high crimes by political players. But this is bizarro world where dems have made right into wtong, good into bad, greed into philanthropy and treason into patriatism, etc.

Cheers - Dave



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 03:34 PM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep


Judging by other investigations and how they work if durhams investigation had anything on anyone we would now it by now.


I really don't see that... at all. Especially because such information can and will be kept sealed from the public. In fact, judging by other investigations -- including Durham's own investigations -- any and all information (evidence) found will be used to protect some and throw the book at others.


That's not to say that they wont find something just that it 's safe to assume that they haven't found anything yet.


It's never safe to assume anything where these critters are involved.



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 04:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust




There have been a ton of revelations about "SPYGATE"


Its hard to make revelations about something that doesnt and never existed.

This is all tyrant trumps imagination or more likely lies and fabrications that dont contain a scintilla of truth.


πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

You’re beginning to realise you were brainwashed aren’t you

Is it frightening you how easy you were manipulated yet?



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 05:36 PM
link   
a reply to: TritonTaranis

Why would I think that again?



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Where did he say that? They all know that the alt right claims being made about U1 are not what happened.
Thats bull.
If he said that he is just playing the conspiracy theory game because no uranium ever went to Russia or ever will. Not from the sale of that company. Its been proven over and over again that is was only licensing that was sold.
NO URANIUM FROM THOSE TWO MINES IS ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE UNITED STATES.
So if he made any kind of reference to danger he's going to have to explain exactly what he thinks that danger is.



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 05:53 PM
link   
Anti Trump anti Trump anti Trump anti Trump anti Trump anti Trump anti Trump anti Trump



But β€˜the Russians’ influenced the election


Yeah right



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 05:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: TritonTaranis

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust




There have been a ton of revelations about "SPYGATE"


Its hard to make revelations about something that doesnt and never existed.

This is all tyrant trumps imagination or more likely lies and fabrications that dont contain a scintilla of truth.


πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

You’re beginning to realise you were brainwashed aren’t you

Is it frightening you how easy you were manipulated yet?


The media is so transparent to everyone with two IQ points that they can ONLY manipulate the easily manipulated.

And it’s not hard to tell who the β€˜easily manipulated’ are either



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 06:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

Where did he say that? They all know that the alt right claims being made about U1 are not what happened.
Thats bull.
If he said that he is just playing the conspiracy theory game because no uranium ever went to Russia or ever will. Not from the sale of that company. Its been proven over and over again that is was only licensing that was sold.
NO URANIUM FROM THOSE TWO MINES IS ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE UNITED STATES.
So if he made any kind of reference to danger he's going to have to explain exactly what he thinks that danger is.


The deal says that Canada cannot distribute uranium directly to the Russians.

I'm sure there is also a deal in place somewhere that says the Russians cannot give $ DIRECTLY to the Clinton foundation.....

But I'm sure they both found a way indirectly.....

Lolz

Come on silly, it almost seems as if Trump rejected your date proposal or something at this point



new topics

top topics



 
61
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join