It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judge Dismisses Suit Against Trump Over Forcible Kissing, Pay Discrimination

page: 1
16

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 08:47 PM
link   
...Annnd another one bites the dust.



A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit in which a former campaign staffer accused President Donald Trump of kissing her against her will and alleged that Trump’s presidential bid engaged in pay discrimination against female and African American employees.

Alva Johnson’s claim she was “forcibly kissed” by Trump at an August 2016 campaign stop in Tampa, Florida, garnered most of the attention when she filed suit last February, but the discrimination claims were the subject of most of the early legal maneuvering in the case.

U.S. District Court Judge William Jung, a Trump appointee, tossed out Johnson’s complaint Friday, saying it was too laden with political claims and attacks for the court to allow it to proceed.

www.politico.com...

Looks like yet another phoney, frivolous, political, hit-job lawsuit against your President, Donald J.Trump, has been shot down in court.
Glad to see true justice being served.




posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 08:55 PM
link   
The treasonist witch had an agenda while working for him.
President Trump probably caught that and gave her the kiss of death.



posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 08:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: charlyv
The treasonist witch had an agenda while working for him.
President Trump probably caught that and gave her the kiss of death.



She got her political mileage out of the initial accusation in the press...Hillary STILL lost.
The Judge obviously saw this case for the political hit job it was.



posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 09:03 PM
link   
I guess they can kiss that lawsuit goodbye 😎




posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 09:15 PM
link   
Just another lying RINO.

I’ll tell you what she can kiss .......
edit on 16-6-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 10:26 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT




saying it was too laden with political claims and attacks for the court to allow it to proceed.


Wow. The reason for his decision could get rid of all resistance argument.



posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 10:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: IAMTAT




saying it was too laden with political claims and attacks for the court to allow it to proceed.


Wow. The reason for his decision could get rid of all resistance argument.


Great point! But why does it take so long to throw out such a silly lawsuit?



posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 10:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: IAMTAT




saying it was too laden with political claims and attacks for the court to allow it to proceed.


Wow. The reason for his decision could get rid of all resistance argument.


Great point! But why does it take so long to throw out such a silly lawsuit?


That would be the process of government. Slow, inefficient, problematic, kind of like Bernie.
ETA and Biden.
edit on 16-6-2019 by highvein because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 10:50 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT




posted on Jun, 16 2019 @ 10:53 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Biden/Bernie 2020

Biden sniffs them out, Bernie steals their wallet.



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 01:10 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Judges are supposed to evaluate if the allegation actually occurred in fact.

To 'toss out a case' on the stated grounds would not really be good jurisprudence, however, the judge has given a fairly reasonable 30 days for the suit to be re-framed so that the case can be tried on basis of fact alone, rather than political polemic.

The case has not exactly been 'thrown out', it is being 're-framed'.

edit on 17/6/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 17 2019 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Yes, file an actual claim and not a political hit-piece or get lost. It's the exact proper response.



new topics

top topics



 
16

log in

join