It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Hulseyreport
You
See the burned red/grey chips, that's Iron Molten spheres. You only get Iron Molten spheres when the temp over 1500c.
False statement by you.
Debunking 9/11 Microsphere Myths
Thread starterMick West Start dateOct 27, 2018 Tags
www.metabunk.org...
Video
m.youtube.com...
In something of an experiment, I've made a detailed video focussing on one small claim of evidence. The claim is that the presence of iron microspheres in the World Trade Center dust means that high temperature incendiaries were used to demolish it.
The video explains that you can make iron microsphere by making sparks with steel hitting or abrading things, or by burning some tiny bits of iron in a low temperature flame. I also discuss how some of the spheres found might also have been pre-existing from construction, or might have been created after the collapse during cleanup.
Just in case you missed it, “ or by burning some tiny bits of iron in a low temperature flame.”
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: Hulseyreport
Watch the video and listen to NIST. All you hear for 95 percent of time on video between 2 minutes and just after 4 minutes is NIST.
Listen to them explain the free fall question! Don't take my word for it, just listen. This all you need to come away believing the truthers are right about the demolitions,
Is the video the final published report no.
Quote what the actual published report states.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Hulseyreport
What do you not understand if a piece of steel has sufficient surface area to mass, the steel will burn at temperatures below 1500C to make microspheres.
originally posted by: Hulseyreport
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Hulseyreport
What do you not understand if a piece of steel has sufficient surface area to mass, the steel will burn at temperatures below 1500C to make microspheres.
It is impossible to create Iron Microspheres with a low flame. Show me a video, that shows this?
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Hulseyreport
What free fall? There was no free fall in the twin towers.
WTC 7 as a whole fell slower the rate of acceleration of gravity.
WTC 7 started with an internal East to West progressive collapse. The facade did not even start to move downward until the penthouse completely disappeared below the roof line. WTC 7 twisted and kinked before the facade moved. The facade collapse was in three stages. The first stage where it accelerated slower than the rate of gravity. WTC core was pretty much gutted by the second stage of the facade collapse. The second stage is where negligible resistance was offered by the facade. With strong evidence the was faster than the acceleration due to gravity. With no indication or evidence the facade columns were being actively cut. The third and final stage of the facade collapse was started when the rate of free fall slowed less that that of gravity.
See the burned red/grey chips, that's Iron Molten spheres. You only get Iron Molten spheres when the temp over 1500c.
False Twin Towers came down at free speeds also, in their report.
www.skeptic.com...
3WHAT ABOUT THE ALMOST FREE-FALL COLLAPSE OF THE TWIN TOWERS? The key is the “almost” modifier. If I told you I was making almost $100,000 and you found out I was making only $67,000, you’d say I was exaggerating. So stop exaggerating the collapse speed of the WTC Towers! The 80,000 tons of structural steel slowed down the collapses of the Twin Towers to about ⅔ (two-thirds) of free-fall.3 And the core collapsed at about 40% of free-fall speed, coming down last.4 According to Richard Gage: “To bring a building symmetrically down, what we have to do is remove the core columns.” But on 9/11 the stronger core columns came down last, which violates this supposed most fundamental rule of controlled demolition.
There no such thing as negligible support during a freefall collapse.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Hulseyreport
You
See the burned red/grey chips, that's Iron Molten spheres. You only get Iron Molten spheres when the temp over 1500c.
Can you quote the Harriet paper where the chips burned at 1500c
What does the paper actually have for recorded temperatures?
False Twin Towers came down at free speeds also, in their report.
www.skeptic.com...
3WHAT ABOUT THE ALMOST FREE-FALL COLLAPSE OF THE TWIN TOWERS? The key is the “almost” modifier. If I told you I was making almost $100,000 and you found out I was making only $67,000, you’d say I was exaggerating. So stop exaggerating the collapse speed of the WTC Towers! The 80,000 tons of structural steel slowed down the collapses of the Twin Towers to about ⅔ (two-thirds) of free-fall.3 And the core collapsed at about 40% of free-fall speed, coming down last.4 According to Richard Gage: “To bring a building symmetrically down, what we have to do is remove the core columns.” But on 9/11 the stronger core columns came down last, which violates this supposed most fundamental rule of controlled demolition.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Hulseyreport
You
There no such thing as negligible support during a freefall collapse.
Another falsehood by you. Quote from the final support where NIST made any claims of negligible support. When the facade columns buckled, they offered negligible resistance. Huge difference.
There claiming negligible support in the revised report underneath
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Hulseyreport
Quote the recorded temperatures from the Harriet paper. There is no proof the reactions burnt hotter than the melting point of steel.