It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

AOC: Stupid Is as Stupid Does

page: 5
33
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 10:22 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck




Do you agree with her that all white people are racist due to the color of their skin?


There you go again, making up #, misrepresenting me and my posts.




posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 10:22 AM
link   
a reply to: NthOther


This woman is the result of parents never saying shut up just shut up



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 10:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha


If we consider gang members as terrorists, all the statistics change. White or Black supremacist groups are essentially in the noise and gangs are the biggest threat to life and limb, by far. How do we fix it?

Take out the money and provide the drugs at cost to the users. No profit = no drug gangs.



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 10:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Take out the money and provide the drugs at cost to the users. No profit = no drug gangs.


I must disagree with this. Take out the profit for the drug trade and they'll find a new way to make money. Human trafficking, etc.

They aren't going to say, "Well, drugs are legal, time to get my GED, trade school and become a plumber!"

We're talking about an embedded generational sickness in our inner cities.



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 11:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Who posted the ADL definition?

Hint: wasn't me.

TheRedneck



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 11:07 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




hey aren't going to say, "Well, drugs are legal, time to get my GED, trade school and become a plumber!"


Maybe they'll become politicians.



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 11:08 AM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

I can see reason in considering gang member terrorists, as they use similar tactics to foreign terrorists (just with a different aim). However, I cannot see sense in providing illicit drugs free of charge. That is a disaster waiting to happen.

The result will be that the drug pushers go into other lines of work (extortion, protection money, firearms, human trafficking, prostitution) and we have more people hooked on illicit drugs. Eventually, someone will decide we were doing it all wrong and stop the free drugs, and the pushers will simply go back into business making many times what they were.

The only way to stop gang violence is to take a hard-line approach to anyone wearing gang colors or engaged in criminality. Hard-line as in one strike and you're out of society for good. Show any threat to the police and you'll be shot on sight. It sounds harsh, but that is the reality of where we are now.

TheRedneck



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 11:09 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

Nowhere in the definitions and descriptions does it say all white people. It just so happens that a majority of white supremacists are white. What a coincident!


edit on 9-6-2019 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Democrat sources aren't credible 💥🤣💥



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 01:04 PM
link   
I would like to know exactly what criteria are used to determine whether a particular incident was a hate crime committed by a white supremacist or if the act was simply some idiot kids making bad decisions.
I saw a report on this a ways back and they kept showing scrbbled "Trump 2016" graffiti with a swastika next to it.
Looked to me like anti-Trumper work but hey what do I know?
If it is the Klan who is responsible then they must be some busy mo-fos given there are only about five thousand Klan members nation wide and given the amount of hoaxes and incidents like the Jesse Smollet case I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the media is once again full of sh!t.



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

Sounds like you're advocating for state sanctioned genocide of urban youth. And you have the gall to call other people racist?



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: TheRedneck

So you're just going to be obtuse and feign ignorance instead of admitting something that even this administration has found to be true?


who is a far right extremist? And by the same token, who and what is a far left extremist?

I'll need an iron clad definition of both, so I can understand your context.



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 05:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

No, I'm just explaining reality. Gangs are not people one can negotiate with or trust. You might want to consider that "gang member" is not a race, either. That's a stereotype and a false one at that.

I call racism when I see racism. Hating anyone due to the color of their skin is racism.

TheRedneck



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 09:02 PM
link   
The thought that internal white terrorist groups are more of a threat than external theocratic terrorists is a pinnacle of stupidity .



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 09:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: NthOther

Thanks for keeping her relevant. Its because of people like you we can look forward to a Cortez presidency one day.

And as much as you guys hate her, that makes me happy. I for one can't wait to vote for her. You're the right wing version of the people who called trump stupid for saying the moon was part of Mars.



You want to vote for this person? She doesn't even know what a garbage disposal is. She thinks it's a new invention. She thinks it "yelled at her." Jesus Christ.



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: NthOther

Thanks for keeping her relevant. Its because of people like you we can look forward to a Cortez presidency one day.

And as much as you guys hate her, that makes me happy. I for one can't wait to vote for her. You're the right wing version of the people who called trump stupid for saying the moon was part of Mars.



That would be the day "idiocracy" would be made real by the left... HEck, what am I saying/typing, you all have already made "idiocracy" real already...



posted on Jun, 9 2019 @ 11:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I see you like posting statistics. Let's see how deep this rabbit hole goes.

Without understanding how the data was gathered, and parsed, you have no idea if what youre linking is accurate.

So do you know how these numbers we're come by?

What demographics we're included, or excluded, and why?

What criteria we're used for excluding, and including specific cases, and why?

Sans this, you have nothing but faith in what some organization told you.



posted on Jun, 10 2019 @ 04:10 AM
link   
OP points out the idiocy of a politician and the brainwashed NPCs thank the OP for keeping that politician relevant.

AOC is unbelievably idiotic, and her supporters reveal themselves to be even more idiotic than her every time they defend her nonsense.

Socialism really is for idiots.



posted on Jun, 10 2019 @ 05:21 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

So when you say that it should be a death sentence for anyone wearing gang colors, is it going to be shoot on sight for anyone wearing blue, red, or purple, or just minority kids living in certain areas?

Does your proposal also include the execution of anyone that possesses a swastika tattoo?



posted on Jun, 10 2019 @ 06:47 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254


So when you say that it should be a death sentence for anyone wearing gang colors...

I said it should be an immediate shoot to kill situation for anyone threatening law enforcement. I would consider brandishing a deadly weapon, indicating an intent to use such a weapon, physical assault, or actions that clearly indicate the potential of a physical assault as a threat.

Do you believe that wearing specific colors is an active threat? I must now assume you do. So my next question is: do you know what an active threat is?

Or are you just making stuff up because you think it sounds good?

The bad part is that I was partially agreeing with you, in an attempt to have a serious discussion about the problem of domestic gang violence. It is becoming quite obvious to me that you did not wish to have a serious discussion. Which begs the question in turn, why are you in this thread? It would appear you are here because of identity politics, and feel some sort of mandate to defend something indefensible said/done by a politician you support for no other reason than the group she belongs to, and will use any methodology necessary to do so, even if that means responding to things you wish others had said.

This is what makes you irrelevant, and why there are so many complaining that ATS is projecting a "right-wing" attitude. The simple truth is that ATS isn't doing so, but the "left wing" posters are incapable of holding themselves to even the lowest of standards to debate their points.

TheRedneck




top topics



 
33
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join