a reply to: Lumenari
I am sorry Lumenari I have to tell you the simple truth is that Climate Change by human activity is a real phenomena including Global Warming,
regional climate change through deforestation and industrial activity as well as habitation and of course pollution.
Here is a fact though as of the 80's or 90's (the estimated ratio will be different today) about 60 percent of atmospheric CO2 was emitted by natural
sources but that still left about 40 percent form human activity.
Here is another one - we are supposedly in a period called and inter-glacial period, the ICE ages have not ended we are just in a warm period between
As the sun ages it get's hotter over billion's of years and through natural process it could be as soon as half a billion years to a time when the
earth is naturally too warm to ever have glaciation again, indeed it may be too warm for life as we know it by that point in time, it almost
definitely shall by 2 billion years into the future.
But it is a FACT that human activity is accelerating climate change in a globally adverse manner, fine if we look after people but the economic's
that trump represent's does not look after people only HIS people - can you blame the guy there, it does not make him a bad guy but it does mean that
he may be making some decision's that might come back to haunt in the future, that might have serious repercussion's BUT the real threat to climate is
actually Asia NOT america despite it's importance to the global consumer market place, Asia is still outputting some pretty nasty chemical's such as
Western China still using massive amount's of BANNED by international agreement CFC's in production of insulation foam's etc which are still
destroying the GLOBAL atmosphere, CHINA building stupid military bases on CORAL reef's destroying them in the process and killing off entire species
of fish and depopulating fish stock's in the region due to the importance of reef's in the fish life cycle.
SO CHINA is a far more serious problem than some guy in charge of the US.
Some Children DO have adverse reactions to vaccination's, the quality of the vaccination's is a matter - whom makes the money from them, most
vaccination's these day's are radiation treated pathogen's weakened and made as unable to reproduce as possible, the injection can still cause a mild
infection and the idea is that by exposing your immune system to them should you be infected by there natural cousin's you would already have anti
body's in your system that would prevent you from becoming infected by the natural pathogen.
As you know sometime's people's immune system can over react, this can cause damage to the body including the brain and this may or may not be down
to bad - poorly prepared (cost effective) vaccines or simply the natural reaction to the irradiated pathogen the body has which may be different to
the way other people react to it in some people.
The problem is that while it may immunize the majority and prevent an outbreak that may or may not have occurred as a result of the adverse reaction
to the vaccination the affected child can therefore develop health complication's including autism as a result of being exposed to the artificially
altered pathogen included in the vaccine - AND they may or may not have been exposed to the natural pathogen in the real world which turns vaccination
into a kind of Russian roulette now doesn't it.
On the one hand the disease has half or more a cylinder of bullets for the game of Russian roulette and on the other side the vaccine has less
bullet's but if you are the unlucky one you still catch the bullet but either way some are going to suffer unless the disease was actually never going
to strike anyway, there is no argument vaccination was a miracle of medicine that prevented pandemic's and saved literally millions' perhaps even
billions of lives but this remain's a fact of the equation, some people will be made sick by the vaccine and some will be damaged, far less than
would have been killed by an outbreak of the disease the vaccine is meant to address but still it remain's a gamble, odd's on it won't do you any harm
but there is a slight chance you may be one of those that are susceptible to the damage it can cause.
Vaccines are about protecting society more than protecting the individual, by immunizing the population you prevent the outbreak from occurring anf
for some the loss of a few lives is preferential to the loss of a lot of lives so it is the better of two choices under that pretext.
And then there was the whole scandal of the Gates Foundation and other's body's that were tainting vaccines in Africa with chemical's meant to
chemically sterilize the vaccine's recipient's and cut the African birth rate without the permission of the people receiving the vaccination's, they
have probably done this elsewhere as well and I should not be surprised if it turned out that the European's and American's had also suffered this
illegal activity as it would definitely explain our falling birth rates.
Clean Coal, in Trump's defense he is half right, in England we have very good coal - we don't use it any more but it is among the best coal in the
world, low sulfur content and clean burning - it still output's a hell of a lot of Carbon Dioxide that was trapped in the ancient wood though.
So in affect there is no CLEAN coal but there is CLEANER coal and DIRTIER coal, south American coal, Chinese coal and young coal in general tend to
be dirtier due to higher sulfur content and other contaminant's that are released when it is burned.
All coal is a natural carbon store, if you want to burn coal cleanly there are two way's to do it, plant tree's to compensate for the coal you are
burning or find a carbon capture technology that will filter the carbon dioxide from the coal and allow you to store or reuse it.
edit on 4-6-2019 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)