It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
I'm not sure the age thing matters to me as much as another fundamental element here. Don't get me wrong, the age element matters, but I believe there is a larger issue.
To me, the issue boils down to mental anguish versus physical pain and suffering. Now, I am not suggesting that mental anguish is not a real medical condition, but I have a hard time putting it in the category as a horrific injury, deadly disease or significant physical disability (whatever the cause, genetic, birth, etc.).
To me, the two are different in the respect that one is a clear and present affliction which is occurring in a real-time state, and the other is a mental image of something which happened in the past and is not occurring in a real-time state.0
Just my .02
Bottom line...I don't think this euthanasia should have been allowed. Sad day.
Mental anguish kills far more people than physical. Go look at how many vets in the US commit suicide. Just because you don’t see it, doesn’t mean it isn’t real.
I beg to differ, 'mental anguish' itself didn't kill them, something else did.
Ok, then the gun they shoot themselves with killed them. Maybe you would rather ban guns so they can't do that?